From: Bill – Louisville (11/20/09)
Thank you for your Point of View on the JBS-Swift company. My father, who is 90, and all my uncles worked at Armour, Fischer’s and other such companies until their retirement. Many people raised their families from the employment at these companies.
I remember as a kid going to work with my dad and yes -- it does stink. But now, some uppity people who think it's cool to live downtown or in Butchertown thinking they can just make a company up and move is ridiculous. If anything in that neighborhood is to be moved, it should be all the junked car lots and run down lots on Ohio Street. From Story Avenue to River Road there’s nothing but old scrap yards and used car parts. I don't hear anyone complaining about all the contaminated ground caused by antifreeze and oil that has seeped into the ground over there. Or any junk yard, for that matter.
From: Ray – New Middletown, Indiana (11/20/09)
Closing slaughter houses like JBS-Swift would be a good step towards a healthier society. And I also find it hard to feel sympathy for the Swift employees who kill for a living.
From: William – Shelbyville, Kentucky (11/17/09)
Barack Obama was elected president, but he has not shown that he is qualified for the job. I admit that he is an eloquent speaker, but that is not a validation of his election. It is only one of the reasons he was elected. I am quite sure that the major factor in his election is that the blacks in America wanted a black president regardless of his political views. That is an objective observation, not a racial prejudice.
The president’s positions in state politics in Illinois were socialist, and he appears to be intent on bringing health care and much of American business under government control. If that isn’t a socialist agenda, I doubt that the betrayal of the capitalist system has been given a name yet.
I personally believe that president obama (the lower case is intentional) will be judged by history to be the worst U.S. president to date. Worse presidents may be elected in the future, but I am concerned that this country may not be recognizable if this president’s agenda is enacted.
From: Dawn – Elizabethtown, Kentucky (11/13/09)
Why punish just the tobacco users? If you really want to cut the deficit, place a tax on something that everyone uses. Here’s one: paper products. A tax on such a product could be small enough that it will not affect people’s pocketbooks, and at the same time would create new revenue.
If the government officials really wanted to put a dent in the deficit, they would take a pay cut! Don’t get me wrong -- they should be compensated for their time, but not at this price. Why should they be paid such an amount for doing something for the greater good of their county, city and state
From: Robert – Fairdale, Kentucky (11/13/09)
I am a long time smoker. I did not create Kentucky's budget shortfalls, and I still do not understand why I have to pay for it while others do not. We already are not allowed to smoke indoors at any establishment, our cigarettes have been turned into fire safety cigarettes, and now we are expected to pay for Kentucky's budget shortfalls. Why not increase the sales tax across the board instead of only taxing smokers? It’s awfully funny that when you put that idea in front of non-smokers, they don't support that. Every citizen of Kentucky should have to pay for the budget, not just the smokers.
From: Raymond – Louisville (11/12/09)
I do not smoke. I do feel it’s unfair to make up budget shortfalls on many who are least able to pay. This is one of the few pleasures a lot of our citizens have, since they cannot afford to go to country club and get stoned or snort a little snow.
Sure it is a health hazard, but so are many other activities.
From: Eddie – Louisville (11/12/09)
I think something should be done about the trend of “saggin’” in our neighborhoods. This is a tacky look and shows no respect. I feel that all who are seen doing this should be fined for indecent exposure. This would also help offset the revenue shortfall.
This really has to end. You can't even go get a burger now without seeing someone's underwear.
From: Victor – Louisville (11/12/09)
As citizens of Louisville we constantly hear about budget shortfalls within the city. But it seems to me that if the city really wanted to make up shortfalls in the budget, they would take a harder look at all the people who feel they do not need to pay for the vehicle taxes they owe.
Everyday, and I mean everyday, I see at least 15 to 20 expired tags, most by more than six months. Sometimes when I'm in traffic I see a police car behind such an individual and ignoring such facts. If the police paid more attention to these facts it would lead to more tickets, which would lead to more city dollars.
We moved here ten years ago and are now considering moving out. Louisville has to get better control of its police and how they deal with such problems. I would be willing to bet we have more fatal accidents than most large cities. Most people in this city believe speed limits, stop signs, traffic lights and turn signals are just a suggestion. I also am willing to bet 90% of those who have expired tags are also without insurance.
From: Kenny – Louisville (11/10/09)
Well, congratulations on passing the casino bill, Ohio. At least you people are living in this century, unlike the idiots here in Kentucky. If the right-wing Bible pushers and the idiots in Frankfort don't wake up, in two years horseracing will be non-existent. And to think, this is the horseracing Capital of the World!
All I hear is people whine and complain about the crime, drugs and prostitution casinos would bring with them. They obviously haven't driven down Broadway in Louisville on a Saturday night. I wonder if the people against slots or casinos in this state even realize we have moved up in the world. We now have running water, inside toilets, and even electricity.
Someone needs to get a clue -- quick.
From: Rita – Bedford, Kentucky (11/6/09)
We live in Trimble County near the LG&E plant. I believe the waste that comes from LG&E is causing large number of cancers, lung problems and other health problems with our citizens.
Just about every family that lives here has a member that has been affected by the air that we breathe. Trees are dying in the orchards that dot our county. And Lord only knows what else.
Yes, we do have the landfill here. That could be causing problems too. But, LG&E is not helping. The county judge tells us the money we get from both of the companies provides funding for our county to operate. I think we have made a deal with the devil and now he has come to collect.
LG&E always hides the facts until it is too late. Our drinking water comes from the ground that flows under the LG&E plant. What do you think is going to happen to that drinking water? Some families still have underground wells they use everyday.
From: Lisa – Bardstown, Kentucky (11/5/09
The last time Ford opened the contract they told the employees that if they agreed to the new cuts no one at the Louisville plant would be laid off.
Guess what? They lied! But the public doesn't know that do they?
The employees of Ford are tired of being lied to.
From: Stuart - Louisville (11/4/09)
Why does Bill Lamb think that employees of a company are the ones that should be paid less? Why not the CEO? Why not the multiple levels of needless and useless management? Why not the shareholders? Why do people think it is the employees' meager pay that will solve a company's inability to manage their money so that one bad year won't put them into collapse?
This doesn't surprise me coming from a CEO type like Mr. Lamb who, I'm sure, never thinks of dropping his pay, or his minion of managers that really don't contribute much to the success of the company.
Oh, by the way - Ford made ONE BILLION DOLLARS last quarter. That's with a "B." Companies want to use the recession as an excuse to screw their workers. We have to remember Ford, or GM, or GE are companies. They are not humans; they don't care about humans or their employees. All they care about is money, greed, and more money. So excuse us humans for sticking up for ourselves.
It's unfortunate there isn't many leaders such as yourself that stick up for humans. Maybe Ford will come to your aid when you're in need. Hopefully, humans won't.
And to bring up Flint, Michigan is also a mistake. Companies SHOULD have financed/funded the retirement of their employees during the Golden Years. And they did. But then they stole, took, lent, and -- through acquisitions -- raided people's retirements. Don't complain now that we have to pay those people who built our company what they were PROMISED.
Where did you and other leaders learn your ethics? Gordon Gecko?
From: Connie - Lebanon Junction, Kentucky (11/4/09)
In response to your Ford Employee Point of View:
The points you seem to have overlooked during your biased opinion is the fact that the union workers have indeed given many concessions to Ford in order for this company to survive. In doing so, they have been able to remain in total operation without taxpayer dollars given by the Government in the form of a bailout.
These workers should be applauded for their efforts instead of condemned by the media. You have also insulted thousands of men and women -- not to mention their families -- by implying that they have little or no education. Do you have stats to back this statement up or are you following the rest of the media and stereotyping these workers? Many of these men and women do have college degrees, but chose this type of work in order to support their families.
Please feel free to walk one day in the life of one of these workers and fill in for one of them on the line. When you're done, let us know how you feel about the contract and the "low education" issue again.
From: Joel - Louisville (11/4/09)
I just received my 2009 Property Tax notice, and here is my opinion:
Two-thirds of my tax bill is the School Real Estate tax. First off, I have no children of school age. Not that I don't support education, but I am paying for your kids.
Then on top of it, I am sure my property value is higher than some of the families attending the school right down the street from me. Yet I see kids on my street getting home from school at 5:30. The entire system should go back to neighborhood schools where the people who live in that neighborhood pay for that school.
Even though I have no school age kids, I would feel better if I knew my money was at least supporting my neighborhood.
From: Betty - New Albany, Indiana (11/3/09)
I have to applaud Mr. Lamb for his Point of View tonight. My husband is a Ford retiree and we both felt the employees were voting themselves out of a job through several contracts when they made such big demands. We've seen it come to pass and they're still doing it.
We agree that less pay is better than no job at all. We also agree that Ford people should drive Ford cars. As the song goes, "Don't bite the hand that's feeding you."
From: Karla - Louisville (11/3/09)
Yes, I chose to work instead of going into substantial debt to obtain a college degree. I do have some college, but I have no student loan debt, mortgage or credit card debt.
Maybe we all should do manual labor to appreciate how this economy really works. After we have everything paid off, we can give our poor, mismanaged (college de-GREED) employers part of our paychecks for hiring us in the first place.
From: S.L. - Louisville (10/27/09)
I am glad someone in this community is watching Jim King. I think it says a lot about someone's character that he was accused by his wife of physically, emotionally and verbally abusing her. Has his ex-wife now said this was a lie?
Mr. Lamb, in your two Point of View pieces on Mr. King, these accusations have not been specifically addressed. I hope that the Courier-Journal continues to look into all of Mr. King's actions, especially those that give us insight into his past and present actions, especially Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway's investigation.
From: Glenn - Louisville (10/25/09)
After reports of domestic violence and abuse (in addition to improper funding) I was wondering if "Point of View" is still sailing on the "KING FOR MAYOR" boat. This is the problem with America; we do not hold community leaders responsible for their personal lives when it is who they are as a whole person that counts.
I wonder why the two U of L basketball players were not held accountable for fighting police, hmmmm?
From: Donna - Louisville (10/23/09)
I have a lot of problems with making all downtown streets two-way, especially when I need to go to hospitals. I am from the Louisville area but have no Idea how to get around downtown. Two-way streets at least would let me turn around and not get lost, plus It Is very dangerous and scary when I have to stop and ask for directions. It is unsafe.
From: Lisa - Louisville (10/22/09)
I just learned Kentucky is #1 in child abuse. I'm embarrassed and appalled. It makes me so angry to watch the politicians and businesses of our town put all of that money into campaigns and building bigger buildings when that money could be going to Child Protective Services to hire more social workers to help them concentrate and really investigate their cases instead of being so overwhelmed that they can't take the time to really work the cases like they should.
Why is it that with today's technology we can put a man on the moon, but can't or won't stop the disgusting child porn that just fuels these sick individuals that sexually and violently abuse these poor kids? It breaks my heart because every day there is a story about a child being beaten, violated and/or murdered in the paper and on the news.
What is wrong with our country? Can someone please tell me how this can be happening? Won't anyone stand up for these children and say enough is enough? Hopefully, I'm not the only one that feels this way.
From: Deborah (10/22/09)
I agree that people should not smoke around the hospital entrances. But how can a company dictate what you do on your own time or when you're at home? How dare they? I think they're fitting right in with Obama's socialism and the transition of our society to communism. Last I heard this is still a free country. I agree smoke does stink, and as a smoker I do everything I can to accommodate non-smokers wherever I'm at, be it at home, work or out in public. It feels as though this is becoming reverse discrimination against the smoker.
Since Norton's has taken this stand, they need to ban perfumes, colognes, scented room sprays and everything else with this type of odor. I suffer from allergies and asthma; I'm around people throughout my work day and I can't tell you how badly some of these smells affect me. So if one is stopped they should stop them all.
Then let's not even begin talking about all the horrible odors you smell when you go into a hospital -- what about them?
From: Carl - Louisville (10/21/09)
Looks like Norton finally fell into the "Socialism" ranks with all the others. I smoke and if my smoke offends anyone I gladly smoke elsewhere. But don't tell me I can't smoke in my car or outside. Are they going to make visitors take a shower or bath before they visit a sick relative? I would much rather smell cigarette smoke than some of the heavy perfumes, after shave, and hair sprays many people use.
From: Petra - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (10/21/09)
In response to the no smoking rule at Norton Hospital: I agree the staff should not smoke while on duty to prevent health issues with the patients. But is it fair to tell them they can't smell of smoke at work or get fired? What if Norton fired a very vital person in saving someone's life just because he or she smelled of smoke? Let's face it, if you smoke at home or in your car, the smoke smell does linger from day to day and is hard to get rid of, even if your partner smokes. So does Norton offer a quitters program for their associates? Emotional support?
True, nobody should smoke at all. It is a nasty habit, but there are a lot of talented and knowledgeable people in the medical field. To ban them from even smelling of smoke is going a little overboard. If somebody was doing something to save my life, I think it wouldn't matter if they smelled like smoke or something else. Some people's colognes offend me but that's just me.
From: Crystal - Louisville (10/20/09)
This smoke break policy is completely ridiculous. Yes they have control of what can go on on their property, but if the employee can get off the property and back to their post by the end of their break, then what they do on their break (as long as it isn't illegal) is none of Norton's business. I would like to know exactly what Norton's definition of "smoke break" is. The labor laws clearly state what amount of break time is required per hours of work. So is Norton taking away extra breaks that had been previously given, or are they taking away breaks that are required by law?
From: Rosa (10/20/09)
I have also been offended by the smell of the cigarette smoke in health care facilities when I have been there with both of my husbands. And also the cigarettes have contributed to their health problems and death of the first one, and now my present husband has lung cancer and heart failure. The manufacturers of cigarettes did not make them smoke but the addictions were the main reason for their failure to quit. My present husband has quit now but he smoked for 50 years before he realized just how much danger he was in. My sister also smoked for years and has lung cancer too. So you see why I am such an advocate about the smoking in these public places and people smelling so bad.
They talk about rights. Well, we have a right also about not wanting to smell or be around that foul odor.
Thank you for letting me sound off on this subject. My heart is broken over all the people who have fallen victim to this horrible addiction.
From: Dale - Sellersburg, Indiana (10/20/09)
I agree with Bill Lamb's comments related to Norton Hospital's new employee non-smoking policy. Having been a healthcare consultant for many years, this is a policy that is long overdue and has been initiated by many hospitals in all states. I wish that non-smoking enforcement would be farther reaching in the public places throughout our communities - namely, both inside and outside restaurants, entertainment venues and public meeting and shopping locations.
We recently moved to the area from a location in Florida where smoking was prohibited in all indoor and outdoor public places -- it was great not being exposed to second hand smoke and its associated smell in the air and on clothing. Keep up this type of advocacy.
From: Jerry - Louisville (10/14/09)
It's truly a sad state of affairs when the President of United States, through no fault of his own, wins a Nobel Prize and says he's donating the money to charity, and you feel the need to bash him. I don't know why I'm surprised. I guess I thought your obvious political views didn't always cloud your judgment. And isn't it convenient that your support of big business excuses you from doing the right thing when it comes to health care?
I'm curious. What percentage of Fox 41's annual income is health-care related? I guess you would rather not say. There is something inherently wrong with a country that makes billions of dollars off of the sick. It's quite Christian, don't you think?
Has anyone ever compared you to Rush Limbaugh? You're not that bad. Yet.
From: Brian - Louisville (10/14/09)
I know that you must bow to your FOX masters, but I finally see that you are an irredeemable right-wing mouthpiece. Please keep your ignorance off the airwaves and just let Barry and Candyce report the news or let someone with a different perspective pontificate bi-weekly to balance you.
I don't see any other station manager spouting off "Glenn Beckisms" constantly. Why do your viewers have to suffer your opinions? When all the foolishness about the President addressing school children made the rounds, you had nothing at all to say. Your criticisms of the Nobel Prize being given to a man who has entirely changed the dialogue between nations and reached out to people around the world that we disagree with, made me sick this morning. President Obama has reached out to people with a handshake instead of the baseball bat used by your hero, George W. Bush. We finally have a President we can be proud of and right-wing reactionary, angry white men like you seem unable to deal with it.
Bush was an absolute disgrace, probably a war criminal, and at last we have a man up to the job who does not embarrass us every time he opens his mouth. My only solace is that people like you (and me) will be quickly forgotten while President Obama will long be honored and remembered.
(Editor's Note: Aside from its network affiliation, WDRB-TV has no connection with any other arm of Fox Broadcasting, including Fox News Channel. The station is owned by Block Communications, Inc., based in Toledo, Ohio.)
From: James - Marengo, Indiana (10/8/09)
Recently, Mr. Lamb stated that he believed that the government was getting too big and controlling too much. I agree with him completely, but I think that there's one thing we must realize:
The government gives us the biggest decision of all every Election Day -- to pick who our leaders will be -- but how many people actually vote? Voters have every right to complain, but perhaps our government would be more apt to listen to us if we all did our duties.
From: Lee - Louisville (10/8/09)
Bill Lamb's SECOND attack on River Fields. Bill, do your homework, or get someone to do it for you. Your viewers deserve an informed opinion. You and your viewers should know that River Fields has been instrumental in preservation efforts throughout Metro Louisville in the Ohio River Corridor, including saving the Marine Hospital in PORTLAND, and Kosmosdale Greenway in the SOUTH end. Those are just two examples.
From: Sheila - Henryville, Indiana (10/5/09)
What do you think about the Louisville Metro Revenue Commission sending out bills for occupational license taxes for 2007 and charging penalties and interest? After contacting them, it seems as though the employers are liable for notifying their employees about the occupational taxes. Unfortunately, this isn't always done and the next thing you know....bingo...you have a bill in the mail.
This would be OK if you knew about it and made more than $12-14,000 per year.
From: Mike - New Castle, Kentucky (10/5/09)
It's not like they want to build a bridge where there wasn't one before. The state is responsible for maintaining the bridge, which they obviously haven't. Now people are losing income and wasting fuel on a long detour. The state should be held financially responsible for every day the bridge is closed.
Come on, where are all those slick lawyers when you need them?
From: Lee - Louisville (10/2/09)
Bill, before you blast someone you ought to get your facts straight. Metro Louisville closed the Harrods Creek Bridge. Metro Louisville could have made simple repairs to the guard rail a year ago, and kept the bridge open all this time. Metro Louisville could make simple repairs right now and open the bridge if it wanted to.
Again, get your facts straight: Metro closed the bridge; Metro kept it closed; and Metro is keeping it closed...not River Fields.
From: Lynn - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (9/30/09)
I work in the medical field with patients and insurance companies daily. It's a shame it's taken this long for someone to step in and put a stop to the bullying -- not only by Humana, but any insurance company.
Many of these patients have little knowledge of what kind of plan they are signing up for; they only know that it's cheaper. Well, there are reasons it's cheaper. But finding out what those reasons are will unfortunately cost them in the long run when their claims leave them owing money to the doctors, hospitals and such -- money they didn't put into their already squeezed tight budget. I wonder if that's part of the sales pitch.
I could have been a victim of the insurance game. When searching for my husband's insurance, a company attempted the scare tactic on me. I waited until the end of our conversation to inform him of my occupation. At that time, he cursed and hung up on me. I reported the company to the insurance commissioner the next day.
You stated that you didn't care if all of Humana's claims were true. You may change you mind when you or someone you know is in need of insurance. For your sake, I hope you don't get a true salesman.
From: Shannon - Palmyra, Indiana (9/30/09)
Why is it that seat belts are required by law, but there isn't a law making people on motorcycles wear helmets? It's sad - every day you hear about a motorcyclist dying because they didn't have a helmet on. I believe in seatbelts just as much as I believe in wearing a helmet. We need to at least pass a law requiring children on the back of a motorcycle to wear a helmet.
From: James - Crestwood, Kentucky (9/30/09)
I could not agree with you more on your comments about freedom of speech as related to the government involvement in the Humana newsletter. I have no great love for Humana, but such attempts by our current government to interfere with free communication in our country is extremely alarming. It appears that the only "free" speech that is permitted is from the administration, and it doesn't matter whether it is true or accurate.
From: George - Sellersburg, Indiana (9/29/09)
Bill Lamb was spot on about Humana and the Obama administration. Big Brother is now watching us. Freedom of speech is a thing of the past. If anyone disagrees with the government you are wrong.
Sad, sad, sad -- our forefathers fought and died for this right.
From: Bill - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (9/29/09)
Bill, you are wrong about free speech and Humana.
Humana is free to take a public position, even one that is wrong. Humana is not free to privately pressure its customers on a political question -- especially one that directly affects their relationship.
Apply your thinking to any business situation from employer-employee to financial services; those who hold our health and wealth in their hands may not threaten us to achieve their own political ends. Intimidating political innuendo toward a client is not free speech, and that was a fact long before our current administration took office.
From: Ty - Louisville (9/28/09)
I want to address the situation at Fourth Street Live. Why is it only for the white people? They have nothing for the blacks down there. Is it that they don't want the blacks down there? They've made it clear that they don't want our style there (not allowing t-shirts or jerseys and having no music events for blacks).
I say protest them and get them shut down.
From: Jacqueline - Brooks, Kentucky (9/28/09)
Would you please tell me why domestic violence is not a big issue? Why are there not judges who take this matter seriously? All these men seen to walk away with a slap on the hand and are just put on another two=year no contact order.
Our laws have to be changed. There is nothing done to these men until someone is killed, no matter how many EPOs or DVOs are taken out.
From: Paul - Louisville (9/26/09)
Recently, Mr. Lamb talked about other news channels and their lack of any real good news. Well, all of this may seem true, but what of the channels based here in Louisville? What about the fact that news is being ignored here in our own city? Why is it that he preaches about these channels when his own channel is ignoring a major news story -- one that would send ripples throughout the community?
I am referring to the case/story of a Louisville Metro Police Officer, Jackie Hollingsworth. Back in July, WHAS-11 (the only one to report this) ran a report about the allegations that she stole nearly $15,000 from the Louisville Black Police Officers Union. The story included bits about how both LMPS and the FBI did investigations. They generated over 500 pieces of paper with mountains of evidence that showed she stole this money. In a taped interview, she even admitted to stealing this money. A police officer, one who was entrusted to enforce the law, admitted to breaking it.
How is it that no other station in Louisville picked up on this? Why? Is it because she is black and the stations feared a reprisal of sorts? I would like to challenge WDRB and Mr. Lamb. Conduct your own investigation of this and air a story about this. Interview the key players and look at the evidence. Let the public become aware of the fact that one of "Louisville's Finest" just might be a common thief.
From: Michael - Brandenburg, Kentucky (9/25/09)
I found your comments about news nonsense fascinating. I think your criticism of the 24-hour news channels just being talking heads is hypocrisy.
I have been watching Fox in the Morning for years and I really like the news and weather people. However when Barry Bernson and Candyce Clifft cruise the Internet looking for bizarre and weird stuff just to take up air time, I think they also become talking heads and Fox in the Morning becomes news nonsense.
From: John - Louisville (9/22/09)
I see the mayor is going to spend about $30 million on a park in the southwest part of the county. That's great, if the streets and basements didn't flood every time it rains.
Why not put that money into the city infrastructure instead of my sewer bill going up every year?
From: Ken - Bardstown, Kentucky (9/21/09)
Why are we not hearing more about the last time the mysterious Swine Flu appeared and we had vaccine ready, instantly, to inoculate everyone? The politics were bungled and the program was stopped (1978) until now. But now, we are combining the normal type "A" -- also known as H1N1 -- with "Swine Flu" to get the numbers and the panic up. Hmmmm...
And what about the second laboratory bacteria, cloned from two original devastating outbreaks, that have leaked unto the American public in the last two months? Hmmmm...still no prolonged investigation by the media.
Why are we also hearing that some nurses and doctors are not taking the new inoculations because of new "additives" that are being placed into formally normal inoculations?
There is a lot of suspicion going on about our government. When will this be addressed and investigated at a higher news level?
From: Charles - Clarksville, Indiana (9/20/09)
My question is, when will the president of KHSAA be prosecuted? The Max Gilpin incident is a very tragic accident in athletics.
Mr. Stinson was the poster child of what football coaches should not do. As an athlete, you should know your strengths and weakness because we train our bodies according to the situation presented to us. When will Louisville, Kentucky fire its prosecutor because he clearly does not know the difference between an accident and someone who clearly did not care about human life?
I call on the prosecutors to resign. Apparently, they were after nationwide news coverage. If you want to protect these kids, start football in October or November both in Kentucky and Indiana. My dad said it would interfere with basketball, but football is only played once a week. Designate Friday nights for football and play basketball on Tuesday and Saturdays until January.
This is another abuse. An elected official uses a situation to promote his own agenda or make a change that should have happened years ago.
From: Bob - Taylorsville, Kentucky (9/20/09)
Mr. Lamb, the only thing I have to argue with you today is the filth that comes from the broadcasting of Fox 41 when it comes to the adult animated sitcoms such as "Family Guy" and "The Simpsons." When the prosecutor of Mr. Stinson was asked if he would like Mr. Stinson coaching his children, he paused and said "No -- no I wouldn't."
Along the same lines, I have to ask you: Would you let your small children watch "The Simpsons," in which the son tells his father, "Eat my Shorts?" I don't know what other garbage comes from the mouths of these cartoon characters, because I do not watch the foul-mouthed show. Has it gone so far that we/I/you cannot stop the filth that's trying to be comical? Do sex and foul language have to be present in every show to make ratings?
As far as your views, I think they are all right and really hit the nail on the head. But I have to ask you, are you a hypocrite? If you want to improve your city with your views, shouldn't you start with your station?
From: Jillian - Louisville (9/14/09)
My point of view on the situation involving Kanye West and Taylor Swift at the Video Music Awards is if Beyonce did win and a white artist went and interrupted her speech and said basically that Taylor Swift should have won, I'd wonder if that would have been considered racist. But that hasn't even been brought up in this situation and I think it was a racial act because Kanye thought another African-American should have won when Taylor Swift definitely deserved to win.
From: Greg - Campbellsburg, Kentucky (9/13/09)
I viewed the Editorial Comments of Mr. Lamb concerning the statements of Baron Hill during "his" town-hall meeting, and I must say that if I were a resident of Indiana, I would be vocally calling for an IMMEDIATE impeachment of Mr. Hill! His "power" has obviously gone to his head and he has lost his mind - - not unlike Pelosi, Frank, Schumar and Reid!
From: George - Sellersburg, Indiana (9/10/09)
In regards to Baron Hill's town hall meeting -- I have given up calling his office on any issues. He does not listen to the people his is representing. Sad to say I do not have a voice.
From: Tom - Louisville (9/10/09)
I see and hear many people debating health care. What I do not hear is the President or his posse debating anything. They are dictating what and how it will be done and by when.
When President Kennedy challenged the nation to send a man to the moon and back, neither he, nor Congress, did the math, engineering, design or testing. They got experts to do it. Why not allow experts, none of whom are elected, define the problems with healthcare and design a better application for all? The President and Congress should then champion a well thought out, designed and run plan that has to be better than the 1800-page undefined mess they are shoving at us today.
You don't want a lawyer, teacher, senator, representative, or president to operate on you, so why let them direct something this important?
Also, on another subject -
If I ruled the world, police would have to follow the same traffic laws they enforce on everyone else. Watch any major intersection in town and you will see marked and unmarked cars running red lights. If it was not yellow when I do it, it is red when they do it!
Also, to those who smoke: Tired of being picked on? How about cleaning up after yourselves? Stop lights are not signals to empty your ash trays onto the pavement. You have the right to smoke, so how about showing you understand the responsibilities that go along with it?
Remember, those other people do see you!
From: Sue - Harned, Kentucky (9/10/09)
I want to comment on the story you ran about the Breckinridge County football players going to the church service. First of all, these players all voluntarily went with the coach to the service and were aware where they were going. It's not any different than if he took them bowling or to any other event that took place outside of school.
I just want to say that I'm proud to be in a county where our teachers and coaches are trying to promote "good" activities in our youth. I'm sure you heard of our county's recent tragic car accident where two youths were killed after attending a party where alcohol was being used. I bet if you asked their parents today, they would have been very grateful if their children had been in attendance at a church service getting baptized instead of out "drinking and dying!"
Maybe someone should remind Ms. Ammons and the other "irate" parents that if these children have parents that don't want them to better themselves, then no wonder they are out looking for mentors to be a more positive example for them!
From: Amy - Hardinsburg, Kentucky (9/10/09)
I think if the Breckinridge County football players went to a church willingly to hear a motivational speaker and then the felt Jesus in their hearts and got baptized, that's great. A lot of people never feel that feeling and with all the young people this town has lost in tragic accidents in the last six months, I think it's great!
From: Patti - Louisville (9/10/09)
On the controversial baptism of the Breckinridge County football players:
This was not a mandatory field trip. The parents had to know that their kids were going. As far as the baptism, students made that choice themselves. The coach or administration would not be able to stop a student because that is a decision between them and God. That is not even a decision that we, as parents, can make for our kids. That is something they have to decide for themselves.
The parents that are complaining and wanting to sue are just looking at dollar signs. The only thing the mother who spoke on Fox news has done is embarrassed her son. Everyone wants to find easy money. The mother may want to rethink that decision.
What is more important? Money or your son?
From: Terry - Hardinsburg, Kentucky (9/10/09)
Residents of Breckinridge County just buried two students that attended Breckinridge County High School -- one of which played football last year. If those parents could have made a choice between their children attending a party that took their lives or a church service, I think they would have chosen the church service.
I commend our football players and the coach, and feel sorry for the parents for stirring all of this trouble.
From: Thomas - Brooks, Kentucky (9/10/09)
If I ruled the world, I would impose a hefty tax on all sweeteners, i.e. sugar, corn sweeteners, etc. To be fair, I'd also tax all artificial sweeteners. This would be a huge source of revenue and really help solve the obesity problem which is so prevalent.
Science will tell you a human can live a healthy long life without ever ingesting any sugar except what occurs naturally in fruits and vegetables. Let's do this for the children.
From: Jennifer - Louisville (9/9/09)
What is outrageous is the outrage over the decisions the football players made who decided to get baptized. That was their decision to make, not their parents' and certainly not yours or mine. I'm proud of them and it is ridiculous that some of the parents are considering "legal action."
This country was founded with freedom FOR religion, not freedom FROM religion.
From: Dorian - Trinity, Florida (9/9/09)
It is outrageous that the football players in Breckinridge County were baptized without their parents' permission. Could you imagine if a Jewish coach took players to a temple for a special motivational speech? You people in Kentucky would be having a meltdown.
Religion doesn't belong in school sports. Period!
From: Roscoe - Louisville (9/9/09)
If I ruled the world, people would have to apply to have children, meeting guidelines such as having a job, being married, being able to provide health insurance and passing a background check. It seems too easy for people to have children when they have no means of providing for them or they let someone else take care of their kids.
You know who you are -- the holiday parents of the world that take credit during Christmas and anytime that is convenient for them. These are the people that are a true drain on society. Why should working class Americans pay tax money that goes to help you when you won't help yourself? Go to a job fair or something...please.
From: David - Louisville (9/9/09)
If I ruled the world, I would require WDRB to put a trailer at the bottom of any show for one week's time when it will air in a different time slot the next week. I tape certain weekday afternoon shows and watch them on the weekend. But I frequently find out I have taped a show in which I have no interest. I would require WDRB to match the courtesy given to viewers by the three other network affiliates.
If I ruled the world, I would require WDRB to have a morning show on weekends and holidays like the three other network affiliates. Mark is, by far, the best meteorologist in town, and to not have him available in an emergency weather situation is shameful.
If WDRB wants to run with the three big boys, they should program like the big boys.
From: Jesse - Elizabeth, Indiana (9/8/09)
If I ruled the world:
1. English would be the national language. Everyone would be required to at least learn English as their second language.
2. We would close our borders. Anyone caught twice illegally crossing the border would be shot.
3. We would bring our troops back and have them run the borders.
4. We would do away with income tax and start the Fair Tax plan.
5. Any prisoner convicted of crimes against children would be put to death after one year.
6. All vending machines would be required to take pennies.
We would do away with child support. Custody should be 50/50. Only the cost of schooling and insurance should be split.
8. A driving test would be required every four years.
9. Guns would be allowed to be carried openly - everywhere -- by those who pass a background check.
10. The highest paid jobs would be the military, police, and firefighters -- not sports stars.
11. There would be term limits for anyone elected in government -- ten years max.
12. Credit cards would become illegal and the credit card companies shut down.
From: Crystal - Louisville (9/8/09)
If I ruled the world:
-Government assistance would only be available for 60 days upon passing a drug test. After 60 days you would have to provide proof of hardship to continue receiving benefits for another 30 days.
-All families with kids in the house would receive a set amount of free milk/eggs/bread/cheese per month.
-Any female with two or more kids who has been on welfare longer than six months, or gets pregnant with a third child, would be forced to get her tubes tied! Stop mooching off my family's hard earned money!
-Fathers not paying child support, child molesters and rapists would be forced to have vasectomies.
-ALL forms of birth control would be free to anyone over the age of 13.
-Spanking wouldn't be "wrong".
From: Harold - Louisville (9/8/09)
If I ruled the world, circuses wouldn't be allowed to have animal acts, rodeos would be outlawed, I would close down all confined animal feeding operations (aka factory farms), no animals could be raised for their fur, there would be no testing allowed on animals for any reason, nobody would be allowed to own exotic pets such as lions, tigers, alligators, snakes, monkeys or apes, and pets would have the same protection under the law as do children.
From: Penny - Hardinsburg, Kentucky (9/8/09)
I watched a news report on the Breckinridge County incident involving high school football players being taken to another county to be baptized. My son is a football player and he came home days before the meal and told me about the meal being prepared by the church, and yes -- we did know about the revival.
The boys were told that they did not have to go and it was strictly up to them if they wanted to go. These young men are not two years old anymore. They have the ability to make up their own minds if they want to come to Christ.
I do not feel that the coach has tried to push Christ down anyone's throat, and I am very upset with the fact if you believe in Christ that you have to not say a word about Him.
From: Betty - Louisville (9/8/09)
If I ruled the world, I would make all government officials -- the President, Congress, etc -- have to have the same social security program and health programs as all the rest of the people do. If it worked for them, then we could handle it.
From: Susan - Greenvile, Indiana (9/8/09)
I am one of the parents that are keeping their children home from school today due to the Obama address directed at school children. I have no objection to the President speaking to children. My objection is the government-directed lesson plans and directing discussion with my children which will more than likely lead to teacher-directed discussions regarding politics and expressions of the teachers' opinions regarding present political hot points.
I want my children to develop their own opinions and at impressionable ages and feel like a government-directed lesson plan centered on this presidential address is just another way to indoctrinate my children into an agenda that I, as a parent and a voting citizen, do not agree with.
From: Jeana - Floyds Knobs, Indiana (9/4/09)
I would like to reply to your "Darts and Laurels" from September 3, 2009 -- especially the Dart to David Mour.
I completely support Mr. Mour in his fight against the City of Louisville's parking fines. You say he leaves out the part that if you pay your fine early you get a discount. However, Mr. Lamb, the part that you leave out is that the city is required by law to send notice of the parking infringements.
They still are not following the law! I received a parking ticket not too long ago and although I normally pay my fines on time, I deliberately waited to see if I would get notice from the city, but I didn't. So kudos to Mr. Mour for making the city abide by the law!
Do you want to live in a city or country where the government can break the law without consequences, but expects the citizens to follow the laws or pay an extra exorbitant amount in fines when they may have no knowledge of their infringement? I don't.
Good Luck Mr. Mour. Without people like you, who knows if we would have America!
From: Rhonda - Ekron, Kentucky (8/29/09)
Regarding the Rick Pitino/Karen Sypher story:
I watch the news at least two times a day. I don't ever recall you airing the tapes from another rape victim. I feel that this shows disrespect to the women, who through no fault of their own, are in this situation. Let what happened between those two be resolved in court.
If you truly want inform the public, show us the pictures of the men who have been convicted of rape and are about to be released so we will know who the real threat is to those of us that are not in the public eye and not out to get paid.
From: James - Marengo, Indiana (8/29/09)
Nowadays in school science classes, students are taught that the Big Bang created the universe. I am outraged that the only thing that children are taught is the atheist belief on the creation of the universe, especially in a nation where most people believe in God. The Big Bang Theory, which any scientist will admit is still questionable, is all that I can find in a science book or on the Discovery Channel. Why is it that all that is allowed on television or in school books is the belief of one minority group -- the atheists? Until someone can go back several billion years in time and prove to me that the Big Bang actually happened, it's time the separation of church and state separated atheism from state, too.
From: Doug - Sellersburg, Indiana (8/29/09)
I am very sorry to see there is no coverage in the Louisville market of the Cincinnati Reds.
There should be some hometown pride. The Louisville Bats are the AAA affiliate of the Reds.
From: Jonathan - Louisville (8/29/09)
Good to see you have gone the way of WHAS 84 -- screw the hometown team's parent club (Reds). Why on earth do we have to watch the perennial loser Cubs that have no ties whatever to Louisville? Six of the nine starters for the Reds today have played for the Bats within the last two years, and four of them have played for the Bats this year.
The local media never ceases to amaze me around here. Hopefully I will at least get to watch the Cubs get the @#!! beat out of them.
From: Rhonda - Louisville (8/28/09)
Bill Lamb is a typical hypocrite news person. On 8/13/09 he encourages everyone to "not rush judgment on Pitino," but then turns around on 8/27/09 and states exactly the opposite. Why? Because Pitino had the nerve to down the media for reporting lies. That is the only reason!
From: Terry - Bardstown, Kentucky (8/28/09)
If I were sitting in the back seat of the car that you were driving and told you to speed and drive recklessly, would I be the one responsible for that act? Of course not. It is always the driver (operator) of the vehicle that is responsible for operating it in accordance with the law. You are trying to mislead the public that it was the car dealership's fault for that horrible accident. It was the driver and no one else.
From: Tim - Brooks, Kentucky (8/28/09)
Bill, I could not agree with you more regarding college coaches. I am very turned off by the substance abuse and lewd behavior in most sports these days by both coaches and players at the collegiate and pro levels. However, if the fans don't hold them accountable, I'm afraid it will never stop.
From: Mark - Louisville (8/27/09)
I agree with Coach Pitino -- your job is to report facts, not lies. It says something when the federal government and police departments are saying that his accuser is lying. I hate Fox News, but I did give you guys a chance. But this really shows that all Fox News outlets are the same. But I guess that's what you get when the News Director is a UK grad.
I will never watch your network ever again.
(Editor's Note: WDRB News Director Barry Fulmer is a graduate of Central Pennsylvania College in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. He has never attended the University of Kentucky.)
From: Gina - New Albany, Indiana (8/27/09)
I am weary of men with the morals of alley cats being applauded regularly in the media. Cheers to Bill Lamb for courageously taking the road less traveled -- integrity.
From: Bill - Louisville (8/27/09)
Just saw and heard Bill Lamb's opinion on Rick Pitino. If he's the Pope, where's his hat? I watch Barry and Candyce every morning and love the show, but I will never watch 41 again. Bill Lamb has made many poor decisions concerning this whole situation. Replace Bill Lamb.
From: Jill - Louisville (8/27/09)
Has our community forgotten we pay Rick Pitino's salary? His ego is expansive, rightfully so, for what he has accomplished in his career. However, due to our public information laws, Fox and all other media outlets have a right to let their community hear how our tax dollars are being spent.
Regardless of whether you're a U of L or U of K supporter, would you want your son (age 18 through 22) to watch and respect a person who is getting paid (by yourself) to get drunk (in his own words) in a public place and finally act out due to the fact they got caught?
We, as a public, try to teach our children to face up to their mistakes and take their punishments. What makes Pitino or Karen Sypher any different?
From: Ron - Clarksville, Indiana (8/27/09)
Airing the police interview with Karen Sypher was in poor taste and a disservice to the process.
From: Mike - Louisville (8/27/09)
I think it is interesting that Pitino called a press conference to complain about the press coverage. How much more news did he create by doing this?
From: Shannon - Louisville (8/27/09)
I think Candyce's Clifft's discretion was remarkable. In the face of a story that would have been sensational, she remained very professional and stuck to the facts as they became facts, and not just hearsay. I think it's sad to see two people be so immature, but it is not the reporters' fault when they report facts. It is the fault of those two people being exposed, and they should stop blaming everyone else or trying to hide behind their respective families.
From: David - Louisville (8/27/09)
I am a Fox 41 fan, but I think airing the Karen Sypher police interview was a mistake. After hearing the interview the police found her allegations to be without merit and choose not to prosecute coach Pitino. After a similar interview with the FBI, she was charged with trying to profit from bringing false charges.
It was also recently reported that Karen Sypher has a history of claiming to be pregnant and shaking down the alleged father for financial gain.
The claim of rape is a very serious charge. When the charge is falsely claimed it cheapens the process. Some women may choose not to press charges because they don't want to be looked at as suspiciously as most people view Karen Sypher.
Airing an interview that was judged to be without merit is not news. She concluded the interview by asking her interviewer, "This will get out - right?" Her intentions were clear, and you helped her accomplish her goal. Anyone that forwards her false accusations has played right into her hands.
A news organization does not have the "responsibility" to air both sides of the story if one side of the story has been proven to be illegitimate. It smacks of sensationalism.
From: Michelle - Jeffersonville, Indiana (8/27/09)
Thank you Billy Gillispie for the DUI, but it's still not enough to take the light off your buddy Rick. What's Rick trying to hide now that he doesn't want you to find? Keep digging!
From: Wayne - Radcliff, Kentucky (8/27/09)
I feel that the Rick Pitino should have kept himself in his pants. Now that he has to answer up, he wants to control the news as he controls his team. He made his bed on he has to lie in it. I feel that he's done this before and this time he got caught.
From: Betty - Louisville (8/27/09)
I think Rick Pinto made a bad choice. He is a role model for a lot of young men and should behave a lot better than most. I think if Karen Sypher was thinking of even having sex when going to the restaurant, she would have been using some type of protection. Her children are grown.
There will be more coverage when the trial begins.
From: Greg - Louisville (8/27/09)
I know someone that has encountered Karen Sypher in the past, and from what I have heard, she is very forward and aggressive toward men. I don't trust her as far as I could throw her. I think she's a gold digger.
Stay strong, Rick.
From: Debora - Louisville (8/27/09)
Why do we even consider this Pitino-Sypher story our business? It has NOTHING to do with basketball, so leave the coach alone. Though Ms. Sypher has obviously sought media attention (strange for a rape victim!), she appears to have issues that are also best for everyone if kept out of the media. Who is benefiting from the media attention? Certainly not the University of Louisville, not Rick Pitino or his family and definitely not Ms. Sypher. PLEASE STOP.
If you choose to cover the trial, please limit coverage to the verdict only, if anything at all. It's just a tragic situation all the way around. Isn't there something more important to cover during the news coverage?
From: Robin - Clarksville, Indiana (8/27/09)
I am furious with Rick Pitino. I feel that he has brought this all on himself. Had he not had sex with her he would not be in the spot light! Also, if he would have told the truth at the beginning and not acted like the victim, he would not have this problem. He gets what he earned.
From: Paula - Corydon, Indiana (8/27/09)
You should inform the public of facts, report allegations once and let the truth come out in court. I will turn back to cable news because of the repetitiveness. If Barry Bernson were accused of rape that was unsubstantiated, would you report it like you are in Rick's case?
From: Richard - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (8/27/09)
Coach Pitino has disgraced U of L and I think that he should be replaced. More and more I see America's standards and morals declining. We need to hold each other accountable for poor conduct and expect better behavior from our leaders, .
From: Krista - Greenville, Indiana (8/27/09)
It's time to move on past the Pitino scandal. I'm tired of hearing about how he had sex in a restaurant and I cringe every time it is covered. I have to change the channel when my kids are around because I don't want them to ask me any questions about it. My heart also goes out to Pitino's wife. She is innocent in all this and has to relive this horrible infidelity every time she turns on the TV. Please cover something else.
From: Sarah - Louisville (8/27/09)
Rick Pitino has a lot of nerve getting upset about media coverage, etc. If he had kept his pants on six years ago he wouldn't be having this trouble now. I think he is a pig and not a very good role model for his players and other young people in the community who look up to him.
From: Tony - Mount Washington, Kentucky (8/27/09)
What if Louisville's media ran Rick Pitino off and left the city with an empty, brand new, but hardly used, basketball arena? Would the media accept responsibility?
What if Coach Pitino said enough is enough of the local media's assault and left to
coach somewhere else? , Would Louisville's media accept any responsibility?
What would the local media then say when U of L Basketball dropped to the bottom
of the NCAA all because the media persisted in crucifying Coach Pitino and chose to
keep listening to a crazy, vindictive woman? Would the media say something like, "Yes, it was our fault. We are responsible for causing Rick Pitino to leave the University of Louisville?"
Coach Pitino has said he was not going to leave Louisville and coach anywhere else, but the way the Louisville media is treating him, could anyone blame him for choosing to go elsewhere? And if he did choose to leave Louisville because of the way the media is treating him, would the members of the local media accept responsibility? Accept any responsibility at all?
Doubtful! All the media would do is report how unused the new arena is, how much
money was lost/wasted on it, how bad U of L basketball is and then place the blame
on some poor sap of their own choosing or anyone/everyone else besides themselves
instead of admitting they took the Pitino reporting way too far!
Enough is enough, stop before you run a good man and great basketball coach away
from the area. In simpler terms...SHUT UP! Would the local media treat one of their
own the way they treat the Coach? I am sure there are members of the local media
around here that have or are doing worse then Pitino, but those transgressions
will not be made public. And if they were, they would be 'played down' into nothing.
A famous man once said something along the lines of, "Fear not your enemy because
he can only take your life. Fear the press (media) because they WILL steal your
honor!"
And probably run a good man and great basketball coach away from Louisville!
There must be a lot of former UK alumni working in Louisville's media, still angry with him for leaving their school, who must want him to leave U of L basketball. Why else would the Louisville media try so hard to run him off?
From: William - Charlestown, Indiana (8/26/09)
I only wish you would leave coach Pinto alone along with his family. Let this story die. Why don't you show more on this woman? Has she been raped before? The Louisville Police did not believe her story. No one knows what happened between two adults. Why would you put this tape of her on TV? Do you know it's the 100% truth?
Please let this man heal with his family. I think you were unfair to Rick and his family
From: Donald - Louisville (8/26/09)
After the cheap, yellow type of reporting I witnessed on your station pertaining to Coach Pitino, I will no longer view your newscast. Your sports department and the teasers leading to commercials were way over the top. You all should be ashamed.
From: Joe - Jeffersonville, Indiana (8/26/09)
Are you trying to run coach Pitino out of town? I'm sick of hearing this crazy woman's accusations and disappointed that you're participating in her trying to ruin the man. Sure he did something he probably shouldn't have, but who cares? it was NOT ILLEGAL! What she has done IS ILLEGAL! And you keep airing her desperate accusations for money.
Come on really, you're crucifying the wrong person, and you're tormenting what's going to be an innocent man. I guess you won't quit until he leaves Louisville or ends up divorced!
I used to love watching your news coverage, but this has gone too far.
From: Tim - Shelbyville, Kentucky (8/26/09)
Regarding the Rick Pitino news that you have been reporting -- It seems like you just want to bust on him all the time. You seem to say the wrong things at the wrong time. I've been watching Fox 41 since you first came on. This is probably one of the worst things that you have done. Remember, "He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone."
I will no longer be watching Fox 41. You have stooped low. In with Rick, out with 41.
From: Pat - Louisville (8/26/09)
Enough is enough! Claiming to have "crucial evidence," you air a video of an interview of a woman who, by all accounts, made up most of the allegations except the one that the man admits to (and the police and HER OWN ATTORNEY say she's creative), and claim it's journalism. Well, the National Enquirer lives on half-truths and innuendos. This is beneath journalism and Candyce Clifft. Let the man alone. All parties think this woman needs psychiatric help, yet your attempt at exploitation lends credibility where there isn't any, and it's to your discredit.
From: Mark - Louisville (8/26/09)
In your "Point of View" piece on cyclists, you seemed to imply that NO cyclists deserve respect or legal protection until ALL cyclists comply with ALL traffic laws. Surely that's not what you meant.
By that logic, it would be okay for me to egg your car or run you off the road because another motorist pulled out in front of me in traffic yesterday.
From: Cheryl - South Lyon, Michigan (8/26/09)
You'll notice by my address that I do not live in Louisville. I am, however, an active member of the Louisville Bicycle Club. I have ridden my bicycle in the Louisville area more than 1,000 miles this year alone, so please consider my opinion to be that of a local cyclist as well.
I am confident that all responsible cyclists , will agree with the editorial video, and we welcome enforcement of traffic laws whether the violators are cyclists or motorists. I would like to expand upon one of your points. You criticize cyclists who ride the sidewalk then dart out into traffic, implying that it may be acceptable to ride on the sidewalk, so long as the cyclist stays there. It is NEVER acceptable for an adult cyclist to ride on the sidewalk. It is illegal, and highly dangerous.
I would also like to describe some legal behavior that responsible cyclists engage in that some very vocal motorists find objectionable, and explain why we do it.
1) When we approach a stop sign, we often don't put a foot on the ground. That doesn't mean we haven't stopped. Many cyclists can "track stand" for several minutes wh, ile waiting for a light to change. Staying clipped in to the pedal allows us to get up to speed more quickly when it is our turn to proceed. We also have greater directional stability, as we're not shifting body position to push off and get back to the pedal. Both the cyclist and the motorist get to proceed more quickly and safely when we do this.
2) When we ride in groups and come to a stop sign, we proceed as a group (after waiting our turn). The cyclists in the middle or back of the group may not actually come to a complete stop, but will slow enough to verify that it is safe to proceed, and to stop if necessary. While this may not be strictly legal, it is safer and more efficient for us AND for the motorist. No motorist wants to sit behind a group of cyclists while each pulls up individually to a four-way stop and waits his turn to proceed.
3) A cyclist may ride in the center of the lane, instead of near the right edge, when he feels it is unsafe for a motorist to pass without crossing into the oncoming lane. This is legal. We may do this when curves or hills ahead obstruct the view of oncoming traffic. We have all had motorists attempting to pass us, only to have an oncoming car appear around the corner. Nothing good ever comes from this situation, and the cyclist is the most likely to be seriously injured or killed. We may also do it when the pavement is very rough, or has potholes near the edge. Our narrow, high-pressure tires are not as capable of handling these conditions as car tires are. If we hit a pavement defect, and are thrown from the bike, the motorist runs over us. Most likely the time the motorist loses due to the crash will be a more significant part of his day than the time he has to wait for a safe opportunity to pass.
4) When riding in a group, we may remain two abreast when a motor vehicle approaches from the rear. This is not an act of defiance, and is not illegal. Most traffic lanes are not wide enough for a motorist to safely pass even a solo cyclist without crossing into the oncoming lane. If we fall into single-file formation, the motorist needs the opening in oncoming traffic to be twice as long as he would if we remain two abreast.
Most cyclists are not attempting to provoke motorists. When tempers flare, the cyclist ALWAYS loses. There are irresponsible cyclists out there, just as there are irresponsible drivers. But most of us are doing our best to improve the flow of motorized traffic, even though the motorist may not always see it that way.
From: Franklin - Louisville (8/26/09)
Why do I need to pay for the cost of creating and maintaining bicycle lanes? The bikers should be required to purchase a permit and a little reflector sticker behind their seat. It should cost 25 to 50 dollars a year to pay for paint and signs and asphalt. They also should be required to have liability insurance because they also cause accidents.
They need to obey street laws. If I were to do 10 to 12 mph down US 42 or LaGrange Road in my car, I would be fined for not maintaining a minimum of 35 mph, but the bikers are allowed to slow down the roadways.
From: Christopher - Clarksville, Indiana (08/25/09)
As a resident of the Kentuckiana area, I heard about the recent crash involving a test driven car at 100 mph, killing two people. I believe the driver of the car is guilty of manslaughter because of the high rate of speed that he was traveling. But on the outside looking in, this happens every day.
I buy cars frequently and visit the local car dealerships to purchase the new offerings of the automotive industry often. As a customer on a test drive I have been told on many different accounts to push the car to its limits to see if I like its performance at a high rate of speed.
Would I have thought this is wrong a couple of weeks ago? The answer is no. But looking more deeply into this situation now that two people are dead, I think that it is.
The daughter of the one of the victims stated that the driver AND the sales representative should be put in jail for a very long time. I disagree with part of that. How can a sales representative prevent this from happening other than saying "slow down" or "pull this car over?" They cannot do it. They don't have control of the driver's right foot nor the left.
I don't think that the sales representative should be punished at all. He was doing his job by trying to sell a car. If the customer had asked to see how the car would drive at a high rate of speed, t, he dealership could have taken the customer to a closed course to try the car out. But a passenger in a car yelling at the driver of a multiple thousand pound machine to slow down isn't going to help the situation out or even stop it because they aren't the one behind the wheel.
I think the driver of the vehicle should be punished to the extent of the law but not the sales person.
From: Cody - Palmyra, Indiana (8/24/09)
We had concert tickets to go see Keith Urban Saturday night (Aug 22) at the Kentucky State Fair. We were in the logjam of traffic for over two hours and parked on Preston and walked the last mile to avoid completely missing the concert. If we had stayed in our vehicle we would have been in traffic for upwards of three hours.
The disorganization and lack of traffic management was the worst I have seen in my lifetime and I have been to events all over the world. Leave it to Kentucky to put on the worst state fair in the world.
Whoever was or is in charge of traffic management should be fired immediately. It completely took the fun out of what should have been a fun event. How many patrons and how much money is the fair losing (per hour) w, hile literally thousands of people sit in their cars? It's utterly appalling.
This Hoosier will avoid the Kentucky State Fair at all costs in the future. Another embarrassment to the state of Kentucky and an utter debacle!
From: Shannon - Louisville (8/19/09)
I had applied for a hardship transfer on July 23 for my daughter so she could attend Auburndale Elemen, tary and JCPS still hasn't given me a response. They just say they will send something in the mail.
I am angry. The law says we have to send our children to school, but we can't get them in the school of our choice. It's just amazing how if you don't send them to school for five days unexcused they can take you to court. But if you apply for a hardship, it could be three weeks before they can go to school
From: Shawn - Clarksville, Indiana (8/19/09)
I do not understand why FEMA will not help people in Southern Indiana who were affected by the recent flood. My road was totally flooded on August 4th, as were my neighbors'. I lost my car and lots of personal items.
I am on disability and cannot afford to replace these things. What about us?
From: Raymond - Louisville (8/16/09)
I believe there's a lot more to the Karen Sypher / Rick Pitino story. It's just too convenient for her to have married Pitino's equipment manager.
As for the return of Michael Vick -- why not? The NFL is full of convicted felons.
From: Lauren - Louisville (8/14/09)
I feel like it would be silly to fire Rick Pitino over all the information that's recently been revealed. Men and women have affairs every day, and usually those men and women have careers that are not ended because of them.
I don't feel like Pitino's case should be any different. He came out and admitted exactly what he did and apologized to everyone involved and NOT involved, and as a community, we should be able to look past it.
From: Sandra - Austin, Indiana (8/14/09)
A nation is only as strong as its leaders and its morals. I can see a rapid moral decay in our country.
,
Any time a person is in charge of youths, they are responsible for how they represent themselves in front of kids. The average person on the street would lose their job or their license to teach, or be put in jail for immoral conduct.
I don't understand why there are two codes of conduct for men and women. There also seem to be two codes of conduct for the rich and famous and for the normal citizen. Why is that?
I think too much value is placed on athletics anyway. As my mom says, "they should be out hoeing corn!" They need a real job. It seems too much value is placed on people with too much money and not enough values.
As I tell my own students, "You are responsible for your own actions." I say Coach Pitino should be fired. Let him spend the rest of his life reflecting upon and thinking about his actions. Too much is at stake trying to mold and shape the youth in our country.
It seems history has a way of always repeating itself. We never learn. Rome burned and Sodom was destroyed. How can we escape by making the same decisions they did? We won't escape.
Children and young people look up to their teachers and coaches. Why not be a real model and live a decent life in public and in the private sector? It feels good to be able to be that example and to be able to sleep at night.
No wonder we're losing them to drugs, alcohol, sex and all the other things that can kill, destroy, or put them in jail for a lifetime.
It's time to take America back. Let's live the life before them. I don't buy into the excuse, "What they do in private doesn't matter."
I beg your pardon. It really does matter.
From: Brittney - Louisville (8/13/09)
Although I do not believe Pitino's personal life should be a determining factor regarding whether he should keep his job with U of L or not, I would hate to see U of L apply a double standard.
If you recall, Becca Manns, a Louisville cheerleader, was expelled from the school when her personal pictures were exposed by an angry ex-boyfriend. Becca was not given a second chance, let alone a chance to explain herself. As humiliating as it was for her, she was in a committed relationship at the time the photos in question were taken.
Not to point the finger, but Mr. Pitino was caught in the act of adultery which has led to this overblown scandal. I would think that by allowing him to stay employed, U of L would be demonstrating a double standard and an unfair approach to how they handled Becca Manns' situation.
From: Becky - Lanesville, Indiana (8/12/09)
We don't have the best healthcare in the world for the masses, only an elite few. I pay for my own health insurance which I can't afford, it doesn't cover much of anything, I can't afford to use it and the premium is going up again next month.
The cost of health care and health insurance needs to come down by a large percentage and then a cap should be placed on the prices. No individual should be turned down for coverage because of problems with their health. No claims should be denied by insurance companies when it comes to an individual's health.
Yes, we do need health care reform because insurance companies should not be allowed to play God with people.
From: Arthur - Louisville (8/10/09)
Has the mayor gone into flooded areas? Why doesn't the city pick up contaminated contents of houses at the curb? Do they know cars and trucks have been lost? Why cite people in affected areas for putting sewage-contaminated items on the curb? Why not have junk pick dates changed for the affected areas during this emergency? Why is FEMA not involved? Why is there nowhere to find how to get help on metrolouisville.gov?
It sounds to me as if the city of Louisville is not there for the people when they need help.
From: James - Marengo, Indiana (8/8/09)
If I ruled the world, school would be focused less on work and m, ore on educating students. Nowadays, students spend more time working then learning. Homework should be just a little review to make sure students are listening, and should therefore not take up much class time.
From: Terry - Louisville (8/7/09)
I am outraged at the riot that broke out yesterday at the free back-to-school concert and supply giveaway. Do I understand correctly that this was financed by the Metro Council (and our tax money)? If those children cannot behave any better than they do at these free events and show some appreciation, I do not feel they deserve to have them. No one is giving my children anything free for back-to-school, and I do not wish to have my tax money spent on such ungrateful children.
From: Donald - Louisville (8/7/09)
In response to Mr. Lamb's "If I Ruled the World" Point of View, I have one major hang-up that I would fix first thing. I cannot understand why MADD has not complained about it.
If it is illegal to drink and drive -- and I do believe that it is -- why do liquor stores have drive-up windows and why do gas stations sell beer? It seems to me that something is out of whack here.
From: Tracy - Louisville (8/6/09)
I think Bill Lamb should do a "Point of View" on the gas prices that go up a few days before events such as the Street Rod Nationals, the Derby, Thunder and others. I have lived here for several years and always notice the increase right before an event which is supposed to help our economy.
Does gouging the residents of this community really help our economy??
From: Jessica - Jeffersonville, Indiana (8/5/09)
I just wanted to tell Mr. Lamb what a great job he does on Point of View. I couldn't have agreed more with the one he did the other day called "If I Ruled the World." I received a computer virus two weeks ago on my work computer. Thankfully, it did not destroy my work files, but it was still a mess. My boss had to reset the entire computer. It took almost two days for him to fix it. It is sad that we can't go after the person that sent it.
From: Justen - Louisville (8/6/09)
Has Bill Lamb considered running for Louisville mayor? Since the beginning of his POV segment,, I always catch myself saying afterwards, "Bill Lamb for Mayor." His opinions seem to always have the city's best interest at heart. Whether dealing with support of our police department, the new bridges or the arena, Mr. Lamb always has great, middle of the road ideas; neither too liberal or too conservative.
Bill Lamb would be a great leader for this community, as he is for FOX41. If it has not been considered, it really should be!
From: Robbie - Charlestown, Indiana (8/5/09)
For the last several days we have been bombarded with pictures of perfectly good cars being placed in dumpsters at big new car dealerships advertising the new CASH FOR CLUNKERS program. Traditionally, these cars were referred to as new car trades and they were assigned a cash value and used as a down payment toward the price of a new car. These cars were then re-sold to people who couldn't afford to buy a new car or just didn't want to, or taken to an auto auction and sold to public individuals or to smaller dealerships who would, in turn, offer the credit to the poorer people that might have the credit rating required to purchase a vehicle at the larger dealerships, and sell them for smaller and more frequent payments that more people living from paycheck-to-paycheck can afford to pay.
This CASH FOR CLUNKERS program has clearly made money for the big auto companies and has subsequently generated substantial revenue for the state governments through state taxes from the sale of new vehicles. Meanwhile, good, hard working, honest, poor people who are working for minimum wage or close to it are forced to drive by these new car dealerships on their way to their minimum wage jobs everyday and see these cars that are better than the ones they are driving, sticking out of dumpsters. This is sad, and I wonder if the owners of these dealerships are proud of the fact that they are partially responsible for permanently taking these good cars out of circulation. The answer is, they don't care because they were paid very handsomely for them.
Please stop stealing from the poor and giving it to the , rich! I'm not sure how much more the poor people can take. After all, they are the ones with the softest voice you know. They've helped you, now please help them.
This program is only helping the big auto companies and new car dealerships, the government and the people with the best jobs and the best credit ratings, while it is putting the smaller dealerships out of business and making it harder for the poor people to afford basic transportation. If you don't have a car, you cannot drive to work. As of today, lawmakers are trying to pass legislation that , would give the auto companies another two billion dollars through the Cash for Clunkers program. But they will not even release the final statistics for the first one billion. And some are even admitting that it may have done more harm than good.
Where do you get your money? Oh, now I remember -- FROM US! STOP IT! An older vehicle that gets less than 20 miles per gallon might not mean much to you, but it might mean everything to the people who prepare your meals at your favorite restaurant, the people that stand outside in the weather and pump your gas in your big 12-mile-per-gallon SUVs so you don't have to. The list really does go on and on.
Let's start an initiative that actually helps the poor people and see if that works.
From: Paul - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (8/5/09)
If I ruled the USA, the right to vote would be rescinded. America gets the government it deserves simply because they can vote. Most don't bother, most who do vote for comfort or party. Now you say this lacks representation, but wait. Instead of voting, the offices would be filled by lottery, like the military draft. Your number comes up and it is yours. One term and done. Can't be inherited can't be bought and can't waste billions of taxpayer dollars on campaigns. Also, you then have to go back to live with the laws you made.
Politicians will never give themselves term limits. After all, most politicians are lawyers that are not good enough at that to practice law. Give control to the common man and money will be real and laws will be short and understandable.
From: Allen - Louisville (8/5/09)
In watching the one of the newscasts this morning, it was mentioned that gas prices are up due to the flooding. I would like to point out that the hike in gas prices had absolutely nothing to do with the flooding. There were gas stations raising the price of gas prior to 6:30AM yesterday morning, which was considerably before the rain or flooding. It is more likely that the hike in gas prices (the third in a week) is more related to the Street Rod Nationals event at the Fairgrounds. The gas prices in Louisville continue to be artificially inflated, and it is beyond me why this issue is not being addressed by anyone.
The media continues to be a puppet for whatever excuses the industry wants to give, with no questions asked.
From: Thad - Louisville (8/4/09)
Cash for Clunkers - Here's another government plan t, o get assets into the hands of the poor, much like the housing debacle we are experiencing. Buyers are going to have to find budget money for the car payment for the next five years and insurance funding for the car. When they find they can't make the payments, the repo man will come knocking and they'll be left without a car.
Here we go again -- not only homeless, but carless too.
Also, if I ruled the world:
1. Politicians who have been elected to office would be automatically impeached if found to be lying in the promises during their campaigns.
2. Heavy fines would be placed on any periodical or newscaster which published lies or rumors or partial truths.
3. Any judge who releases a convicted D, UI, and the convict does it again, should be disbarred.
From: Cecelia - Clarksville, Indiana (7/31/09)
Instead of two bridges, build one like the Sherman Minton Bridge to the side of the Kennedy Bridge. Then refurbish the Kennedy Bridge for semi-truck traffic only. The new one with over and under lanes would be for car vans and small trucks. That would keep down rush hour problems and avoid a lot of wrecks, too.
From: Bob - Louisville (7/31/09)
I would like to know why none of our senators have brought up the question as to how bad the Veterans Hospital and health care are being run and the problems that they are having, and compare that to what health care would be like if the government ran it. If the government can't give our veterans the help they need and deserve, how can they run health care for the entire country?
From: Sharon and Jay - Simpsonville, Kentucky (7/29/09)
Please address in POINT OF VIEW the problem with all the stimulus money for purchasing a new car. Does House Bill 3 state that it has to be built in America? Have you noticed all the cars built outside the United States on the street? How is the economy being helped when there is no mandate to purchase American-made cars to get the tax breaks, over giving workers in other countries a job at a much lower wage?
If the car is manufactured in the United States, then I agree with the tax break on the purchase of a new car. Does the new Chevy plant in Brazil help our economy, since our government is running Chevy now? What about having a 12 year-old car that does not qualify because when we purchased it the mileage was between 21-26 mpg?
When is the government going to stop helping everyone except the little man?
From: Mark - Louisville (7/29/09)
I think it is sad to watch Louisville try to get something done. They make all these grandiose plans, and talk and talk and talk and then talk some more. They talked about the new arena and talked about Museum Plaza and the new bridges.
Did I say bridges as in plural? They can't get one built.
I remember on the news one night they boasted "Work was begun today on Museum Plaza," and then the next evening it was "Work was halted today on Museum Plaza." And then, one night the story was, "Work started on the new arena today," and then yes -- you guessed it -- the next night it was "Work stopped today on the arena." I forget the reason.
And now, of course, we'll be building two bridges over the river. And then there was also the idea to put a pedestrian walkway over the Big Four railroad bridge. I don't know whatever became of that.
Don't get me wrong. I love Louisville and think it's a great city and I love living in this area. I just think it's unfortunate.
From: Thad - Louisville (7/28/09)
How quickly we forget that we had a representative on the House Appropriations Committee that saw to it that funding was in the pocket for the bridge and the VA Hospital. However, because the voters decided they needed a change, they got it. And here we are doing what bureaucrats do best.
By the way, have you seen the beautiful rust forming on the Sherman Minton Bridge lately? Perhaps our local artists can do something constructive and decorative with it.
From: Holly - Louisville (7/28/09)
I find it absolutely ridiculous that Fox 41 continues to report any news regarding Karen Sypher and her allegations against Rick Pitino. I know that I am quite tired of hearing anything about what is going on with that silly woman, and I am quite sure I am not alone.
Can't Fox 41 realize that she is just desperate for attention and stop feeding into her? I don't care what Mr. Lamb does after hours or in the comfort of his own home, nor do I care what Rick Pitino is doing when he isn't coaching our Cards. It isn't my business or anyone else's.
Ms. Sypher's ultimate goal is to run Mr. Pitino out of town, and Fox 41 is giving her a venue in which to do so. If that happens, our Louisville basketball program will be hurt and so will our city. He is an outstanding coach and has done great things while here.
Please, you need to find something interesting to report and stop acting as though you are the television version of the National Enquirer.
From: Thad - Louisville (7/27/09)
Your positive support of the Courier Journal is an affront to all of those who seek honest and truthful journalism. Their heavily biased rhetoric and predictions have no place in an educational environment. Why pervert our children with lies and false innuendo?
Reading the C-J is a challenge to determine what is the truth, half-truth and everything but the truth.
(Bill Lamb responds: Thank you for your comments. Perhaps you missed it, but I have consistently been the most outspoken and frequent critic of the Courier-Journal in this city over the past few years regarding its slanted and liberal bias in covering the news. With that said, I look at these guys who run the editorial page to be temporary caretakers of something far greater than themselves. They will move on or retire soon (relatively speaking) and it is my hope the C-J will live on. I stand by my position that the community needs a strong daily newspaper.)
From: Andrew - Louisville (7/27/09)
I just wanted to let you know that I think it's awesome that you go on air and let the truth come out. You say what all of us think but we just don't say it. I have agreed with everything you have said on "Point of View."
The latest I saw was "The Police were Victims Too." I thought it was hilarious when you said "those people just have too much time on their hands."
From: G.B. - Louisville (7/24/09)
What is your opinion on the "Gas Guzzler Rebate, ?" I agree that the replacement vehicle should have a higher mpg rating than the vehicle being traded in. But I feel that people like me, who have always included the mpg rating in deciding which vehicle to purchase, are being punished. My 1998 Toyota, rated at 24 mph, is not included, even though I would like to replace it with a 2010 Toyota Prius that will get twice the miles per gallon.
From: Bill - Shelbyville, Kentucky (7/23/09)
I am adamantly opposed to the President's efforts to socialize our insurance, banking, automobile and health industries. This country has excelled on the basis of the previous individuals who have chosen to take a chance on the path of American business. Those individuals appear to be targeted by the current President. I hope his efforts to socialize American business will fail soon and he will be retired in disgrace.
From: Gerri - Louisville (7/24/09)
I would like to start out by saying that I feel for the family of Tommy Casey. But being the wife and stepmother of officers, I think you should put yourselves in the officers' shoes. They deal day in and day out with all types of people. Some mean no harm, s, ome are harmful. Some like police, some hate police. How are they to know what each individual is thinking or what their intent is?
If Mr. Casey was harmless, then why did his family call for assistance? Why did they allow a gun to be in the house if they knew he was mentally unstable (loaded or unloaded)? The police don't know it's not loaded, and just because you were telling the police that it wasn't, should they assume that no one on earth tells untruths?
No one with any integrity, including police officers, likes to see anyone get harmed. I always have told my husband, NEVER think twice. I want him to come home to me, not go to the morgue. And that means that if he is threatened, he should by all means do what he has to.
From: Derrick - Louisville (7/23/09)
I am Tommy Casey Jr.'s oldest nephew. I was in the house the night he was killed. I have kept quiet about what happened due to the trauma of seeing my uncle gunned down by several LMPD officers. I was in the front doorway when they opened fire on my uncle. My 19 year-old cousin was with me. We were telling the officers the gun was not loaded. They knew we were in the doorway but opened fire anyway. I had to grab my cousin and throw him to the ground and jump on top of him to avoid being shot as well.
I am not saying what my uncle did was right. However, the response by the LMPD officers was, in my opinion, overkill. Bill Lamb's Point of View response was crude and has hurt my family in this time of loss. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but this community is full of negativity.
We have lost a member or our family, and to have someone from your station say we have "too much free time" on our hands was very wrong. A mother and father and an entire family are in mourning for our loved one, and to have to hear remarks about the situation is wrong.
From: Kevin - Taylorsville, Kentucky (7/22/09)
If Obama really wants to fix health care, all he has to do is stop the hospitals from charging $35 for an aspirin, $14 for a plastic bed pan, and so on. The insurance companies pay this, and they wonder why insurance is so high. It is all a matter of control.
From: Janee - Louisville (7/22/09)
I would like to know why these people can run around our city - especially in the grocery stores - wearing their pants down around their thighs. Is this not considered indecent exposure? I certainly don't want to have to go out to eat, drive down the street or shop, and have to look at these guys' underwear!
Why can't the police cite them for indecent exposure? They certainly would if women walked around with their blouses unbuttoned!
From: Elaine - Louisville (7/21/09)
I think digital TV really sucks. There are a lot of people who can't afford a new TV or the converter box or antennas. They would have to choose between buying food and electricity or buying a new TV, converter box or antenna.
They should have left things the way they were. Now, a lot of people can't watch TV so they do things like commit crimes in order to get money so they can afford to.
From: Sherrill - West Point, Kentucky (7/20/09)
Finally, the reign of terror from Lord Jerry is over for the people of Metro Louisville. The sad part is, he wants to mess with the state to see how he can take from the whole of Kentucky.
Thank God the people of Kentucky have more sense than the fools in Jefferson County, as proved in the national election. We don't need any more "Pigs" (Animal Farm) in control of our government. Lord Jerry is the biggest "Pig" in Kentucky.
From: Sharon and Jay - Simpsonville, Kentucky (7/16/09)
Please address in POINT OF VIEW the problem with all the stimulus money for purchasing a new car. Does Kentucky House Bill 3 state that the car has to be built in America?
Have you noticed all the cars built outside the United States on the streets? How is the economy being helped when there is no mandate to purchase American-made cars in order to get the tax breaks, as opposed to giving workers in other countries a job at a much lower wage?
If a new car is manufactured in the United States, then I agree with the tax break on its purchase. But does the new Chevy plant in Brazil help our economy, since our government is running Chevy now?
From: Michelle - Louisville (7/16/09)
In pushing for city-county merger, Mayor Abramson displayed his true colors with regard to his disdain for former county residents and his priority he gives to the downtown area.
I do not believe the mayor is a racist, but he has given, and always will give, priority to city residents.
From: Lori - Louisville (7/15/09)
I feel the police did nothing wrong in the death of the Shively man. If the gun wasn't loaded, why did the family call the police? I'm sorry for their loss, but the blood is on their hands and not the police. They are here to protect us and they can't second guess someone with a gun.
From: Joel - Louisville (7/15/09)
My wife and I cannot believe the recent actions of the Louisville Metro Police Department in the Tommy Casey shooting. While I agree every person, , including members of the LMPD, have a right to protect their own life, killing this man was an unacceptable action. With the training and equipment at their disposal, someone could have disabled Mr. Chester with a non-lethal shot to the leg, shoulder, or a number of other areas that are not life-threatening.
It seems law enforcement has run amok and out of control -- just like the recent shooting of the Indiana man. Something needs to be done. These out of control officers need to be fired.
As a community, we are tired of the LMPD and other law enforcement agencies thinking they are untouchable. Just like in their recent battle with the city over take-home cars.
Are we becoming a Police State? What's next? Communism?
From: Jamie - Louisville (7/14/09)
I understand that the Louisville Metro Police may have felt somewhat threatened by the Shively man waving an unloaded gun, but is that not the reason taxpayers provide them with bullet-proof vests and such? Did the LMPD feel so threatened they had to shoot the man so many times? If so, why didn't the Shively officers fire on the poor guy?
All of the news stations want to talk about Michael Jackson's children, but what about this man's son? LMPD acted very unprofessionally, in my opinion.
From: Raymond - Louisville (7/13/09)
Congressman John Yarmuth is to be congratulated for having guts enough to walk out of Congress over Michael Jackson's moment of silence.
From: Wendy - Louisville (7/6/09)
I think both Anthem and Norton should grow up. We all have our problems. I am not able to see my doctor of 20 years anymore because of this mess. My employer does not offer insurance to me, so I have to pay nearly $400 a month to Anthem. I cannot afford to switch. Now, I am trying to find a suitable doctor to see me -- not to mention trying to get my records to another office.
What a mess this has caused a lot of people.
From: Charles - Louisville (7/5/09)
Why is it that some people can spend a ton of money on illegal fireworks but don't have money to spend on the display of the American flag?
From: Nicolette - New Albany, Indiana (7/3/09)
We need anonymous speech. Thanks to an anonymous e-mail, we were alerted to a city job requirement in Bozeman, Montana that required an applicant to give up all semblance of privacy. I think that's important.
We give up so much in our need to have a job, and our society keeps chipping away at our rights. Blowing the whistle has its share of real danger.
I give a big round of applause to that anonymous e-mailer.
From: Robin - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (7/1/09)
To many baby boomers, Michael Jackson is our Elvis. Regardless of all the rumors and attempts to paint him as a monster for being different, many of us have loved his music and prayed for him for many years. He is the soundtrack of my life and many others'.
Since the only thing on news these days is bad and/or biased, please allow us to remember and to grieve, because we hear the same news day after day and most media have an agenda to push these days.
God Bless MJ. I will miss him and say a prayer of thanks that I was given this time to remember and to grieve over the fact that we have lost such a great talent.
There are no paparazzi in heaven -- just peace for a man who was truly loved by millions.
From: Andrew - Louisville (6/30/09)
I was watching Seinfeld and reading my karma book when I looked up to see Bill Lamb complaining about the media coverage of Michael Jackson.
He was a legend and a pop icon, and no matter how young or old you are, you know who he is and you know his music. It's not like he was just some Joe Shmoe we see on TV sometime. He is known worldwide, and will be remembered for the rest of time. He is my generation's Elvis.
We can take a break from the gloom and doom of the world's problems that the media loves to shove down our throats to commemorate the life and work of one of the biggest names in music, period. Who is more known worldwide than Michael Jackson?
I think it's OK to look back on his life and work. We can go back to the media convincing us the end of the world is just around the corner after we have paid our respects to a musical legend.
From: Jeffery - Louisville (6/30/09)
I have a proposal to save the City of Louisville money. One way would be to require the residents of the city to pay for their garbage removal services. Instead of free weekly service, I propose they would pay $2.50 to $5.00 a week for trash removal (or approximately $ 10.00 to $ 20.00 a month). This is considerably cheaper or in line with what suburban area residents pay independent companies to collect their trash services.
Times are changing as we know it, so it is time that the Louisville City residents step up and do their part.
From: Kenneth - Louisville (6/30/09)
I am not sure if you are trying to state a point of view that stokes the fires, but you definitely hit a nerve by clearing missing the point of all of the Michael Jackson coverage.
You tend to think that the media was not doing its job by allocating more coverage to the death of Michael than the Iranian election, the South Carolina governor, or anything th, at else is going on in the world. The point is, the fact that Michael Jackson's death overshadowed these other events lets you know how intertwined into the very fabric of American life this man was and continues to be.
I told a friend a few days ago that I would never poke fun at all the Elvis lovers again. I thought it was pretty funny how these people worship Elvis even in his death. Now I understand. Michael was the Elvis of my generation. During his lifetime, Michael Jackson touched so many people with his music. I heard from so many people that Michael Jackson was the soundtrack to their youth. I heard a lot of Michael's late ‘70s music being played by my aunts and uncles when I was not even seven years old. I still get goose bumps when I hear "Human Nature" and "I Wanna Rock With You" and especia, lly "Don't Stop ‘Til You Get Enough."
I was nine years old when the "Thriller" album was released. That Album was so groundbreaking that it is the greatest selling album of all time. It was with this album that Michael Jackson no longer just belonged to the black community but the rest of the world. Do you comprehend this? The greatest selling album of all-time -- worldwide.
Think of all the great entertainers that have come and gone. Michael was not just some entertainer. Michael was special and he so wove himself into the lives of his countless fans that we all felt this loss personally. I had dinner with a 68 year-old gentleman and he shared with me that he experienced the time when Michael was a little boy. He witnessed Michael's entire life and was especially saddened to see the man leave this world.
I know that in the big scheme of things Michael was just a man. However, his musical gift to us touched so many lives and so many people are better off because of it. I would call Michael an icon but I don't think "icon" is big enough for him. There is no word.
I re, member the Motown 25th Anniversary special when I was a young kid. My mom and dad let me stay up until 11 to watch the show. When I saw Michael perform "Billie Jean" -- my favorite Jackson song by the way-- I was mesmerized. Soon after, everyone at my elementary school starting wearing high-water pants with loafers and white socks, leather jackets with over 100 zippers, the classic MJ shades, and the Jerry Curl.
This wasn't limited to elementary schools. The high school kids also got caught up in the Michael phenomenon that would soon spread worldwide. Michael has left his imprint all over popular culture.
I just don't think you grasp ho, w important this man was to so many. The media did its job by covering what people wanted and needed to see and understand. Do you realize that news of Michael's death almost brought the Internet to a standstill, as the ether was buzzing was wireless communications? I sent and received dozens of texts.
You underestimate the Michael Jackson phenomenon, my friend. R.I.P. Michael. We will continue to mourn your loss and then get back to the other issues that plague our world. In the meantime, we will continue to celebrate you and reflect on all you have meant to your fans.
From: Kimberly - Louisville (6/30/09
You're right, but Michael Jackson isn't the only celebrity that died. What about Farrah Fawcett? No one is talking about her.
From: Janet - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (6/30/09)
Thank you for your editorial about Michael Jackson's death, and I absolutely agree. I have gotten to the point of walking away from the TV, radio and the newspaper. It has been total saturation since his death was announced. Yes, there really are other things going on in the world.
From: Raymond - Greenville, Indiana (6/30/09)
There are not words adequate to describe the intellectual level people of this country have been brain washed into. We no longer honor people of character. But granted, it is becoming rarer each month.
From: Thad - Louisville (6/30/09)
I have never watched or listened to Michael Jackson's publicity or music for more than 30 seconds at a time. I have never purchased his music or know of anyone who has. He was all media hype and a useless personality in my life. He has neither harmed me nor benefited me and I like it that way.
I'm sure he couldn't have cared less if I were alive or dead. Who's the next big media mogul to go? The entertainment powers leave much to be desired if they want my money or resources.
From: Robert - Louisville (6/30/09)
I totally agree with your editorial about the news coverage lacking because of the excess entertainment coverage of Mr. Jackson.
From: Jack - Louisville (6/26/09)
Your Point of View on Integrity was very good. Makes one wonder if a guy called "Mickey Finn" could have involved in the case of the Jeffersonville City Attorney.
From: Edith - Louisville (6/26/09)
I just read an article about the mayor wanting JCC to have the Downtown Hotel. If they wanted it badly enough, they should have been there to make their bid at the time of bidding.
Wayside got it fair and square and that should be the end of it. But now the Mayor wants to step in and use his authority to seize the building from the homeless. This makes me very sad to know that our own mayor has lost sight of a growing problem in our community and doesn't care if these people have housing or not.
We have plenty of colleges. And JCC -- when I went there for some classes -- looked as if it was a ghost town. In these economic times, fewer people are going to be looking to go to college they can't afford and looking for a place to stay because they have no job and no money for housing. I cannot believe that our community treats these people as if they have the plague while most of them simply fell on hard times and are down on their luck.
I hope the people that oppose this move for the homeless don't end up homeless themselves. I think this mayor has been mayor too long. He has lost sight of important issues for this city.
From: George - Floyds Knobs, Indiana (6/18/09)
I saw your editorial today concerning the distribution of advertising material by the Courier-Journal. We had a similar problem here just a few years ago. A publisher in our area was dropping a circular in every drive or in the yard periodically. They were making a mess in some yards and creating a definite aggravation for , those who would at least pick them up.
My first thought was to write them a letter to complain. My second thought was to take pictures around the neighborhood and mail the pictures to the advertisers. I sent the pictures, along with a letter asking the advertisers to insist that the advertising they were paying for was delivered in such a way as not to inflame customers.
I am sure that piles of the fliers indicated that the advertising was of no value. We saw no more such activity in our neighborhood. Worked like a charm.
From: Sam - New Albany, Indiana (6/22/09)
I believe the mayor of Jeffersonville was foolish to make those statements about the city attorney who was photographed in a trash can. The man is a public figure and should be held accountable for his actions. The police department was correct in releasing those pictures. The city attorney should resign his position and seek some type of help.
Someone like that should not represent the city or the public. The man is a disgrace to Jeffersonville. The governor himself should ask for this person to step down and leave office forever.
From: Veronica - Louisville (6/22/09)
In my opinion, the city official found in trash can did nothing wrong. I don't believe he or the officers involved should have to pay any price for being human. We sometimes think that elected officials are not allowed to do things that normal humans do, and that is unfair. It was, I'm sure, not something that he set out to do, and it's unfortunate that the officers took photos, but hey -- it was a funny thing to see.
City official or regular person, he should not be in fear of losing his job. I personally would not hold it against him if he were my attorney either. I think they should leave him alone and go on with more important things that are going on in their city.
From: Jay - Louisville (6/18/09)
If the Courier-Journal persists in this suit, why don't you guys suggest that everyone who receives one of these green bags of circulars take it with them on a drive downtown, and as they drive by the Courier building, just toss it out the window in front of the building as the deliverer does in our neighborhoods? After they get a few thousand a week that they have to clean up, perhaps they will understand what they are doing.
From: James - Louisville (6/18/09)
Regarding the recent train accident at the Zoo:
Why design a train system that can go fast enough to go off the track? Why give this power to a human operator?
Why not design a train system that cannot go fast enough to go off the track?
Doesn't seem that hard.
Smarter design. Let's do it. And not just here, but anywhere possible. Now is the time for American innovation.
From: Erin - Louisville (6/17/09)
It appears to me that the situation with the attorney in Indiana caught in the garbage can is another situation where money talks and ******** walks. If it was anyone else they would not have been escorted home, but arrested for alcoholic intoxication in a public place. I guess you have to have seniority and clout to get away with things.
From: Michael - Louisville (6/17/09)
In a recent editorial you once again expressed your appreciation for the work done by Mayor Abramson. It is clear to me that you do not live in South Louisville. If you did, your opinion of the Mayor's accomplishments would be very different.
We in the South End tend to see ourselves as living in the part of town the mayor forgot. At a past Mayor's Town Meeting, the he was asked about the lack of nice restaurants and shopping opportunities in the South End. His response, in part, was that we're getting a Lowe's. However, if you want to get a check advance loan or have your nails done, we've got you covered.
When asked why there is a lack of restaurants (other than fast food) his response was that we in the South End do not make enough charges on plastic to make it worthwhile for fine restaurants to come to the South End. I guess paying in cash isn't sufficient.
So until the mayor recognizes that the South End is also a vital part of Louisville, we will likely disagree with your high opinion of the mayor's accomplishments.
From: Steve - Louisville (6/11/09)
There is more than one question as to whether or not we should allow slot machines at Churchill Downs. Who will own the slot machines? Kentucky? Or some rich company that doesn't pay enough taxes already?
Call me a socialist if you want. The government needs to put its hands in these types of endeavors. Sure, put slot machines at Churchill Downs. But the slot machines should be government owned, so all proceeds go to the good of the community.
It seems many people give a disgusted look when someone mentions a "socialistic" idea. What's wrong with the government doing what it was designed to do -- work for the people? The government should own its own casinos, manufacturing, oil refineries, fuel stations, hospitals, insurance companies and much more. The profits from these government-run companies would help make up state deficits and federal deficits, and ease the wallets of hard working taxpayers that can barely afford the products necessary for life, while the people we buy them from continue to have pockets overflowing with our money.
From: LeAnna - Floyds Knobs, Indiana (6/5/09)
People that grow and sell marijuana get their personal belongings confiscated. That is a deterrent, and it is good. But what happens to people that are caught manufacturing meth? This is a more dangerous crime and affects so many more people in many ways.
I am not familiar with the consequences, but I honestly think they should be more severe than the marijuana consequences, since meth manufacturers are endangering everyone who buys the drug, uses the drug and/or lives around them, and also the children who are often exposed.
From: K.M. - LaGrange, Kentucky (6/3/09)
I am so sick of hearing people complain about foreclosed houses! If they don't like the high grass and trash, they need to get off their lazy , butts and clean it up! The city can't take care of all of them, and the people that lost their homes are not coming back to clean them.
From: Bob - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (6/2/09)
It is obvious that the state legislature cannot pass any laws that benefit the state's revenue issues, so cuts are needed. In Louisville, for example, there are nine public golf courses that don't get play since they are not kept up.
Long Run Golf Course recently received a million-dollar clubhouse and facelift. Was that needed? Long Run's property is worth several millions of dollars. Sell it and close other golf courses before closing public parks.
From: Shawn - Louisville (6/2/09)
Everyone wants to talk about the revenue we lose by not having slots and the impact this has. I seem to recall when Churchill Downs was against slots altogether. They lobbied to keep the slots out of the state, and now all they have done is send that money to Indiana and we are missing out on the revenue that would be gained by it.
I am not totally against slot machines in the state, but I am totally against it just for Churchill Downs. If it is to be allowed, it should be allowed for any Kentucky business, that is willing to operate under local gaming guidelines.
Churchill Downs should not be handed the golden spoon and catered to anymore. Either they change their ways and manage better or close the doors. I am totally against any special treatment for them. They made there bed -- now they should lie in it.
From: Anna - Louisville (5/28/09)
I just don't think it's right that doctors take an oath and then deny care to patients in need because they can not afford insurance. My husband is 30 years old and was just diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. We have five children and can not afford health insurance because he can no longer work. We cannot find him a neurologist because of lack of insurance, and because we have a six-year-old, three four-year-olds and a two-year-old, we cannot afford to pay the bill upfront.
Pleas let the people know this is wrong.
From: Jerry - Louisville (5/28/09)
You keep touting thoroughbred racing's need for legalized gambling to survive. When the issue first came up they fought harder then anyone to stop it. They didn't want gaming in Kentrucky to take away from their revenue. Now they want a monopoly on it. Get real.
When talking news without looking at history you seem to have a very narrow view.
From: Jessica - Louisville (5/28/09)
I am absolutely appalled by the recent decision by Governor Beshear to overturn the Kentucky State Police's decision to discontinue offering the driver's license test in multiple languages. Offering the test in multiple languages -- 22 to be exact -- is a courtesy, not a right.
The news is filled with all of the state's budgetary concerns including, but not limited to, hiring freezes and mandatory furlough days. I would like to point out that I am not a government employee, nor is anyone in my immediate family. I am, however, an affected, concerned citizen of the state of Kentucky. Every dollar saved means that we are that much closer to putting more cops on the roads, and firefighters on duty.
As a mother, I am far more concerned about the safety of my community than the convenience of "business executives, students and legal workers" who are looking to get a Kentucky drivers license. If they are not fluent in the English language, they cannot pass the test, and therefore offering the test in other languages is a moot point -- so why don't we save the money?
If our state had money to burn, I'd say do everything we can to make everyone as comfortable as possible; the fact of the matter is that we do not. In addition to relying on federal stimulus money, every agency statewide is being asked to tighten its belt, and when one does, it is met with opposition.
From: Kenneth - Louisville (5/28/09)
"Horseracing Capital of the World" is what Kentucky has been called forever. But is it really? I think not. And the reason it isn't anymore is because apparently no one in Frankfort is able to realize that this is 2009 -- not 1969.
Churchill Downs has a deep and rich tradition of hosting some of the finest spring and fall meets in the world, let alone the Kentucky Derby itself. But if the powers that be in Frankfort and across this state do not wake up and smell the coffee, it may soon be nonexistent. And that is because no one here is willing to change.
When smaller tracks like Indiana Downs are drawing larger crowds and have bigger purses than the tracks here in Kentucky, it's safe to say we have a problem. Allowing the slots at these tracks would not only benefit the tracks themselves and horseracing in general, but would create new revenue for the state -- which we need desperately -- and would create new jobs.
Now, would that be a bad thing? I think not. Instead of allowing the people of this state to donate millions of dollars in revenue a year to Indiana and elsewhere, why not let it stay here? If you had told me five years ago that Churchill Downs would only run four days a week during their spring meet, I would have s, aid you were crazy. But it has happened, and the people of this state have no one to blame but themselves.
I say allow the slots at the tracks. It's a win-win situation for everyone. Please -- someone in Frankfort, wake up! Governor Beshear can't do it without you.
From: Ed - Louisville (5/23/09)
Great piece on independence trumping party loyalty. While I am no fan of -- , nor am I against -- Specter's recent change of party, the title says it all. And his message, whether he even believes it or not, is very true.
This is one reason I entered the political arena and ran for Mayor in 2006. Someone has to stand up for "We, the People" first. Neither party was ever intended to be an organization in which people act like two-year-olds and withhold voting or discussion because of party loyalty. If someone wants to "take their ball and go home," by all means -- let us help them out the door.
This is the biggest reason we are going backward in so many ways. It has become a power play for the representatives and not those of us they represent.
Hopefully, we can right this ship called America -- even if only here in our Louisville. It has to start somewhere.
From: John - Louisville (5/22/09)
Bill Lamb's editorial about journalism deserving better would have been a little more, credible if his own station didn't try to pass off stupid "American Idol" stories as news night after night after night. And you're trying to make last year's Louisville tryou, ts still seem relevant! (Guess what? They're not.)
Everyone knows "Idol" is about worthless. The "winners" rarely become stars, and the lower ratings would indicate that the rest of the world has figured this out as well.
From: Joyce - Louisville (5/22/09)
Why can't Kentucky get gambling? Indiana is getting all of our money. Why not let Churchill Downs get slot machines? Maybe then our taxes would go down.
Wake up Kentucky -- this happened when stores had to close on Sundays and everyone spent money in Indiana. Finally, Kentucky woke up and let stores open on Sunday.
Now, it's time to wake up and get help from casino money. People are going to gamble one way or the other. Why can't Kentucky keep the money here at home?
From: Pat - Fairdale (5/21/09)
You hit the hot button with me tonight. I am a loyal news watcher. However, by the time I watch sports, the weather and the health segments -- as well as the latest You Tube video showing either cute puppies being saved or crazy behavior by someone -- there is little news to actually watch.
News is NOT what it used to be on our major television stations.
From: D.P. - Louisville (5/20/09)
After a year of letters/e-mails/phone calls to the Courier-Journal and the mayor's office, Channel 41 has responded to the call! If anyone else threw unwanted trash on my lawn it would qualify as litter, but because it's the Courier-Journal, it's "advertising?"
While Mr. Lamb has made public our frustration, let's hope the Courier will change their policy of tossing their papers on city lawns. Whatever happened to "Clean up Louisville?"
From: Alice - Louisville (5/20/09)
It is my personal opinion that all of the Courier-Journal is junk. But leaving the unwanted ads in driveways across the county - even at abandoned homes - is littering. It is not freedom of the press. It's a quick way to make a buck!
Maybe if the C-J published some actual information that's not biased and inflammatory, more people would subscribe.
From: Steve - Louisville (5/18/09)
Why is Fox 41 the only local station pressing the zoning issues surrounding the Javanon indoor facility? This facility has been built to benefit the children who play soccer in the Louisville community. In every segment that you have devoted to this issue, you have failed to depict Javanon in a true light.
The facility is not an eyesore. In fact, it is a more attractive building than the church that sits in the lot next door. You have only interviewed people that live in the vicinity of the building. You have not spoken to any of the families that are afforded the use of the facility. It seems odd that your station twists the facts, and does not get the entire story, in front of the public.
I have long been a supporter of Fox stations, local and national, but this type of reporting has made me change my opinions of the stations. Fox has always been a source of good and fair reporting, one without an agenda. It is quite clear that the station has an agenda, considering this situation. It saddens me to realize the avenues that this station is willing to take to manipulate this situation.
From: Mike - Louisville (5/15/09)
All elected officials have always voted their party, good or bad. Now they vote party, their religion, race and sexual lifestyles. It's never what the people want.
From: Gregg - Louisville (5/14/09)
This week, another local station showed video of drug dealers openly selling drugs in a west end neighborhood. It looked like footage you would expect to see in a gang-run New York neighborhood.
Police cars are getting shot at here. There needs to be a crime crackdown to bring these dealers to justice. Maybe with a large media campaign, people in Louisville can be told to get control of their streets and lower the general crime rate. They are going to have to do their part and convict arrested dealers in a court of law. But maybe the towel has already been thrown in by the police.
If dealers don&, #39;t get sent to jail, why should officers bother putting their lives on the line, only to have a jury send the criminals back to the streets for another round?
From: Donna - Louisville (5/2/09)
I just witnessed my third "VIP" motorcade for what I assume is the Derby. At 12:45 pm, two unmarked cars leading and following with three black SUVs in the middle near, ly ran people off River Road. Drivers assumed an emergency vehicle needed access, only to find it was some big shot needing to get to the Derby. They turned their lights and sirens off as soon as they hit Mockingbird Valley Road.
Yesterday at 1:00 I was driving I-71 and the same thing occurred, this time with two unmarked cars and nine white vans in the center. They were flying down the highway at 80 mph making people yield to them, thinking it was an emergency and then finding out someone was just in a hurry to get to the Downs. And again when I turned down River Road from Zorn, I had to get over because another escort was coming up River Road.
I understand that the Derby brings in tons of money for our economy and that it brings people from across the world to the city, but these escorts ar, e only appropriate for the President of the U.S. and maybe the governor. Are the tax dollars that I work very hard to pay making these escorts possible? Can I request an escort to the Derby? What are the prerequisites for receiving one? Do you have to be worth a lot of money? Have a reality TV show? Are limo, usines not the "in" thing to do?
I have to think that if in 12 hours I ran into three, I was not just lucky enough to happen t, o be where the only three were. How many escorts are required?
From: John - Louisville (4/30/09)
Why is everyone so worked up over the Swine Flu? Is it because it is new? There are more deaths weekly from regular flu than reported cases of the swine flu thus far.
Is the media hyping this up simply for ratings? I mean, one death in the U.S. - which happened to be a Mexican citizen traveling to the U.S. - is hardly cause for a level five alert.
I would like to hear/see a report on 'standard' strain influenza deaths. It seems that all major media outlets jump on the bandwagon and report on what seems to be "imminent danger" when, in fact, the same precautions that America has been scared into in order to help prevent the spread of swine flu would actually help reduce the spread of 'standard' flu and probably save more lives.
I do understand that this is a new strain and that, in general, we are taught to fear the unknown. I acknowledge that there is some potential for this to reach a high mortality rate. However, is it likely to cause more than the current 36,000 U.S. deaths that already occur?
In closing, I would just like to say that in these situations I believe reporting this information is important. However, 109 out 300 million people is .000003633 percent. Surely not reason enough to claim the sky is falling.
From Stephanie - Mount Washington, Kentucky (4/30/09)
In the case of the controversy surrounding the Miss USA competition, I think it is ridiculous that Perez Hilton would take it that far. Everybody has their own opinions when it comes to gay marriage, and Miss California answered the question in the most respectful way she could have. Just because he didn't like the answer, he should have never judged her that way. Not everybody in this world agrees with same sex marriage, including me. He is, just being a big childish baby.
From: Pamela - Louisville (4/30/09)
I think maybe we would all not pass around illnesses if the Jefferson County Public Schools would let ou, r children wash their hands at school. They are only allowed to use hand sanitizer, even before lunch. After they use the restroom they cannot was their hands.
I have two children in elementary school, and they both have asked to wash their hands many times for years but are told "no" because they had to use hand sanitizer.
I have spoken to many of my friends and teachers in other schools and they say the same thing -- they all use hand sanitizer only. Seriously -- hand sanitizer does not remove dirt, urine, sand and so on. So why does the schools think this is okay?
From: Lori - Louisville (4/29/09)
You put into well-thought words just what I was thinking. Perez Hilton is entitled to his thoughts, but when his thoughts are not shared, watch out. He did a great job of showing exactly what intolerance is all about -- "My way, or the highway."
Miss California is a winner in my book!
From: Jason - Jeffersonville, Indiana (4/26/09)
We were wondering what your take is on city police being used to block local traffic for in/out traffic of "mega" churches that have sprouted in the area.
One such church was just built near our home, and I was pondering the idea as we sat for 30 minutes waiting for all the churchgoers to leave while four Jeffersonville police officers blocked all traffic.
I personally think this is a huge insult, feeling that I'm not as important as a member of a multimillion dollar "Six Flags over Jesus." Not to mention the clear mockery of separation of church and state.
<, STRONG>From: Bill - Louisville (4/23/09)
Regarding your decision not to air Karen Sypher's unsubstantiated (as yet) allegations:
I commend you for having, and sticking to, ethical values. It appears to be an increasingly uncommon characteristic for any part of the community. Too many organizations and individuals appear to be much too anxious to get attention by using rumor and innuendo.
From: David - Fairdale, Kentucky (4/22/09)
Although Mr. Lamb's comments regarding the city's debris collection activities were admirable, he was wrong to label the individuals who had taken the Mayor of Louisville at his word as "whiners." In any situation where someone announces his/her intentions of doing something, then most individuals are inclined to believe them and at least ask "why?" when it is not done. It does not make them whiners because they expect the mayor to live up to what he says he is going to do. It makes them constituents with cause.
If you are going to stand on local television and say "Have your debris on the curb by February 9th in order to have it picked up," then don't whine when the masses complain that you are not doing your job.
Seems like the "Mayor for Life" needs to think before he commits.
From: Kevin - Louisville (4/22/09)
I take a bit of exception to your comments on the City debris pick up.
You said it was not the city's duty to pick up the debris. You are somewhat correct but the mayor made it the city's duty when he announced there would be debris pick ups. The city is running on our tax dollars. Th, at's from money you (if you live or work in this city) and I worked hard for and pay city taxes on. I most certainly will get better use of that money by having my debris picked up than by having a 450 million dollar arena built that I will never use.
In addition, the city is getting FEMA funds to aid in this pick up.
I'm a handicapped person who would have done what was needed to rid my curb of debris, but I was promised by my mayor that debris would be picked up by the city, using my tax dollars and FEMA funding. I'm just waiting to see when the city will fulfill the mayor's commitment.
From: Bret - Louisville (4/22/09)
I had prof, essionals cut down my broken limbs and branches. They were going to haul the debris away for a small fee, taking advantage of free drop-off points, until they found out that they were issuing citations for such drop-offs by professionals. In the meantime, our mayor said he would have the debris picked up by Derby Day.
Instead of paying the additional $100 to haul it away, I went with the mayor's plan. It seems to me that if the mayor would have allowed free drop-off for all the tree cutting services, they would have been able to take care of a large portion of the debris, leaving much less for the City.
With a 20 million-dollar budget deficit, I would think this would have been a better way to handle the matter. It would have involved no overtime for the city workers and spread the wealth through all the small- to medium-sized businesses that were already on the property, and our city would be clean and ready for Derby.
From: Chris - Louisville (4/22/09)
I usually agree with your comments and enjoy listening to you and the viewers' feedback. But your Point of View on the debris clean-up sent me through the roof! After the storm, we tried to no avail to have the drop off point at Highview Park reopened so we could clean up our own yards, but the city kept telling us to use the three that were available -- that another one would not be open and that we should just wait for the pick up if that wasn't convenient.
Do you know how dangerous it would be to drag storm debris on a trailer all the way to Meriwether Street? We would have had to make at least 10 trips. Our storm debris pile is 25 feet long and at least six feet high.
We just found out the city is not coming down our street because it is considered priv, ate, even though we have 10 houses on the street and the city services it. So we have to move our storm debris anyway, the city and the mayor have lied again.
From: Paula - Louisville (4/22/09)
I am sure everyone that has a mess to clean up after the ice storm is thankful for the mayor's decision that the city would clean up. And yes, everyone should be a little more patient, considering how extensive the damage was.
But a lot of people do not have the means, or the money, to have the mess hauled off. Otherwise, I am sure they would have done it themselves.
From: Debbie - Mount Washingto, n, Kentucky (4/22/09)
Thank You! There are many people out of work, sitting around wondering "What do I do next?"
Get out and HELP!
That's part of the problem today -- we want the government to do more and more for us, then we sit back and complain because we are taxed. Where do we think the money is coming from to pay for all this?
From: Anita - Louisville (4/22/09)
I think Mr. Lamb is part, ially correct in that people do want everything but many do not want to pay for it. However, on this particular issue I strongly disagree with everyone "cleaning up their own mess."
What about seniors or those who are physically unable to do such work? Besides being physically unable, many are financially unable to hire others to do the cleanup.
Seniors pay taxes too, and they pay for many services that they no longer need or use. If the debris is at the curb, there is no reason the city should not pick it up.
And why are they not recycling this debris? They have large industrial wood chippers and they could shred all of the wood and resell it as mulch. That might help defray some of the cost.
Besides, don't forget that the city, along with the state, got federal funds to help pay for the massive cleanup.
I believe this particular issue does not belong in the category of "people wanting something for nothing." I'm sure if Fox 41, or Mr. Lamb, can come up with a plan for those who are physically or financially unable to clean up their own mess -- other than relying upon city services -- they would be glad to hear it.
From: Robert - Orleans, Indiana (4/21/09)
I agree that people in this country have become soft, even to the point of being lazy. They expect the government or other people to do their work for them and don't take responsibility for themselves to get things done.
Good work ethics are disappearing in this country.
From: Brian - Southern Indiana (4/21/09)
People really do want ev, erything done for them these days, and its time they stopped complaining and just got something done themselves. I never thought of it from the perspective that the city wasn't responsible, but I've always thought residential home owners should take care of their debris on their own. I live up in Indiana and we didn't expect anyone to come and pick up our debris for us.
From: Jesse - Louisville (4/20/09)
Thunder over Louisville traffic was nothing shy of a monstrous disaster. We parked at 3rd and Main and , when we left, we sat in traffic along with many others at 3rd and Muhammad Ali Blvd. at a dead stop for 45 minutes -- no one moved.
They tried to direct every single car to I-65 instead of using the traffic lights to let people who wanted to use the surface streets to do so. We expected some traffic problems but not "sit still traffic."
When we finally approached Broadway, one officer told us to go into the second lane from the right, and also told the lane next to us to go at the same time. When we got on Broadway there was another traffic guard telling us to get back over to the right lane -- so we had one lane lined up behind the other, and then 10-12 cars driving at an angle trying to get back to the lane they were just told to get out of.
What they should do it block off three to four streets for people walking and then let the traffic lights guide the rest of the people home. I don't know why putting 300,000+ cars on I-65 sounds like a great idea. It's not like this is the first time Louisville has had major traffic for Thunder -- you'd think they'd have a standardized plan by now.
We also saw an ambulance go west down Muhammad Ali, and within three minutes they came east back down the same street. And after about another few minutes, here they came again going west. I hope whoever was waiting for the ambulance is okay.
This is another reason they should have let the lights do the guiding. On the bright side, we couldn't have had more perfect seats for the entire show. But if we improved the traffic flow, we would probably attract a lot more people, not to mention make more money for the Derby Festival.
From: Charles - Brandenburg, Kentucky (4/20/09)
For the past many years I have viewed Thunder over Louisville from the Kennedy Bridge (on the Indiana side). The past two years I've noticed that many of the other people there appeared to be Indiana State Police and their family members.
This year, they closed the bridge off to all except those family members and guests with passes.
What gives here?
From: Krystyn - Louisville (4/6/09)
I'm concerned that soon Churchill Downs is going to be a thing of the past. With all the budget shortfalls experienced by the city recently, lawmakers should be all over trying to gain the extra revenue that could be generated for the state by adding slots and video poker at the track. Instead, we're allowing that revenue to go to other places such as Indiana. The lawmakers need to wake up, and realize that our local economy needs this extra money and , that slot machines could make a world of difference.
From: Josh - Crestwood, Kentucky (4/3/09)
I wish my fellow U of L Cards fans would get some class! Coach Kragthorpe is trying to clean up our football program and build us back into a winner0. He is out there getting high quality people who are athletes!
Also, booing at home games when there are potential future players/stars in attendance is not going to help our recruiting efforts. Maybe a little support for our guys would be a good thing -- that might even show recruit prospects that Louisville is the place for them because our fans are loyal and can show some class.
Grow up fans -- quit crying and CHEER!
&nbs, p;
From: Tom - Sellersburg, Indiana (4/2/09)
This is just like the narrow-minded leaders that have been in office too long. First, they run tobacco out of the state. Liquor will be next. Then horse racing. Give them a few years and UPS and Ford will also have to go.
From: Joe - Taylorsville, Kentucky (4/1/09)
I saw where Shelbyville is helping Latinos with an education, jobs, and food. What about our own people who are hungry, unemployed and uneducated? I have been unemployed every since this economy has been on a "downfall." I think we should worry about our own people instead of helping illegal immigrants.
Where are my food, job, and education?
From: William - LaGrange, Kentucky (4/1/09)
How does Congress have the audacity to condemn AIG CEOs about bonuses and failures? This is not new. Congress was aware of this long ago but paid little attention. Large payouts are typical for businesses. These people (CEOs) created this mess and want to get paid for doing so.
Congress has been spending our tax dollars like they belong to them for years. Billions and billions of taxpayer dollars have been squandered, yet they give themselves raises and perks. They have a retirement pension next to none. When one passes away his retirement money still goes on to his wife, who also receives a large amount on top of her husband's retirement. I think even when she passes away their children receive it all. When a taxpayer dies it stops...period. Congressmen receive trips, gifts, anything the lobbyist can give.
Yes it's wrong for the CEOs to take these bonuses when jobs and homes are being lost. I'll bet the children and grandchildren of the politicians in Washington and the CEOs who are old enough are not in the military to fight the wars overseas. Maybe they are too precious to join.
From: Rob - Louisville (4/1/09)
Our Mayor for Life may have finally found his ticket out of office with the Cordish boondoggle. We're expected to believe that somehow Cordish needs a million dollars to renovate an almost brand new property to turn it into yet another sports bar? There is no way that the city will see any return on this investment.
How many new businesses or struggling existing local businesses could have been helped with this ridiculous blank check to the Cordish company? It's time to kick Jerry out of office.
From: Janice - New Albany, Indiana (4/1/09)
I'm finding it hard to believe that you are not all over UK's latest coach purchase. The whole scenario is just ridiculous. UK is hell bent on winning and if they are not in the Final Four (God help us all) they will go to any extreme to be there. The new coach better watch his back! If his players do not win he will be booted!
What happened to education? I am sure all that money could be spent a lot more wisely in other areas of the educational field. UK fans need a realty check. There are people living in the state of Kentucky that would sure appreciate a dollar or two of that money to help them survive another day. It shows us all what is more important to the fine upstanding folks of Kentucky.
From: Kris - Louisville (3/31/09)
Why should I be surprised when I opened the Courier Journal this morning to see a huge picture of John Calipari on the front page - identifying him as UK's "likely" next basketball coach -- while our U of L women's basketball Team was relegated to a small banner at the top with two miniscule pictures of their victory over Maryland and their upcoming trip to the Final Four? Since when does a "maybe" supersede a "definite" on the front page? Why is a coach that isn't even here in our state taking precedence over our terrific hometown women's basketball team? Go figure!
From: Paddy - Louisville (3/31/09)
It never ceases to amaze me how the news media and the public brush off the accomplishments of the U of L women's basketball team and women's sports in general. Last night on the News at 10 and again this morning, the top stories are about UK's new men's basketball coach. For almost five minutes we hear about how he'll be making 35 million dollars and all the hoopla revolving around UK. And then for less than two minutes it's the women's turn.
Maybe on some other day UK can be the top story, but not this time. Not when the Lady Cards have worked hard all year to show this city that they deserve just as much respect as the men, and h, a, ve done something that no other U of L women's basketball team has done in this town.
I am tired of hearing about UK's basketball woes -- especially since we have a great team in our own city that has been virtually ignored all season while playing their hearts out for their school, their coach and their fans. Maybe for once we should focus on the kids who go out and do their best instead of fans and coaches with inflated egos who only care about money.
And one last thought - how dare this man take, and UK offer, this kind of money when kids can't afford to go to college and parents are struggling to pay for tuition and student loans. It's a disgrace and goes to show how completely out of whack our priorities are in this state and country.
Thanks to Jeff Walz and the U of team. Go LADY Cards!
From: Anita - Leavenworth, Indiana (3/31/09)
I understand that college athletics are very important to schools, but I find it very disturbing that in today's economy -- with schools announcing cuts in funding and it being harder to receive financial aid -- that these same schools announce 35 million dollar contracts for a coach. Don't get me wrong -- the students that earn a scholarship need a good coach because they are expected to bring winning attention to the school. However, there are many more students struggling to even get the opportunity to further their education.
What, exactly, are we setting ourselves up for by having less money to send more of our youth to school to ensure an educated and prosperous future to move this country out of a recession instead of more minimum wage workers? I also realize the revenue that these games bring into the state&#, 39;s economy but again, the majority of the students are going to suffer due to the lack of funds available to help them get an education.
From: Lynn - LaGrange, Kentucky (3/30/09)
I think the U of L men's basketball team and coaches deserves praise and thanks from the community for a wonderful season. I was disappointed for them that the season ended, but I feel they did a wonderful job representing our city and state. They should lead our city in the Derby Festival Parade.
From: Carl - Taylorsville, Kentucky (3/26/09)
I was born in Louisville in 1941, moved away for 18 years, and now I'm back. Politics here have always been this way. While the state motto is "United we Stand, Divided we Fall," the truth is we have always been divided. The politicians can't get along, the counties can't get along, the people vote in the worst candidates they can find and there are power struggles between the Governor and both houses o, f the legislature. That is why the Commonwealth is so backward and at the bottom of the list in everything -- except taxes, where we rank in the top 10%.
From: Mari - New Albany, Indiana (3/25/09)
Why is everybody so worried about ric, h people having to take a bus to the Oaks? How about we start worrying about what's important -- like the total lack of healthcare for the poor? I just spent eight hours a day for three solid days trying to get a doctor that would accept Medicaid.
There's no help for the poor, and there's going to be so many more poor people needing help now. Why can't we worry about that and do something instead of worrying about a stupid horse race?
From: Rob - Louisville (3/24/09)
The problem with AIG is not that they paid the bonuses. It's that the Treasury Department either didn't make giving up the incentive comp payments a condition for the bailout. The other option was to allow AIG to go into Chapter 11 bankruptcy (reorga, nization), which would have required all contracts to be void and renegotiated.
Barring this, I don't think management had any option legally but to pay the bonuses with our tax dollars.
From: Jeri - Louisville (3/23/09)
I would like to see a story done looking into how inmates just walk out of Metro Corrections. The public should be notified as soon as an inmate is missing. What is it going to take before the public sees this as a serious issue?
Imagine a murderer being released only to commit more murders. The public should have a right to know when an inmate escapes and if an 18-year-old can escape, anyone can.
The police department would never have admitted or announced that an inmate was improperly released had the attempt to capture him not gone so badly. Imagine a domestic violence victim having safely put her abuser away in jail, only to be awakened by him after he walks out of jail.
Until Metro Corrections is held accountable and there is a public notification of inmate escapes, no one should ever feel safe in this city.
&, nbsp;
From: Mariah - LaGrange, Kentucky (3/18/09)
Speaking as a resident of a rural county, the weather causing the school year to run into June is nothing new to me. It's not unusual to start the year before Jefferson County and get out after them.
I have no doubt, had Jefferson County not been affected, there would be no legislation for waivers. We don't enjoy it either, but you need to quit whining, live like the rest of us and send your kids to school!
From: Martin - Vine Grove, Kentucky (3/16/09)
With the current state of the economy, can the members of Congress justify the automatic pay raise they recently gave themselves? Since it has long been said that they need the money for maintaining two places of residence -- both in their home state and D.C. -- why not billet them in government family housing in Virginia and Maryland and give them meal cards to eat in the dinning facilities? This alone should save the taxpayers hundreds of millions a year
From: Kevin - Louisville (3/13/09)
Chris Thieneman has said it all. We, the people of the city, want to see the books -- not what the mayor wants to show us. What is he hiding?
$97 million is a lot of rainy day funds not being used to help the city. But it's OK -- we trust the mayor!
From: Holly - Shelbyville, Kentucky (3/12/09)
I think one way to save money for Kentucky is: Instead of hiring people and paying them to clean up the sides of our highways and roadways, we need to use what we have right in front of our noses -- prisoners. They used them a long time ago, so why not use them to pick up trash again?
They can be the ones that are not harsh criminals. They can check their backgrounds and have guards out there. It just seems , that it makes sense because we are paying prisoners to work every day while they are in prison. Then we are paying people to clean our highways too. Well, that is just wasting the taxpayers' money.
They already have it way too easy while they are in prison. They get three warm meals, a warm place to sleep, a TV to watch, a shower, and they get paid to work. They did something wrong, and that is why they are behind bars. It is supposed to be like a prison -- not like a hotel.
From: Cynthia - New Salisbury, Indiana (3/11/09)
I disagree with what you said about high school dropouts because:
1. Children should not be allowed at the age of sixteen to make a choice that will affect them for their entire adult life.
2. Children should not be viewed as hopeless or dead weight. Everyone has potential. Some need encouragement and hope from an outside source if they are not getting that at home.
3. If you allow children to quit their education what kind of future will they have? You said that it would be cost effective to get rid of them no, w rather than later. Well, if they do not receive an education, what will be in their future? Jail or welfare. How cost effective is that?
From: Lee - Louisville (3/11/09)
I agree with getting rid of the dead weight in the Jefferson County Public Schools. Which means a few teachers need to be gotten rid of.
And what about the special needs student, s who continually get passed through grade after grade and are in high school but only read on a fifth or sixth grade level? Are they considered dead weight also?
<, P>
From: Scott - Louisville (3/11/09)
I find your opinions about children's education outrageous. No child is a lost cause. The lack of interest of students can be attributed to a multitude of issues, and if a student's focus is not point on, I put the main blame on the teachers and the education system.
The bottom line is, these students should be valued as much as any other student and not viewed as dead weight. I believe you should find better topics or something beneficial our community can reflect on.
The education system should find a better way to help these students become interested in learning and use a multitude of motivational techniques to lead these children in understanding how important a good education is. You al, so should take into consideration the environment and resources these children have. Not everyone in our community stands on an equal plain.
The children are our future leaders and the building blocks of our ever-growing foundation. We are only as strong as our weakest link, and we cannot afford to give up on any child.
From: Raymond - Southern Indiana (3/9/09)
In the ‘40s I played football and went through four years of hell. There was no water from start to finish and we jogged two miles to and from the field. I made v, arsity my senior year, all 150 pounds of me.
If this hell is to persist, only brutes should be allowed to go out for football. Peer pressure kept us on the field.
From, : Kyle - Vine Grove, Kentucky (3/5/09)
Speaking of circulating the cash -- how is the government circulating our cash? With all of the money they're giving these car companies just so they can say "We need more."
Everyone needs more money. We're in a recession. If they're not selling the cars, they should stop making them. What are they going to do with the old ones? They're going to ask the government for more money so they can afford to sell the cars cheaper and still make a profit.
I see right through their little game. I've also taken it upon myself to do the math. 30 billion dollars divided among the United States' approximate population of 305 million is almost 100 dollars a person. When you subtract the minors and people who don't pay taxes, it's even more.
100 dollars out of everyone's pocket is a lot of money. Why not do something nice, like build some playgrounds or do something that needs to be done? Think about the necessities. Send everyone a hundred dollar check -- anything -- I don't care.
I just don't see why they are willing to throw all this valuable money away.
From: Paul - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (2/26/09)
Since our governor and most state 'leaders' seem to be all too happy to go to the Federal gov, ernment for money and guidance whenever they need something, why do we bother having them? Why pay for them? Why -- when the federals tell us how we have to spend the money and how we have to live our lives?
Where is the pride of state or commonwealth autonomy? The country was formed by a union of states, joining to form the Federal confederation. The Federal government was to serve the states in national security, treaties, and international/interstate trade. Why have our states let go of their control and yielded our individual unique qualities to the Federal government, which seeks to suck our beliefs, monies, and freedoms from our lives?
Kentucky must reclaim its place among the 50 others, lest we become no more than the flyover area between New York and California.
From: Kim - Eastview, Kentucky (2/25/09)
I keep hearing about all this federal money that the state of Kentucky will get, but all I hear on the news is Louisville, Louisville, Louisville. What about all the other cities and small towns? All I hear is "Bring more jobs to Louisville" and "Help the Louisville Police Department." There are other towns and cities that could also use more jobs instead of building bridges that we really don't need.
From: James - Brandenburg, Kentucky (2/25/09)
I'm sure the Louisville Orchestra concert was very nice, but most of us watching you right now are unemployed -- some with no compensation -- and we're doing well just to have electricity and a TV to watch you.
From: Dominic - Charlestown, Indiana (2/25/08)
I was watching FOX 41 News and listening to reports on our high unemployment and poor economy. Then, the station manager appeared confused as to why citizens are not purchasing luxury items like tickets to a Louisville orchestra concert.
What part of this scenario is misunderstood?
From: Theresa - Louisville (2/24/09)
I just saw your Point of View and thoroughly appreciate your thoughts. We are a city that embraces the arts, and we're richly blessed with many diverse offerings. That said, I also question the lack of attendance and wish things would improve for our beleaguered orchestra.
For my part, I had not heard about the show and am not a member - but perhaps that is something to reconsider!
From: Leo - Utica, Indiana (2/24/09)
The musicians union killed support for the Louisville Orchestra. Speaking as a supporter of the arts in Louisville for 31 years, patrons like us want our artists to be as dedicated to art as their supporters. The union said in cle, ar terms that their members were dedicated to the dollars. I have not bought a ticket since.
I still love the other arts in Louisville, but not this group, no matter what the quality. Their hearts are in the wrong place. This is not correctable by some good PR person. In many people's eyes, they are just done.
The solution: disband and start anew.
From: Madeline - New Albany, Indiana (2/24/09)
Mr. Lamb asked why Whitney Hall was empty on a recent event. I know I cannot speak for everyone, but I personally haven't had that kind of money for the past couple of years.
Our economy is on the brink of disaster. Where has Mr. Lamb been?
From: Todd - LaGrange, Kentucky (2/19/09)
Bill, why get upset and decry someth, ing you have control over? Fox 41 did not have to go along with the other stations in the Louisville market. I think you should not speak out against something that you have direct control over and can fix. I believe that this one is on you guys.
Your editorial should have been:
"We at Fox 41 have prepared for the date of analog TV's demise. We have devoted resources that include man-hours, advertising time and real investment dollars in the new digital technology. Our viewers have been on notice for many months. We regret that the other stations in our area have not seen fit to boldly proceed with the timely switch. However, we at Fox 41 feel that we have adequately informed our viewing audience and we apologize to YOU IDIOTS that should have PAID ATTENTION. We will now change to our digital signal. Good night and good luck to those of you who will now see fuzz and not your "American Idol." We will see you in the 22nd Century when you decide to pay attention and get with the program.
"That's my Point of View."
From: Bob - Taylorsville, Kentucky (2/19/09)
OK, adding 13 dollars to a weekly paycheck is, supposed to do what? With gasoline prices on the rise -- even though there is ample supply -- and oil basically at it's lowest price per barrel in thirty years, the cost of a gallon of gas is breaking America. People seem to be happy about it being under two bucks a gallon, but with the rise coming this summer, how long will they be happy about it? I am not.
It seems the leader of this nation is working to lower the cost of housing for those that fouled up their own credit by one means or another. But the price of gasoline affects everyone that drives, and I think that if they worked on that it would put more money in everyone's pockets, which would boost the economy.
As long as the price of gas stays high, people are not going to spend like they used to. It's simple minded thinking to give us a little in our paycheck but take it back in the cost of gas. To save us a bunch on mortgage payments, only to take it back in the price of gas.
Why are the people this country puts in charge so dumb when it comes to common sense?
From: Janine - Louisville (2/19/09)
I am so excited about this stimulus package and what the mayor plans to use it for -- road improvements, bridges, etc. I have been unemployed since the beginning of October and I'm sure that within a week of Louisville getting its fair share, I will find employment.
Are the construction crews for these projects looking for a middle-aged, inexperienced woman to work with them? I am willing to work all the overtime necessary, since apparently this is the only industry that will be hiring anytime soon while everyone else will still be laying people off.
I want to get my application in first.
From: Michael - Falls of Rough, Kentucky (2/18/09)
The digital delay is a pity, but the stations had the choice to switch over before June. To imply that five to six percent of the population does not matter seems very elitist. "They have no bread? Let them eat cake." Or in this case, "Let them go hungry."
I believe sponsors would not agree to the same amount of money being spent to advertise a product to a reduced number of viewers.
From: Curt - LaGrange, Kentucky (2/12/09)
What gets me about the cigarette tax is that our government sued the tobacco companies for getting us hooked on their products. All that money is now long gone and now we're no better than a drug dealer trying to capitalize on everyone's addiction.
Why not raise sales tax by a cent? That would be fairer to everyone.
From: Joseph - Ghent, Kentucky (2/12/09)
I feel that the revenue from the alcohol taxes should only go to the wet or moist counties that sell alcohol. Why should the dry counties get money if they are not going to sell the products? It only seems fair, since the coal-producing counties are the only ones able to get the revenue from coal.
From: Christina - Louisville (2/11/09)
I am curious to know why or how Kentucky just broke ground for an equestrian center. Not that this is a bad idea. However, how many individuals are lucky enough to own a horse?
I am wondering why the pools in low income areas and Otter Creek Park must be shut down -- and some closed for good -- when a place for the fortunate is now being built. What about those less fortunate who looked forward to going for a swim or enjoying Otter Creek Park?
From: Tammy - Louisville (2/11/09)
With regard to the take-home cars for the Louisville police:
Who pays for the insurance, the gas, flat tires, oil changes, taxes, upkeep and everyday challenges having a car brings? If it's the taxpayers, they are getting off cheap. The 100-plus dollars they pay is far less than the $477.88 a month I paid for a Kia over five years, and I also paid for the gas, insurance, tax, flat tires etc.
I think the police are getting a bargain I know I would jump on. 90% of employers don't care how you get there -- just get there. They have a cheap ride with benefits I can't imagine. So they should stop complaining and pay for things we have to pay for at a much higher rate.
From: Don - Georgetown, Indiana (2/10/09)
Isn't it something for the president to go to Elkhart, Indiana -- an RV manufacturing town -- and tell them about jobs? Wasn't part of his platform stopping gas guzzling vehicles like RVs and the SUVs that pull them?
Wasn't the cost of fuel, a reason for the RV industry's decline? And yet Obama wants to get the price up to the level that destroyed the industry.
Aren't a majority of the luxury RVs purchased by high income people - a group that Obama wants to tax at a higher rate?
If the economy were in good shape, he would be shutting RV manufacturers down in order to keep h, is campaign promises.
From: Cheryl - Pleasure Ridge Park, Kentucky (2/6/09)
Why doesn't the city pass an ordinance that says "If a tree is within 25 feet from the center of the street on your property, you are responsible for it and the damages it causes. If you don't want liability, LG&E or the city will come and remove the tree from the area, at no cost to you?"
The one time cost of tree removal would outweigh the years of damage and trimming LG&E and the city always have to deal with because of trees growing and getting into the lines.
From: Andrew - Muldraugh, Kentucky (2/5/09)
I just watched the "Point of View" regarding gasoline prices and I must say, this guy needs to be grateful for what we do have. Oil has gone back up by several dollars a gallon and gas has gone up by 50 cents. However, this is still the lowest it has been since sometime in 2005.
When I returned from my initial military training in October of 2005, gas was over $2 a gallon. Anybody that thought that gas would stay at $1.39 a gallon for any length of time is very naive and wasn't watching the price of oil climb. Also, the recent ice storm disrupted supply into the area. Gas was still at $1.70 in the Fort Knox area before the storm, so we're lucky to only be paying $1.85 after an event that completely cut off supply.
I think this man needs to stand back and realize we haven't seen prices this low in over three years, and that if $1.85 is hurting your wallet that much, then you should seriously reconsider how much you drive. I can still fill my pickup truck for 35 bucks or less. That's not a lot of money, and even on that my truck can still last me up to two weeks.
From: Joanna - New Albany, Indiana (2/4/09)
Concerning the controversy over Michael Phelps:
It makes me angry that we are so worried about what a grown man does with his free time when we can go on My Space and see our young people doing drugs and God knows what else everyday. That's what people should be worried about. Go press charges against them and leave Michael Phillips alone.
Yes, he shouldn't do drugs. And yes, he should be a role model. But our kids will be more likely to do the same as their friends -- not a person they don't know.
From: Mick - Speed, Indiana (2/3/09)
Instead of giving the auto industries money, why are we not giving that money to the people in the form of a check for a set figure -- for example $10,000 toward the purchase of a new car? Who pay the taxes where the money comes from anyway? That would not only help the auto industries, but would also help those of us who could never afford a new car.
From: William - Louisville (2/3/09)
I have a question about these gas prices. If the price of oil is $40.08 today, then why have our gas prices jumped? If you take the average per gallon of $4.24 when oil was $146.56 a barrel, then why are we paying nearly $2.00 per gallon when oil is barely over $40? Shouldn't it be close to $1.19 a gal?
And where does this money go when they fine the companies for price-gouging? We (the consumers) are the ones that are getting ripped off!
From: Mary Lynne - Louisv, ille (1/29/09)
You are going to the wrong theater to see movies if you are being bothered by talkers and cell phones. You need to go to Baxter Avenue theaters on Bardstown Road. You will never have a problem with talkers or cell phone behavior. As you said, the age of the folks watching "Gran Torino" is the age of most folks at Baxter, as well as my husband and me.
From: Christi - Louisville (1/29/09)
I frequently go to the theatre to watch movies on the big screen just because I enjoy it that way. Very rarely do I encounter problems with people talking loudly or texting during the movie, and I actually go see a lot of movies geared towards young people.
From: Scott - Louisville (1/27/09)
I agree with Bill Lamb about the story on the PRP player. I really believe there is more to the story than we will ever know. Everybody hurt the day that death occurred, and we may never know why it truly happened. I can only imagine the pain both sides are experienc, ing. Proof and fact need to be known before judgment is rendered.
From: Patti - Georgetown, Indiana (1/27/09)
Concerning the PRP coach:
I don't understand how he can be charged when an autopsy was never performed. This boy may have had an undiscovered medical condition that contributed to or hastened his death. The body needs to be exhumed and an autopsy done. I hope the coach's attorney demands this.
From: Brian - Louisville (1/26/09)
Mr. Lamb, your Point of View on the passing of the torch and why this is the best country in the world was right on target. Our people only seem to see the pomp and ritual without grasping the reality that in 90% of the world, that day would have meant violence and death. Please continue airing your Point of View segments. I've followed them from the start, and am still amazed that no other General Manager in town has the courage to follow suit with their own editorials.
From: Sue - Del Rio, Texas (1/25/09)
I wish you would post a poll to see how our nation would vote in regards to the PRP coach's indictment being fair or unfair. I personally think the parents - and, frankly, Max -- knew the risks involved in participating in a very dangerous sport that involves layers of protective gear and always begins during the warmest season.
In Texas, if 94 degrees and humidity of 34% were dangerous criteria, football would never be played. It was Max's responsibility to stay hydrated. And no autopsy? What is that about? What if he had other unprescribed meds? Or what if the hospital made a mistake? Or what if...?
You can't blame the coach in this case and , it is frightening to think of the precedent this case could evoke in future sports injuries. It is sad -- very sad -- that a grand jury felt the need to go public with this charge. Maybe they just want a book to be written and have a post-trial comment included in that book.
From: Patrick - Louisville (1/21/09)
LG&E is trying to add a surcharge for storm clean-up. Before LG&E was sold to foreign interests, they maintained power lines and always showed a profit. That is the nature of private business, and they should step up and pay for their lack of maintenance.
If they were a public entity, the cost of repair and clean-up would have been paid at 75-90% by FEMA. That is the difference between private and public. Louisville residents instead get to pay this priva, tely-owned for-profit's portion.
From: Sherry - Louisville (1/20/09)
,
Yes, I do agree that the pilot that landed the distressed plane is a hero. But please do not forget that there was a co-pilot involved and four flight attendants. They are just as much heroes as the pilot.
Flight attendants go through some of the most rigorous and demanding training there is for situations like this. They are not just glorified waitresses. It was these flight attendants that risked their own lives to help save the passengers, but not once have I heard any comments on any news program commending these brave and selfless attendants.
What a shame. Flight attendants are not there just to serve you drinks and get you a pillow. They are there to save your life in situations that most people would agree are the scariest situations you could find yourself in. So my hero award goes to these selfless flight attendants. Thank you for being there to help save my life.
From: John - Louisville (1/20/09)
I do not feel you should dog Mr. Bunning for not being able to vote, when Mr. Obama has voted the fewest number of times in the history of the United State. But you,, the media, wanted Mr. Obama in the White House.
I am a Democrat. Even I could see through Mr. Obama's lies and inexperience. His first lie was that he would bring "change." There is no "change" when you bring the Clinton gang back in. His pick for Attorney General has no problem with taking the right to bear arms from the working man.
On another n, ote -- stop making Israel the "bad guy." They are protecting themselves after years of being attacked by Hamas and the real haters. If you knew anything about the Bible, you would know that the U.S.A. needs to stand beside and support Israel.
From: A.T. - Louisville (1/16/09)
Bill Lamb's editorial struck a nerve with me today. Here's the deal.
The DTV conversion commercials were put on the air a year in advance. The coupons were available, but expired in three months. No boxes were available until now.
I waited to request my coupon because I wanted to be sure it wouldn't expire before I could find a box to purchase. Now I am on a waiting list until coupons are available.
Thousands of us have lost our jobs. We can't afford cable and we can't afford this box without the coupon. I am hearing impaired. Television is necessary for me and my son in case of emergency. Seeing that your station boasts how they broadcast live closed captioning, I am sure you realize that all of us that are deaf are dependent on television in case of emergency.
Sure, they should postpone the change. Maybe Fox could cut their losses and offer some coupons as well. Who else is going to foot the bill? The billionaire broadcasting station that is only going to profit from more people with the converter boxes, or the unemployed tax payers that are trying to get coupons?
Seeing that the government was initiating the change, Fox should have anticipated problems. If they don't want to pay for the postponement, Fox should offer up some coupons to help stay on schedule. It is only five percent of us, after all, right?
The editorial made me feel unappreciated. It was an uneducated statement.
From: Robert - Mount Washington, Kentucky (1/14/09)
I may be wrong, but I think if people would buy American made products we would get out of the recession a lot faster.
From: Clyde - Louisville (1/15/09)
I was one of the people who voted for change. In the midst of all the things happening, there are banks and car companies asking for bailouts to help them. It sickens me when our President-elect is spending over $150,000 on redecorating the White House.
The American people can't ask for a bailout to help them eat or pay their electric bill. It seems like pride has taken over this country. Everyone has to be better than everyone else. Mr. Obama preached to us that change is coming, but he's wasting money like everyone else.
The time has come when the average American is sick of watching someone like the president of Ford make 13 million dollars a year while some people can't even afford food. If Mr. Obama is serious about "change," then let him put his money where his mouth is. How about taking that $150,000 for redecorating and help someone who's disabled or can't afford to have heat?
If the President is supposed to reflect the American people, then it's time for him to stop reflecting the upper class and show he cares about the lower class.
From: Jennifer - Waddy, Kentucky (1/14/09)<, /P>
I want to know why we can't legalize a sin tax on candy and sodas. They kill just as many people as cigarettes, and you could get more revenue. Just think about it -- a 25 cent tax on candy bars alone would bring more money in than a 70 cent tax on a pack of cigarettes.
I understand that our economy needs help and I know we all have to sacrifice, yet Frankfort only wants the smokers to suffer. Leave smokers alone. We can't get the state out of debt on our o, wn. Make everyone shoulder some of the responsibility.
From: Cheryl - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (1/12/09)
Why are there so many take-home cars currently in the school system? I've lived in large cities, and that would seem excessive even there. I hope your news team probes deeper into who has these cars, and why they have them.
At least trooper vehicles serve a purpose when not being used for official purposes. Take-home cars for school administrators just serve their families.
From: Raymond - Greenville, Indiana (1/9/09)
I am sure 69% would approve any increase in the cigarette tax, since it would not affect them. Would they approve if a tax were placed on all fattening food as listed by a nutritionist?
I am not a smoker. These taxes do not bother the wealthy. This is one of the few addictions the poor can afford, not being able to sit at the country club and snort coke and get smashed.
From: Steve - Floyds Knobs, Indi, ana (1/9/09)
On your recent comment regarding the bailout and money spent on advertising:
You sound like someone whose livelihood depends on advertising dollars. Wait -- I guess it does.
Your view is tainted by your job depending on that money coming in. Without advertising dollars, you and everyone at Fox 41 would have no job. So spending that bailout money on advertising benefits you. What other point of view would you have?
From: Tom - Crestwood, Kent, ucky (1/7/09)
In your video editorial regarding the possible demise of the Courier-Journal, I agree with most every point made. Thank you!
I would add that I believe the C-J's extreme liberalism is its downfall. While the Binghams were very liberal owners of the paper, I believe they believed in "people first," then profits -- unlike the current ownership.
I believe that if the C-J would dismiss half its editorial staff and management and replace those dismissed with conservative editors and writers -- including most importantly the headline writers -- the C-J would return to being a journalistic giant rather than the small political rag that it has become. Our home would re-subscribe to such a media source.
I think one only has to look at conservative talk radio versus liberal talk radio to understand my point.
From: Melissa - Louisville (12/30/08)
I would really appreciate it if you would show the budget crisis surrounding the police department and the mayor from the perspective of the police. They are doubling the price of the take-home car, and they want to cut their salaries and give them fewer hours.
The lives of those men are in danger every single day. They go through a lot. You have only been quoting the mayor and talking about his point of view, and the public only sees the mayor's side of the story -- which has been discussed every day for about a month -- on your station.
From: Mark - Louisville (12/24/, 08)
$1,200 a year for a take home car equals $100 a month -- and the city pays for all insurance, maintenance and gas. I wish I had a deal like that. I pay $600 a month for my car payment, insurance and gas.
So let's see...$600 a month or $100 a month? I'll take the $100 a month deal anytime.
From: Cheri - Louisville (12/22/08)
The mayor wants the city employees to give up raises and pay for a day to save money. At the same time he is saying it's going to cost five million dollars to compete a study on a bridge between Kentucky and Indiana. What good is this bridge going to be if there is no one to use it? Companies are going out of business, and people are losing their jobs and homes.
The same goes for the Arena. Is their motto "Build it and they will come?" How, if they have no money to buy tickets? Now gas is going up again. How high it will go?
The Governor wants to put a tax on cigarettes to help the education system. What happened to the idea that "if you vote to have the lottery, the money will go to the education fund?"
To my way of thinking, the mayor needs to think about the people who elected him. The priority here should be helping the people who need it instead of building things that people won't be able to afford to go see. I think housing, food, clothing, medical care and utilities should take precedence over a new bridge.
From: Sharon - Salem, Indiana (12/23/08)
I see a trend this year that is quite troubling to be me because so many are missing the larger picture.
Many families are foregoing Christmas gifts between adults and giving gifts only to the children in the family. I am very troubled by the trend, as I think it sends the wrong signal to our children.
In times when budgets are tight, everyone should learn the art of sacrifice and giving. Even children who still believe in Santa Claus can understand a story such as "There was a windstorm in he North Pole that knocked out the electricity and Santa is so far behind . . ." Need I say more?
If we sacrifice ourselves completely for our children, they will learn to be selfish and fail to understand that it takes the whole family working together to weather a financial storm. Additionally, a child may not understand why they got a gift but Santa forgot to get something for or Mommy or Daddy.
From: Gerald - Louisville (12, /21/08)
As a current member of the Louisville Fire Department and our Union Local 345, I take issue with the suggestion that we, as a group, have been "self-centered" concerning the budget crisis. In fact, our mayor has seen fit to flay plenty of "skin" from us in previous budget cuts, reduction of personnel and refusa, l to pay our members correctly, requiring us to take our case to the State Labor Board and the Courts.
After a favorable ruling, the mayor vindictively responded by discont, inuing our State Incentive pay (not because of any budget "crisis" but simply because he didn't want to pay us the required overtime). The result has been a nearly $130 involuntary pay cut PER PAY PERIOD. He then has the gall to state that he was "baffled" as to why our union refused to accept a further pay cut of 2%.
As usual, OUR side of the story gets relatively little attention in the media and the general public is left with the question of why we're at odds with the mayor. It's simple -- he continues to stonewall on paying us correctly while "asking" us to give up what we haven't received. I am certain that if we were paid what is rightfully owed to us we would willingly do our share to bear the load in times of need. Instead,, not only have we been FORCED to give "skin," but we're being asked to contribute an arm and a leg also.
This is unacceptable. Our Mayor's own stubborn unwillingness to treat us fairly was the catalyst for the position we've taken -- not shameless, inconsiderate self- preservation, as is often suggested.
From: Joe - Louisville (12/19/08)
Why close, Otter Creek Park? How much money does the city waste each year on the Extreme Park, including constant removal of graffiti? And how much is the insurance to protect the city from all the injuries?
The mayor has wanted to close Otter Creek for years and his mismanagement of money is just a poor excuse to close the park. If the city is so short on money, why do we continue to overdevelop downtown, including the latest City Center project?
From: Mike - Louisville (12/17/08)
As a former union officer and employee of the former City of Louisville, I know firsthand how "me-centered" and obstructionist the police and fire unions are. Just like the UAW has helped run the auto industry into the hole they are in, the FOP seems to be pretending to be the UAW of law enforcement.
By the way, whatever the cost the city may charge for the use of a vehicle that one does not own, and does not pay gas or insurance on, is in all probability a huge bargain. In these tough economic times we are all looking for a bargain.
Chief White -- put me down for a take home car. I will pay for it under those conditions.
From: Heather - Louisville (12/17/08)
I strongly agree with you that "everyone must have skin in the game," but let's be honest. Did Mayor Abramson lose that much skin in the game? He seems to still have all his projects pushing forward. In return, we have skinned our firefighters and police force.
The families of this state are giving things up for a cause -- the cause of trying to keep a roof over their children's head and food on the table. Does anyone really believe that the majority of Louisville residents care about an arena or more bars in downtown Louisville?
We are struggling as a nation to even provide the essentials for survival. And believe me, none of the above is essential to life. As for the Rainy Day fund, my question to Mayor Abramson is this: What , do you consider a rainy day? I believe we have surpass, ed rain, and are now in a flood (with no paddles).
From: Bruce - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (12/16/08)
I have no sympathy for the police officers who have to pay $100 a month to ta, ke their vehicles home. My insurance alone is more than that, not to mention fuel and repairs. In my opinion, a "take home car" is a privilege, not a right. I would love for someone to provide me with a vehicle -- including insurance, repairs and fuel -- for only $100 a month, and I am sure all viewers would like a deal like that.
From: Paul - Louisville (12/14/08)
I am having a hard time understanding the whole gas vs. oil issue. It seems like that when oil goes up, the cost of gas also goes up. That is understandable. But when oil goes down in price, the price at the pump does not reflect this change. For example, if oil goes up, say, $4 a barrel, you can expect gas to rise about 20-30 ce, nts, which it did this past week. However, when oil the very next day went down $3, one might expect that the price at the pump should also go down just as fast.
I wish the oil executives would settle on some kind of deal that would make it so that when oil goes down, gas goes down just as fast.
Why do we, the consumers, have to suffer just so that the CEOs of these companies can get ric, her? I just wish someone would answer for these ridiculous 20-, 30- and 40-cent hikes in the price of gas literally overnight.
From: Tab - Fisherville, Kentucky (12/12/08)
I have watched as the U.S. Government tries to understand what to do, and how to do it, to insure that the economy of the U.S. is not crippled by the failure of the Big Three automakers. As I have watched all this, I keep seeing one thing: None of the Big Three has brought forth a truly revolutionary idea to help reform the current industry they manage.
The Senate sees this as "the same old thing," and some of them don't want to allow a bail-out or even a partial , bail-out, since all they see is the same old thing with no changes. So why should we throw good money after bad? Good point!
If Mullally, Wagoner or Nardali had brought a well thought-out plan to present, we would be working on the implementation of that well-designed plan. But no one offered that, so here we are -- deadlocked and scared to death!
Why is it so hard to see that so much money is begin wasted and squandered, while no significant changes have been brought&n, bsp;forth? All these executives are doing is paying lip service, trying to win support for the same old thing, and hoping that maybe, just maybe, they can effect some simple changes, ask for concessions, and hope the economy turns around and all will be all rosy again.
Well it will never be as it once was. And the Big Three will continue to produce cars and trucks that are not efficient enough. And it goes around and around.
I feel so strongly that these three need to become one. I also feel, after watching everything that has transpired lately, that Ford seems to have the best chance of helping to right all this by being the one company that spearheads this merger. With a team in place and the government's assistance, we can turn this around. It would be a huge mistake to bail out the automotive industry without taking the bold steps to put this country on a whole new path, a far stronger and productive path.
From: Anthony - Louisville (12/12/08)
Why should the 30% of people who are smokers carry the burden of generating additional revenue for the state when this should be shared by all? I would also like to know if the governor and the mayor would like to respond to the email, s I also wrote to them on this matter.
From: Joel - Louisville (12/12/08)
I cannot believe once again it's time for "Let's hit the smokers."
Here's an idea: More people drink, so why don't they raise taxes on alcohol? Or would that cost too many politicians money?
I just found out today at work while renewing my benefits that my health benefits will now be included in my income when calculating local taxes. How much blood do they want? Between Beshear and Abramson, I'm dying here. Where is my bailout?
Hey Yarmuth and McConnell -- give me a check and let me start over. It's my money anyway.
F, rom: Mike - Leitchfield, Kentucky (12/12/08)
Why is it that every time there's a money shortfall, we, the people that smoke and have a beer, are the ones that have to make it up? What's wrong with taxing everyone that drinks their 10-12 Cokes and Mountain Dews every day?
You know we are the fattest nation in the world. How many millions would 10 cents a can make? Where's the sin tax going to come from if we all quit smoking and drinking?
From: Robert - Mount Washington, Kentucky (12/11/08)
Every time a city or state gets into financial problems, the first thing they do is increase the tax on tobacco products. They claim the expected increase of revenue to the government is the justification and that it will "pay the bills." Then they also claim it will help to reduce the number of smokers.
Having said that, if the number of smokers is decreased, how can there be an increase of revenue to the government? If fewer people are smoking, will that fact not increase life expectancy, and thereby the cost of health care, because people will be living longer?
When governments need more money why do they not increase taxes on things the wealthy consume? If the desired effect is to stop smoking, then what will they tax next to make up for the lost revenue from non-smokers?
From: Dan - Memphis, Indiana (12/11/08)
Congress is giving the bailout money to the wrong groups. Congress is ready to give the car manufacturers billions of dollars so they can operate for just a few months. The car manufacturers will build thousands of cars in this period but who is going to buy these cars?
The fastest way to stimulate our economy is to give the bailout money to the consumers of this country. I propose to give every taxpaying family $80,000 and every taxpaying single person $30,000. This m, oney will get spent and into the economy faster than the Fed can get it into the mainstream economy.
I have devised a fair and equitable way to distribute this money quickly and get it in the consumers' hands. The Fed can use the income tax rolls to qualify consumers for the distribution of funds.
From: Nettie - Louisville (12/10/08)
To the three Metro Council members who voted not give up three days pay: It would not hurt you to give up a month's pay. One member of the Council told me they spend about three hours a month in their office, so the salary they are paid is a joke anyway.
Fro, m: Jason - Louisville (12/9/08)
Why doesn't the government pay off, or pay up to $100,000 toward, every home mortgage in the country instead of bailing out corporate America? That way, the same money is being spent, the banks are still getting the money and the homeowner has also just freed up $7-800 a month in money they can spend elsewhere, boosting the economy for everyone -- not just the banks.
If you're going to spend all that money, you might as well use it to help the people as well as the businesses, and in the me, antime have something to show for it other than lavish trips to resorts and hotels with spas and corporate bonuses for CEOs that -- let's face it -- don't deserve those bonuses if they had to be bailed out.
Hey, it might even help elected officials look good across both party lines. If we are going to lean towards a socialist economy, let's do it a smarter way, rather than writing checks to people who have already done a bad job with the money they had.
From: Dawnette - Louisville (12/9/08)
Think about this. Instead of the government handing over $15 billion to save the "Big Three," wouldn't it be better if our government took $1 billion and handed out vouchers to the middle and lower income families for, say, $15,000 toward the purchase of a new, American-made, fuel-efficient car?
They are going to hand over money to these people who have already made their millions and drove these companies down to where they are today. Even if this money helps the "Big Three," it will not do any good unless the economy takes a turn for the better. People still can't afford to buy these cars, which means that in the long run, these companies will still be broke 4-6 months down the road. But if our government would put money back into the American people's hands to buy vehicles, this would pick the auto market up, and save billions.
This whole situation angers me. My husband was in the building industry his whole life. I am disabled due to a work-related injury. We have never lived beyond our means. Now, we are weeks away fr, om filing bankruptcy because of the economy.
The government is not willing to jump in and help us!
From: Tony - Mount Washington, Kentucky (12/6/08)
Once again, Louisville sports fans are demonstrating their lack of support for the local team when it is losing. It's like kicking a man when he is down. They forget that not every team can win all of the time. This is probably the main reason Louisville cannot attract a major league sports team.
As far as placing the blame on som, eone, place ALL of it on that , traitor Bobby 'I'm not leaving' Petrino! This year's U of L football team was recruited by Petrino, as is next year's. Kragthorpe's recruits won't really take over for two more seasons. Petrino is the one that left the team in a real mess, and it will take Kragthorpe some time to straighten out the situation.
Also, I find it more than disgusting the way Petrino is treated as some sort of darling by the local media. He screwed U of L, then the NFL's Atlanta Falcons. He's not a darling, he's a bum! A back-stabbing, disloyal, split-on-you-in-a-second type of traitorous, insidious villain. Every fan of U of L football or any other NCAA or professional sports team should turn their back on this traitor and the media should completely ignore him.
From: Linda - Louisville (12/5/08)
I would like to respond to the mayor's recent proposal to cut back on things such as junk pick up every three months. How awful! The city looks horrible as it is.
I live in the south end of Louisville, and everywhere I go, there is litter! Also, there are signs everywhere that claim "$500 fine for littering." If this were really the case, then our city budget would not be in such a downfall. I wonder how much money was spent on those signs we see about littering and how often are they replaced? If the mayor would start fining homeowners and renters -- or landlords who allow their renters to litter -- on a habitual basis, then this great city of ours would have money in surplus.
Think, Louisville, about what you say. Remember also what those signs on the side of busses claim -- that "Litter makes us all look bad." How much money was spent on those signs? Louisville needs to get serious about things and quit threatening.
From: Mary - New Albany, Indiana (12/5/08)
I would like to thank Bill Lamb for his support of the US automakers. There's something really fishy about the negative way they are being portrayed by certain members of Congress and all of the media I have seen or read. Where is the outrage toward the financial sector as they continue to plunder our economy as they see fit? How many corporate jets did they use to get to Washington?
,
I have yet to see an investigative report examining just how level the playing field is for the Big Three and foreign automakers with their new factories, tax incentives, cheap labor and benefits, etc.
From: Jason - Louisville (12/5/08)
Why doesn't the government pay off, or pay up to $100,0, 00 on, every home mortgage in the country instead of bailing out corporate America? That way, the same money would be spent, the banks would still get the money and the homeowner will be freed of up to $700-$800 a month in money that they can spend elsewhere, boosting the economy for everyone, not just the banks.
If you're going to spend all that money, you might as well use it to help the people as well as the businesses, and in the meantime have something to show for it other than lavish trips to resorts and hotels with spas, and corporate bonuses for CEOs that -- let's face it -- don't deserve those bonuses if they had to be bailed out.
Hey, it might even help elected officials look good across both party lines.
If we are going to lean towards a socialist economy, let's do it a smarter way, other than writing checks to people who have already done a bad job with the money that they had.
From: Don - Louisville (12/5/08)
I'm concerned about this $20 million Mayor Abramson needs. Where did this debt come from all of a sudden? Who pays it back? Is $20 million enough? Was he not listening when our Governor said our budget was short by over $400 million?
This really makes me sad that Louisville and our entire country strives off keeping Americans in fear. We hear of $700 billion-plus going to bankers who messed things up and then spent money on spa treatments for stress. Now the Big Three automakers want to be bailed out because they messed up and have not come up with an agenda or plan to show how they will utilize the money.
And now Louisville! Mayor Abramson has said Louisville needs $20 million urgently to take care of the budget so it doesn't get worse. Well, I may not be a politician but I think the first thing I would do is take a pay cut myself and then work from my office down and start getting people to retire early, take pay cuts, work fewer hours, or possibly have do layoffs as a last resort. I would communicate with my staff and see who would be willing to tighten their belts for the greater good of their city, state or country.
I know I would not start cutting police, firefighters, and EMS off the top. I think, with all the fear that is rapidly spreading across America, we might need them when things really get worse, and I think it will.
I have been unemployed for over a year and I have had to tighten my belt and live life a little differently but I'm not panicking. I have faith in prayer, and in America, Louisville and Kentucky. I will not ask what this city can do for me but what I can do for my city, state and America.
Mayor Abramson? What are you giving up for your city?
, ;
From: Bill - Lanesville, Indiana (12/5/08)
The police department in Louisville has the citizens believing they are a front line force in protecting this country. This is wrong. They are not a military force, although they are disgracing the awards given to out U.S. military.
It is unlawful to award a cop the Purple Heart, Medal of Honor or any other military award given to combat troops. I have taken this up with the VFW and my congressman and senator.
From: Gary - Louisville (12/5/08)
Why do you continue to give the mayor a free pass? A budget crisis was never mentioned until the mayor lost his last appeal in the case involving the city firefighters. Now that he owes three times the initial amount, he announces a crisis.
He also never hesitates to blame the police and firefighters for not being team players.
From: Tom - Mount Washington, Kentucky (12/4/08)
Are you failing to recognize that even in the face of economic troubles, Mayor Abramson paid out millions of dollars to Cordish? That, my friend, is why people are putting blame on the mayor.
The mayor should also accelerate any process to sell Otter Creek Park to the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources since it is a burden of the city of Louisville.
From: Ray - Louisville (12/2/08)
I'm wondering what your view is on the fact that Louisville has been hit by a storm which has the money meter rising to the point of drowning us, while the mayor has a rainy day fund of $60 million. If my math is right, we need $20 million to stop the bleeding. That would leave $40 million in this fund.
Why aren't we doing this?
From: William - Lanesville, Indiana (12/2/08)
I think it's time that the mayor of Louisville tells the Gestapo (FOP) who is supposed to be running Louisville. I see they went to the meeting wearing their long black trench coats -- just like the mobsters that they are.
These people are making $60,000 in base pay and $30,000 in benefits. They should be forced to take a cut one way or another. They say they are worried about the safety and welfare of the citizens of Louisville, but that's bull.
Take away their take home cars and cut their pay raises -- just like the rest of the city workers have to do. And if that doesn't work, take away their overtime. This would save a fortune because their overtime is phony anyway. There should be no overtime, since they are supposed to work eight-hour shifts just like everyone else.
They should get to work on time to relieve the, y pe, rson they are supposed to be relieving.
From: Lois - Sonora, Kentucky (12/2/08)
Instead of taking money from the firefighters and police who keep the community safer, why not take part of it from Mayor Abramson's pay, his inflated staff, and the rest from that big joke called the "Arena project?" It seems to me it would make more sense to hold up on the Arena than to take money from those who are protecting the entire city.
Where is good old common sense and logic? The Arena isn't protecting anyone - the police and fire fighters are. If the Mayor and other city officials gave back part of their pay and perks like Ford's CEO is willing to do, then maybe others wouldn't feel so strongly about giving a little.
Lots of people are next to illiterate already, so let's close the libraries so they will have even less places to learn.
Is that the common sense way? No -- just Louisville's and Mayor Jerry Abramson's way.
Thank God I don't live in Louisville or Jefferson County.
From: Nancy - Louisville (12/2/08)
If the mayor wants everyone to cut back, why don't he and his staff cut his/their paychecks by 20-25%? The Metro Council members should also receive 10-15% pay cuts as well since they are our representatives.
Why does he always want stuff to be built in the downtown area and not improve areas like Riverport, Dixie Highway, Okolona, etc.? Riverport has lost a lot of businesses to neighboring states and has fallen in business. What is wrong with that picture?
That is my concern, and I am sure ther, e are many more that feel the same way I do.
From: W.H. - LaGrange, Kentucky (12/1/08)
My comment is on the mayor wanting his workers to take a cut in pay or give up something that would save money.
It's pretty bad when the mayor wants to spend money on projects that make him look good to people that don't work for the city. Ask any Louisville metro worker what they think of the mayor. The mayor does not take care of the people who truly make Louisville what it is. From what I see, he is too busy putting on fireworks for the Derby and financing buildin, gs we don't need at this time.
He said he was taking a 10% cut in pay. Someone needs to put that on the news about how much BIG MONEY he will still make. And he still has a driver to take him everywhere he goes. Who pays for that? We do.
Right now he says "either take a pay cut or you will be laid off." Well, wait until he has a lot of snow on his road and can't get out because he laid the workers off. , Or his house catches fire but there aren't enough firemen to put the fire out because he laid then off.
Do you see my point? There are way too many things that he should have already cut back on. Times are very tough for the, middl, e and lower class people and cutting pay or laying them off would be really bad.
From: Sharon - Louisville (12/1/08)
I just received my water bill, and I was shocked to see how much it was because the MSD part had gone up again. The little person who is trying to live within a budget doesn't stand a chance because of all these stupid rate increases.
Please explain this to me, because I certainly don't understand.
From: William - Louisville (11/28/08)
We are dumb, disloyal and ungra, teful Americans, and we deserve to be blamed for most of the economic problems happening today.
Ford and GM have given us baby boomers and yuppies millions and millions in scholarships to educate us, and we repay them by going out and buying imports.
If we let the domesti, c auto industry go belly-up, the USA will also go belly-up.
Wake up, stupid Americans.
From: Amber - Louisville (11/25/08)
I personally know a Louisville police officer that drives his family around everywhere - even to family functions -- in his take-home police vehicle, even though he owns a vehicle that is more than big enough to handle them. He has also admitted that he has "more vacation days than he can ever take."
As a school teacher who pays $250 a month for my very modest vehicle (without gas), I wonder why -- when everyone in our economy has taken a hit -- the police are not willing to do the same.
From: Dennis - Louisville (11/25/08)
If the mayor wants to cut back on spending, why doesn't he start at the top of his office? He has five assistant mayors and at least two spokespersons at a cost of about $85,00o or better for each person. Why can't he eliminate those assistant mayors, as well as their personal workers? That would save the budget about a million dollars or more.
Why does he even have a driver? Can't he drive on his own?, Why take away the take-home police cars? They just provide more s, ecurity for all those around our homes.
He talks about saving, but it seems all he's doing is spending -- flying here and there and he comes back empty-handed. If he wants cuts, then why not be a leader and start cutting costs from the top?
From: Nancy - Irvington, Kentucky (11/24/08)
While all the auto workers are worrying about their jobs and whether the big auto companies will get bailed out or not, I'd like to see what Obama is going to do about cutting spending on the , Inauguration. It costs millions. That would be a nice start for him.
From: Jaime - Louisville (11/21/08)
Good afternoon. I work for a real estate office and have heard of this new federal tax credit of up to $7,500 for new home buyers. I understand that it's to help get people buying homes, etc., and that it is a loan to be paid out of their tax returns at $500 per year for 15 years.
However, my thought is this: If the government can "loan" new home buyers this money, why couldn't they "loan" money to all families that are in trouble? Foreclosures and short sales are hurting people and their families, and it just seems to me that somehow the government could step in and help if they wanted to.
If it's just a "loan" anyway, it seems that it could be used to help people who are in trouble financially. I'm sure I don't fully understand the politics of the situation. But I am really just sending this to see if anyone else agrees or has information regarding the technical aspect of the tax credit.
From: Jeff - Louisville (11/21/08)
I think your premise is off just a bit. It may be the best thing that has happened to this country yet if these companies do not get the bailout, .
Why? If they do not, they will not necessarily fail, but will go into bankruptcy protection. Why is this good? All labor contracts will be off and the companies will then be able to compete globally in this industry as they reduce the wages of the labor to "real world" numbers.
Perhaps this is the very reason why Toyota, Nissan and Honda are not there in Washington also asking for money. The big three -- as you say -- make quality cars (I own two) and their fuel efficiency is comparable. This is why it pains me to hear them say that the sole reason for their crisis is the current economic downturn. If this were truly the main cause of their crisis, the other car manufacturers would be asking for money as well.
The UAW president already has said they will offer no more concessions. Apparently, their concern is not truly for the worker. Their unwillingness to be competitive with their wages (globally) may cause some of these workers to lose their jobs. And heaven forbid the dissolving of a bloated cancer on American industry (the union).
This can be good because our companies will then be able to compete. We, the taxpayers, cannot continue t, o subsidize such blatant mismanagement. Perhaps this is also the reason why both Democrats and Republicans are getting a lambasting from their constituents over the 700 billion dollar travesty passed earlier this year. Maybe they will listen to the people this one time.
From: Kevin - Louisville (11/20/08)
I agree with some of Bill Lamb's comments about a bailout for the auto industry. Th, eir failure would be catastrophic for our country.
However, how many more companies and industries will we, have to bail out? And is not bankruptcy an option for failing businesses that gives them an opportunity to reorganize?
Americans are very tired of hearing about executive salaries, bonuses, private jets and extravagant retreats. I do not agree that U.S. automakers are making quality products. They've improved but still not on par with Japanese automakers. Where is the real innovation, the real commitment to good gas mileage and use of alternative fuels? If loans are made, we need definite guarantees about how the money will be used, and it should not be for executive perks, dividends, and acquisitions -- as it seems that AIG and the banks are using their newfound source of funds.
From: Michael - Louisville (11/20/08)
I have a real problem with the bailout of the Big Three automakers. I am the owner of a small business in Louisville and , I've been struggling in this economy as well. But the big difference between them and me is that when my company can't cover payroll or pay the bills, I take my own personal money and pay it. I have depleted my savings accounts and run up my personal credit cards to the max just to keep the business open and my employees with jobs.
Do I see the big 3 CEOs doing that? No! Instead they fly to DC in their corporate jets, when t, hey could have used commercial airlines much cheaper.
I am sickened by the waste of money these companies have paid out to the CEOs -- millions of dollars in salaries while the, y're laying off blue collar workers. If Congress wants to bail them out, then Congress needs to have a review board that determines how and where they spend this money. And congress should require that all CEOs forego their salaries until the companies are solvent. Le, e Iaccoca did it years ago with Chrysler.
When I don't have the money, I don't get paid. But I make sure that my employees do. Right now I am in a situation in which I need $50,000 to replace worn out equipment. I can't get a loan to save my life. How about bailing out guys like me, and not guys who waste money in the millions.
From: Derek - Louisville (11/20/08)
From my recent research in buying a new car, I have found that the statement "Ford and GM are putting cars on the road that are equal to those cars from Japan" is far from true. On top of that, I worked with a former Ford employee who said the practices that went on there and the attention to quality were terrible. He even told me that on new Ford trucks there are usually problems with certain items, and then he took me to a sales lot to personally show me. Sure enough, he was correct. There were VISIBLE deficiencies if you knew where to look. He was friends with a fellow engineer at Toyota who said this sort of thing didn't go on in his facility.
My point is, saying that people's perceptions about the superiority of foreign automakers is wrong is either unwarranted or a partial truth. If, you meant to say SOME Ford and GM products are as good as or better than SOME Japanese made vehicles, then you would not be lying --, just bending truths.
My wife and I do love your Point of View segments, and usually agree with them. This is the first time I felt I needed to call you out.
From: Warren - Harned, Kentucky (11/20/08)
I believe to get the economy going, the $700 billion should be divided out to American families that make less than $150,000 per year. If each family received $20,0000 to $25,0000, they would be able to get out of debt, buy a new car or pay off their mortgage or buy a new home. This would get the economy going instead of bailing out the large banks and the auto industry.
From: Jim - Corydon, Indiana (11/19/08)
Thanks to Bill Lamb for the kudos for Harrison County and our use of the riverboat tax investments.
A couple of facts - you stated that since 1998 Louisville residents have spent/lost $250 million at the casino. I think that number may be significantly higher. Another point often missed is that around 18% of Harrison County's annual casino tax proceeds are shared with New Albany, Floyd County, Crawford County and other neighbors. The gross dollars don't all stay here.
From: Mike - Louisville (11/19/08)
I am starting t, o believe the Democrats blocking the casino vote are not capable of understanding that Kentucky tax dollars are going to Indiana casinos. And if this is the case we have a serious problem.
From: Kathy - Louisville (11/19/08)
I just heard some state employees are getting raises - at least one getting 50% this year. Some people don't even make $20,000 in a year, and this man gets a $62,000 increase in one.
Who voted on this, and why? Next time they are up for election, guess who I am not voting for. What happened to budget shortfalls?
I guess his family will have a Happy Holiday while our taxes will go up next year.
From: Jay - Taylorsville, Kentucky (11/16/08)
It is time for our government to take some drastic steps to save our economy. Here is an average guy's look at the problem:
Send each family in the country that makes less than $200,000 a year $20,000 dollars. This would help those losing their homes, thus bailing out the lenders. Then make said lenders give that family a fixed rate at the same rate that they started the loan. The families that are not losing their homes may be able to buy a home.
I would be willing to wager every car in the country would be sold, so the Government would need to put a temporary freeze on auto prices, thus saving , the auto industry.
The real problem we as a country face is a loss of cash flow in the lower to middle classes and jobs. The next step is to regulate wages that our businesses pay foreign (third world) workers. Pay them enough to participate in the economy or pay a tariff to make up the difference. This would make the world market grow, helping everyone worldwide.
Business and political leaders better start looking out for the whole pie, not just their share of it. A bigger pie will make their piece bigger without a larger share. Giving the ones who messed things up is not the answer. Give it to the people, let them decide who gets it.
From: Ellis - Louisville (11/14/08)
The gas increase is beyond me. If demand is down and the price of a barrel is down, then there, , should be no increase. I watch the barrel price, and this seems like a big smoke screen, and we, as the consumers have to pay the price. It is not fair that in a time of financial crisis, people with lower incomes should have to contribute to the oil companies. After all, the lower price on gas is the only bright spot in our financial dilemma.
From: Charles - Louisville (11/14/08)
If the post office would cut back to a five-day work week and forget about Saturday, they might be able to save money. There'd be less cost for labor, trucks, fuel, utility costs, etc.
Who really needs mail on Saturday? And if someone thinks that Saturday mail should be kept, let them pay for a special cost stamp to have that service.
From: Emily - Louisville (11/13/08)
I'm glad that more young adults decided to vote this year, but what disturbs me is their lack of education on the candidate they were choosing. I'm not saying they weren't informed, but I asked three of my friends who they were voting for and when I asked them why, they c, ould not give me any plans or idea that sparked their interest for that candidate. They simply said "He will bring change to America" or "He has more experience."
I hope that in the future, more voters educate themselves on what the candidates say they are actually going to do instead of what sounds good.
From: Bill - Louisville (11/12/08)
Let's separate the two topics in the "Party Lines" Point of View. I agree that it is highly suspect that the City Center votes split Democrat v Republican. But the votes usually are, and this is a core reason that government at all levels is not responsive to the people. The majority, of legislators vote according to the party bosses.
But on the City Center deal itself - why should we give millions of dollars to the Cordish Company? How on earth can you call them "trustworthy?" They are a for-profit company, not even a government entity. There is no reason at all to give them a huge chunk of downtown property.
If they want it, let them buy it.
From: John - Louisville (11/4/08)
I'm proud that the people of America have decided to show support for their political choices at the polls. However, as a regular voter I question their support for their political choice.
Where were they, four, eight, 12 or even 16 years ago? As a veteran with 28 years of service defending their right to vote and their freedom, I challenge them to keep the voting spirit alive. Let's not make this a one time issue.
Remember, JFK said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country."
From: Dave - Louisville (11/3/08)
I have noticed that radio and TV stations do not support political candidates. How and why can the Courier-Journal and other newspaper get away with supporting a candidate? What or who gave them this right?
Over my 58 years in Louisville, I have observed that the Courier almost always endorses a Democrat, no matter his or her record. To me, this is just another reason on a long list as to why newspapers are a dying breed.
Hopefully, the national TV and radio media will wake up one of these days and realize they need to report news and quit trying to , "make" the news. They can also go the way of the ever-declining newspapers!
From: Ron - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (11/2/08)
I'm sitting at my computer sick to my stomach. I had been watching one of my favorite TV shows, "The Andy Griffith Show" when it was interrupted by a special commercial by Ron Howard where he dressed up like Opie Taylor and talked to Paw Taylor about the changes needed in America -- of course promoting Barack Obama. Then he became his character on "Happy Days" and talked to the Fonz about the same thing.
Now this is what makes me angry as a retired preacher: They told me I could not promote a particular candidate from the pulpit or I could be in danger of going to jail. But actors can use programs like "Andy Griffith" and it is OK.
We talk about changes, but no one in either the Democratic or Republican parties will ever make changes in America because one group wants to take away guns from good citizens, give us socialism, take away the rights of babies to be born and encourage laziness, while the other party wants to be greedy and abuse its power.
The only thing that matters is which party is in control. We, the Americans, do not matter to anyone in these parties. These campaigns have made me sad. Both parties have sunk to the lowest level I have seen in my life. To be honest I am scared.
What needs to happen is for God to come and clean house in the Congress and the White House the way He cleansed the temple in the New Testament. Then we can put an honest man in charge who is proud to be and American -- not a Republican or a Democrat.
But I know I am living for the moment in a dream world. So I remain sad and disgusted. But I will go and vote Tuesday.
From: Steve - Louisville (10/30/08)
Bill Lamb's Point of View on McConnell was excellent. Rarely do I find news channels put aside liberal or right wing points of view and think about what is best for our state. He was right on point and I found a news channel that puts the local community first.
Don't get me wrong -- I don't agree with everything Bill has to say, but I know I don't have to listen to Fox News on cable every day to get a balanced view. Keep up the good work and you gained a new viewer.
From: Frank - Salem, Indiana (10/30/08)
I have a questi, on in this political year that I have not heard brought up in any news medium. I keep hearing about how the Republicans are leading us down the wrong road. I also keep hearing that if we elect Democrats things are going to change.
The question I have is this: Since the Democrats already have a majorit, y in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, why haven't we already seen some of the positive changes they keep talking about that ar, e going to come about if they - and Barack Obama -- get elected?
From: Ronald - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (10/30/08)
In response to your "Darts and Laurels" broadcast of 10/16/08, I too would like to commend Norton Healthcare for renewing their commitment to underwriting the closed captioning on all Fox 41 newscasts. Computer technology makes things like this so easy to help the impaired.
As for other "Darts and Laurels," I think you missed one of each:
Laurels to all the local news stations. Every local news station in our area now has a website where viewers can be directed in order to get more in-depth info about news items, etc. This is a great service for the community. However...
Darts to all the local news stations. Not everyone has a computer. I get so disgusted when the news anchors tell you only the high points of a story, then direct us to their web site for more info. If you don't have a computer, watching the news is like reading a newspaper that contains only headlines.
As I said, this is a great service, but I think it is being over used.
From: Ron - New Albany, Indiana (10/29/08)
Not surprisingly, another Fox channel CEO has chosen to endorse a Republican. Mitch McConnell has brought money via earmarks back to Kentucky (which are scheduled to end soon) and supported a declaration of war against Iraq that we all know now was for unfounded reasons, yet so many programs have been cut, including child welfare and loan reimbursement programs -- not to mention the state of an economy compounded by increasing prices and decreasing retirement funds.
I have served our country -- and now our community -- as a nurse, and am more than willing to give, my vote to someone with less experience to change a government that has obviously become less for the people and more for personal gain.
From: Robert - Louisville (10/29/08)
Mr. Lamb's endorsement of Mitch McConnell is based on the idea that Mitch is bringing home the bacon and has influence for Kentucky. While I won't dispute this, that doesn't mean that he should continue to represent us.
Senator McConnell represents the worst in politics. He and his wife have been undying supporters of President Bush's policies that have decimated our country's finances and now our own finances. McConnell is friends with people like Bob Murray, the coal mine owner whose lax safety led to the deaths of nine people. McConnell controls the purse strings for the Republican Party, and has helped spread the Rovian political smears that have unfairly (and falsely) attacked dozens of good men and women.
Mitch may be bringing home the bacon, but so did Ted Stevens. Just because he may be "good for Kentucky" doesn't mean he is ethical or good for America.
That's why I'm voting Bruce Lunsford this year. And I'll vote against him if necessary the next election cycle.
From: Danita - Brandenburg, Kentucky (10-29-08)
I am personally offended by the hanging of Governor Palin's likeness in California. The "news" blows it off as no big deal. But here in Kentucky at one of our universities they are searching for the people that hung a likeness of Obama and are screaming embarrassment and outrage. , Another university in the Midwest is prosecuting pranksters for hanging an Obama likeness.
Why is it considered acceptable to hang the likeness of a female vice-presidential candidate and not acceptable to hang that of a male presidential candidate? It is either gender or race in either case that is pushing the level of acceptance.
From: Darlene - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (10/28/08)
Thank you! Your comments were exactly how I feel about Mitch McConnell. Thank you for putting my thoughts and feelings so eloquently into words. I pray the majority of the Commonwealth will realize how valuable Mitch McConnell is to Kentucky and how blessed we are to have him working for us and representing us in our Nation's Capital.
From: Les - Jeffersonville, Indiana (10/28/08)
It's amazing that you have the nerve to endorse a candidate for U.S. Senate who can't even show up for a debate with his opponent. After watching your endorsement, I turned the channel to catch the U.S. Senate debate on public television. I was shocked to see that Sen. McConnell was a no show. So instead of praising Se, n. McConnell, you should take him to task for refusing to debate the issues and answer questions on the important issues facing our country.
It was obvious that you are more concerned about who the Courier-Journal endorses and less about demanding accountability from candidates. Shame on you!
From: Patti - Goshen, Kentucky (10/28/08)
You need to stay away from politics. News stations -- and you -- need to inform the public with the facts, not try to sway them to vote one way or the other. The way you presented your point of view about, McConnell and Lunsford can cause people to get fired up (just like Palin has been doing) and get ugly. You need to stay away from dirty tactics just like the politicians should. It may be your opinion, but someone in a position such as yours needs to be careful how he presents it.
From: Scott - Louisville (10/24/08)
I am currently working on an Associates Degree hoping to transfer to U of L in 2010. I am a 40 year-old home-owner, parent of two, unemployed, and a veteran. I do not need nor can I afford an additional meal plan or someone to tell me when, where, and/or how to eat. That's what I endured in the Marine Corps. Somewhere in all this I learned to keep food with me and am able to eat anywhere at anytime.
It would take my family's own grocery budget to afford a mandatory meal plan. Is the University prepared for my family to eat at the cafeteria at least once a day? I'm sure we would be a very unwelcome addition to meal time, as my children are just four and five years old.
I whole-heartedly agree with the notion that the University should provide space for different vendors to compete for the student's meal dollars. Open market capitalism can be a wo, nderful concept when it is used to increase choices and/or quality of products/services available to a demographic that is in ever increasing numbers while in the crosshairs of the name brand advertisers begging for their expendable dollars.
From: Alicia - Louisville (10/23/08)
M, aybe U of L needs to force all its students to participate in its meal plan so they can pay for their new brick road entrance on 3rd Street.
From: Paula - Louisville (10/23/08)
I saw your Point of View on raising the driving age of teenagers in Indiana. While I think this is a great idea, I also think the state of Kentucky needs to administer eye tests to people asking to renew their driving privileges. My 86 year-old grandmother has macular degeneration and can not see the TV clearly, but they still gave her a new license for the fee and a new picture. What kind of safety is that?
Who, is more dangerous? An inexperienced teenager that can see or an experienced elder that cannot see?
From: Kip - Louisville (10/23/08)
In regard to U of L's new lunch program: This is so very unjust for the University to not only dictate where the students eat, but to also dictate that they be forced to pay money to the place where they are being forced to eat. I wish someone wou, ld pass laws and rules and regulations forcing people to use only the services that my business provides and then force them to pay me all their money even if they don't use them.
Apparently, I am in the right city. Now, if I just get with the right people (U of L, Jerry Abramson, etc.). Then I am sure they could make it happen for me (for their cut, of course!)
I guess U of L thinks they are the Food Gods now. Thou shalt have no other food before mine!
It looks like the officials at U of L have found a way to become legalized bullies by stealing their students' lunch money! The whole administration should be expelled!
From: Willard - Louisville (10/23/08)
U of L plans to force all students to sign up for their meal plan, including ones living on campus in facilities with kitchens, requiring higher rates even for commuters. I am the grandfather of two students who can hardly find funds to stay in school now. This would mean another $1,000 per semester.
I know what it was like to not have fund, s to attend college and I paid for it all my life. This move by U of L is even on top of a long string of year after year tuition increases.
From: Todd - Pekin, Indiana (10/20/08)
In these, tough economic times, why have they started building the downtown arena? What they sh, ould be spending that money on is the east end bridge that has been needed for over 20 years. That would allow people around here to conserve fuel instead of wasting money on something we, as the taxpayers, won't be able to afford to visit when it is done.
From: Carla - Louisville (10/17/08)
On the evening news you interviewed a lady from the Ford Truck Plant who was visiting a credit counselor because she has been laid off for 17 or 18 weeks since the first of the year. Do you realize she received approximately 85% of her pay to stay home? Considering her savings on gas and wear and tear on her vehicle, she probably made more than if she had worked.
If she needed a credit counselor now, she needed one prior to being laid off. Next time, let's visit with the people who are really in trouble.
From: Gary - Palmyra, Indiana (10/17/08)
I think they should split 700 billion dollars among the people of this country so we can pay off our debt, homes and cars. We're not paying for the taxpayers' mistakes, but for the mistakes of the overpaid CEOs, company presidents and managers. While their pockets are stuffed with millions, hardworking taxpaying Americans are losing everything. It's just not right.
From: Brenda - Louisville (10/16/08)
It's election time again, and politicians are again forgetting what we really need. We all want someone qualified to lead us, but we really need som, eone to protect us from crooks like the mortgage and oil companies. We would all think a lot more of any politician if he or she could grow a backbone and control these legalized thieves.
From: Judi - Borden, Indiana (10/15/08)
I could not agree more with what you had to say about AIG. I think that they should be made to pay back all the multi-millions they have paid themselves. But I also feel that they should have to give back what they have sheltered away in their wives' and children's names to keep it from being taken.
From: Donald - Jeffersonville, Indiana (10/13/08)
Watching the political ads, both candidates are accusing the other of terrible things. If true, neither deserves to represent anyone. If it is not true, then who would want a liar to represent them?
This election will truly be a choice between the lesser of two evils. In the end, the title should not be "Honorable," but "Hypocrite."
From: April - Louisville (10/10/08)
I would like to know why fuel in Frankfort is, on average, 30 cents less per gallon than it is in Louisville.
This so-called "investigation" never fixed anything. If you have a 15 gallon tank, you will pay $5 more per fill-up. If you do just o, ne fill-up per week, that's $20 more a month to live in Louisville, which comes out to $240 per car per year for the same, exact fuel other Kentuckians are using 25 minutes down the road in the next city.
In a family with two cars, that's $500 a year down the drain that other Kentucky families don't have to pay.
I want to know why.
From: Jonathon - Louisville (10/9/08)
It is my point of view that it is a ser, ious miscarriage of your responsibility to provide intelligent, well thought out Point of View segments to push a right-wing agenda by repeatedly labeling mainstream media as "liberal." This pract, ice was pushed to the national stage years ago by Rush and Bill O'Reilly to dupe people into not trusting mainstream news and get the "straight talk" from their propaganda machines.
Bill Lamb, if this is where you stand, just come out and tell us instead of trying to pander to the dittoheads. It cheapens you and it cheapens Fox 41.
From: Ed - Louisville (10/8/08)
I vote for Republicans and Democrats and noticed the Courier-Journal', ;s far-left views many years ago. I cancelled my subscription back then and will not purchase a Courier-Journal again.
From: Bill - Louisville (10/7/08)
I think that it is time for the people of America to take responsibility for their actions, and to require the politicians that we, as voters, put into their positions to be held accountable for their, actions as well.
It is time for a change. But the change has to start from within ourselves. The change cannot and will not happen simply by putting someone in office who claims they can make those changes. Changes cannot and will not be made if the American people do not demand those changes. The economy is going down the drain because all of the American people are doing what the politicians are dictating to us.
This country was founded on unity and morals, not on scandals and lies. America has gone seriously off course because we the people have allowed it to get that way. The American voter has no right to complain, about the jobs that our politicians are doing because we the voters have re-elected those same politicians back into office time and time again.
If you truly believe "it's time for a change," then the change has to start from within.
From: Michelle - Louisville (10/7/08)
It's sad to think that we, as consumers, now have to bail out people that claim to be smart enough to manage the nation's stock market. How much more money is it going to take in a few months to fix what is NOT going to be fixed with this 700 Billion? More than t, hat would have to be put out in order to completely rectify the errors in judgment.
I, for one, am neither willing nor able to afford any more taxes than I already pay. If we bail them out now, we will have to do it again. Better management would have helped this situation in the first place.
From: Christin - Louisville (10/6/08)
I have a fire pit in my backyard. Saturday, the fire department showed up at my house. We were burning wood and, of course, it came from my downed trees.
Why can't I burn my wood? I have a legal fire pit built into the ground with fire bricks about 10 feet deep. I have a water hose and hot dogs. Why is that illegal? I pay my taxes and I want to have a fire in my backyard.
From: Dale - Jeffersonville, Indiana (10/3/08)
Concerning the current financial crisis facing the country and proposed bailout by the federal governmen, t:
I'm an average poor person who cares, and I feel that if an average person could go purchase stock without a broker or a college degree, many would be more than willing to do their part in putting money back in the economy. Plus, they would be stockholders helping to insure their own financial futures, possibly helping with the social crisis the future holds for unprepared retirees so that present payments to social security wont have to be burdened with supporting (insufficiently funded) seniors who didn't (or don't) know how to secure their futures.
Buying stock seems almost impossible without trusting strangers with your money, and most of us have so little. If I could walk into a doughnut shop, buy coffee, doughnuts and five shares of Ford stock, I would probably own a couple hundred or maybe a thousand shares.
I would like to be part of the solution, but not pay off the already-rich and super-rich so that their mistakes are forgiven while we poor people still lose our homes.
From: John - New Albany, Indiana (10/3/08)
I think that the Wall Street bailout is wrong! The companies that are being bailed out are turning huge profits! If they can't make it, then let them fall!
If the government wants to provide $700 billion to "bailout" somebody, bailout the American Citizen - the taxpayer -- by giving each person who filed a tax return a $200,000 credit so they can pay off their own mortgages and credit card debt, reduce bankruptcies, provide food for their families and renew the so-called American Dream by jus, t being able to breathe again.
It's the people of this country that flip the bill every time elected officials in Washington want to protect their own interests and investments -- such as big oil companies -- by using tax money. The majority of those in Congress have stock in big oil. They do not want to see the price come down. It hurts their profits!
The President is a Texas oil man! This Wall Street Bailout is a case of Robin Hood in reverse -- stealing from the poor to give it all to the rich. What has this country come to?
From: Linda - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (10/3/08)
In response to Bill Lambs' bailout comment:
We should not bail out these people! Why should we, when they themselves caused this mess? The American taxpayer is being pushed to the brink already. Anyone with common sense knows it's not going to stop with just one bailout. If, this one is passed, it won't be long before they'll be asking for another. Where will it all end?, Probably with our country becoming a socialist state! How's that for a scare tactic?
From: Nikki - Louisville (10/1/08)
The "Just for Kids" campaign will help more than just a typical parent who may have visited Kosair's ER a time or two. I have a terminal, ly ill child who, not too long ago, was admitted for two weeks and underwent some tests that I had never even imagined were ou, t there.
This hospital and many others need this money to help insure that our children have the best treatment out there. One of the tests they did actually proved that we were not underfeeding my child, but that her body burned too many calories too fast for her to even pick up a pound over a three-year period. Now that the doctors have found the problem, she has gained over 10 pounds in six months.
From: Bill - Lanesville, Indiana (9/30/08)
Let me see if I understand this right. John Yarmuth got $45 million for the new VA hospital and McConnell got $75 million, so they are going to spend this on buying the property, design and site clearing.
Real, ly? There is no wonder we have never gotten a new VA hospital, and at this rate we never will. What happened to the $250 million that Ann Northup got when she was in there? Now they want $700 million more to construct the hospital.
What will they do for money for health care for the veterans? For $700 million, why not just buy Jewish or Norton?
From: Doreen - Gos, hen, Kentucky (9/26/08)<, /P>
LG&E's Fair Share of Storm Cost equals $18,000,000. LG&E is a German owned, for-profit corporation -- not a non-profit community service or co-op. LG&E should carry the same lost revenue other local businesses suffered from the storm.
Businesses closed for five days a year (1.3% of available days) cannot recover their losses, and 1.3% of LG&E's $1.4 billion annual revenue equals $18 million.
After that, let's talk expenses charged to customers. We don't own this company or share in any profits. We're not LG&E's deep pocket, an, d the Kentucky Public Service Commission should not set us up to be so.
From: Matt - Memphis, Indiana (9/26/08)
Isn't it wrong to let one company get so big that if it fails it takes the entire economy with it? As such, this bailout is not going to help fix the problem.
An economic reset is what America needs -- back to a point where housing was affordable and you didn't need to make extraordinarily large amounts of money to own a home. Greed - both corporate and personal - is what has placed the economy in such a mess. The bailout will only put off what is happening.
The economy will fall again -- maybe at a faster rate than during the time of the Great Depression.
From: Tanya - Louisville (9/25/08)
I agree we need better specialists in our area. I have to travel to Nashville to get my daughter's hand care because no one here has the knowledge or equipment needed. So this initiative by Norton Healthcare to benefit Kosair Children's Hospital is a great start to better healthcare in the Louisville area.
From: Charles - Louisville (9/25/08)
One of the largest costs in building the East End Bridge will be to tunnel under the home near US 42. Has anyone looked into just moving this home?
They can move bridges, large homes and even lighthouses -- why not just move this home and get on with it?
A tunnel woul, d prob, ably either flood, or -- like the Chunnel between Britain and France -- have a major fire as the result of an accident.
On the flip side, I guess it would save on snow re, moval.
From: Denise - Louisville (9/25/08)
I have a answer to the buy out that I think should be considered. No buy out, BUT -- give every tax paying American -- and every legal American drawing welfare -- one million dollars. The stipulation being: you have to use it to pay off your home. If you don't have a home, you must buy or build one, with a $250,000 limit. This would save people from possible tax trouble later.
Then, spend any way you like.
This would pull the banks out of trouble. They would have there money back, the housing market and the economy would be boosted, and we could get rid of welfare all at the same time!
It would save the taxpayers billions, and I'll bet for once they would be happy to , pay taxes! I would!
From: Valarie - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (9/25/08)
The Kentucky legislature passed a 50% pay raise for Legislative Research Commission Director Bobby Sherman. 50% seems very extreme, considering the condition of this state's economy -- as well as the nation's. I have already written an email to my county's senator and , have advised him I will try and get others to do the same.
From: Fredlyn - Louisville (9/24/08)
I agree with Bill Lamb 100% concerning the citizens of Louisville who have done nothing but complain about having no electricity. If all they have lost is power and food, they should consider themselves blessed!
Did any of them follow an LG&E power crew or a power contractor crew around for just one day to see exactly what they had to do in order to restore power? I think NOT! Until you walk in those shoes, keep your mouths shut!
People hav, e lost their homes and everything they own, and most importantly, some have lost loved ones! In my daughter's words, who is in Texas with no power and having to sleep away from her 5- and 9-year old children: "Be thankful you have a house where power can be turned on!"
I am appalled someone would complain their trash was not picked up for one day. Are you serious?
On a brighter side, I commend, applaud and thank the people who fed and showed their appreciation to the power workers. Now that is Louisville's true hospitality and, generosity!
I am proud to call Louisville my home. Thank you for giving me this opportunity to voice my feelings and opinions.
From: Troy - Mount Washington, Kentucky (9/24/08)
I happened to catch a replay of the news on September 23 and saw a comment from a woman wondering why her neighborhood was the last to get power back on. The truth is, someone had to be last and I am sure her area was being repaired as soon as possible.
I am so tired of seeing people complain about issues like power outages and how the local government needs to have meetings on what could have been done better. Enough of our tax dollars were spent to get power back on and now we should spend more to talk about a weather related power outage?
From: John - Salem, Indiana (9/23/08)
It is Tuesday evening and my wife and I were discussing the response to the once-in-a-lifetime (hop, efully) windstorm. We generally agree that first responders and utility workers did an admirable job. Our disappointment is with the coverage by area media outlets. As far as I know, only one Louisville area station broke into regular programming to, tell us what was going on. I'm not sure that Fox41 even had reporters available at the time.
Most disturbing to my wife was the almost total lack of coverage for Salem and Washington County in Indiana. It seems that no reporter dared travel any further than the Louisville Metro Area, although this area had large power outages and damage also. It would have been nice to be informed about what was going on and where help could be found. Perhaps next time (heaven forbid) our area will be better informed too.
I am also dismayed at the lack of coverage by the national media. You would think that a storm of such magnitude would be newsworthy -- especially , when over 350,000 people lost power and extensive damage was done.
From: James - Crestwood, Kentucky (9/23/08)
I completely agree with your comments about the actions of LG&E to get the power back on in our communities. It is completely necessary to approach such activity with assigned priority so that the largest number of properties is benefited the earliest. Those who are complaining are apparently taking the attitude of "as long as I am first." The approach taken by LG&E was without any preference to any section of town or personal preferences. Thank you for your objective approach to this subject.
From: David - Louisville (9/22/08)
During the recent windstorm, about seven poles were broken in front of my house. They came out Tuesday to fix them. They brought everything needed and had dug the holes and everything. Then, they just left. Still no power.
I later was told by another crew and several police officers that the Mayor's office told the crew to stop what they were doing here and make the east end and the Ryder Cup a priority. They couldn't get back until Sunday. Sun they fixed everything, but the five days extra was cruel and unnecessary.
My beef isn't how long it took. I understand that. But they were here Tuesday and should have been allowed to finish here then.
Our mayor has lost touch with those of us who don't live in the city itself, and its time to boot him out next term. I'm not whining about the time it took, but just that I didn't seem to matter as much as the Ryder Cup. I live here. The tourists don't!
I want to also thank all the crews who were out restoring power. They really busted their butts.
From: Gary - Louisville (9/22/08)
In light of the recent wind damage Louisville received, I would like to comment on the areas that w, ere open to receive tree debris.
I had to report to work on a daily basis and was not able to tackle the downed 60' elm tree until the weekend following the storm. I do not get off work until 5:00pm, and the sites closed at 6:00pm. This only gave me Saturday and Sunday to get the tree down, cut it up and haul it to the site.
Needless to say I did not get the job completed and the sites close this Monday. I need at least one more weekend to complete my clean up but now I have no place to haul the debris. I understand that the sites were open for an entire week, but the general public that wor, ks during the week really did not get to utilize them to the fullest.
Why couldn't the sites be open for two weeks Friday thru Monday? This would have been the same amount of days, and I believe the general public would have been able to utilize this time better.
I wouldn't expect our Mayor for life to do anything that would make sense to the general public since he is not part of this lower everyday working class.
From: Chrystal - Sarasota, Florida (9/22/08)
I am writing this be, cause I am really upset to hear from people in Kentucky how some people are getting help while others aren't. They lost power for what a week and had to throw all their food away. But the ones that get food stamps are being issued new food stamps, while those who don't get food stamps get no help! What is wrong with this world?
My friend up there and a few others are scraping by to make ends meet, but while they make just a little too much to get food stamps, they don't get help. This is disgusting -- not right at all.
I think if anyone gets help, everyone who asks for help should get it -- at least a little to get back on their feet. It is bad enough they had to go through the hurricane effects, but it is not fair to the ones who are classified as middle class. I guess they're supposed to starve to make ends meet, huh?
Their home insurance includes a $250 deductible and they only get $150 back for food. They're losing big time. What help is that, either?
This makes no sense to me.
From: Patricia - Louisville (9/22/08)
I would like to say a word about the windstorm. I think it was good for the state to put money back on the food stamp cards for the people who get them, but what about the ones who don't get food stamps -- the people who have to live pay check to pay check? They don't make enough to get by but make too much to get food stamps.
We lost all our food. We buy to last a month. Now, we have to start over again and we have to make a choice: buy food or meds. Some, how, I don't think that seems quite fair.
It shows that Kentucky does help, but only for select groups of people. What's up with that? Way to go, Kentucky.
From: Brian - Louisville (9/20/08)<, /P>
I am writing in regard to the amount of media coverage that Mr. Obama has been receiving in contrast to the coverage offered to Mr. McCain. I am concerned that the media is going to give us a president that is a true politician (concerned for his own well-being over the matters that make us a great country).
The other , candidate, Mr. McCain, has proven himself over and ove, r again -- sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. Yet he does put (obviously) our country first.
I think it would be a travesty to allow a politician (and lawyer for a slum lord, among other things -- such as forgetting to say the pledge of allegiance to the country he wants to run) to have the opportunity to right what is wrong with this country. Of course we are all sick and tired of candidates bashing each other. This reminds me of attitudes of adolescents in a school yard.
Not only has Mr. McCain spent over five years as a P.O.W., he has always been proud to fly his colors, unlike Mr. Obama who "doesn't want to fall into the fad." As a Marine veteran, I wholeheartedly hope the American people take this into consideration.
Of, course, they could vote the man in that wants to raise the taxes on the wealthy. Do they not realize that the wealthy will still be wealthy? They will just pass the increase onto the consumers -- you and me.
From: Sophia (9/19/08)
I would like to know where the pastors were during the blackout. I didn't hear of any pastors opening the "Doors of the Church" when the storm hit.
We pay our tithes, for pastor anniversaries, church anniversaries and so on, and then they -- the pastors -- seemed to have hidden in the dark.
Well, if we Christians and churchgoers stop paying the pastor's salary, maybe they will serve the membership better.
From: Kelly - Louisville (9/19/08)
I don't think LG&E customers should have to pay for the work that was done to get everyone back up with power because it was an act of Mother Nature that tore the lines and took out power. People often have problems getting insurance to pay for damage of personal property because of the situation was caused by an act of Mother Nature, so we shouldn't have to pay extra on our LG&E bill for the same reason.
From: Robert - Louisville (9/19/08)
Usually, I agree with the Point of View, but this time Bill Lamb was off-base. While I agree that the Ryder Cup is a great event for the city of Louisville and it will bring in millions of dollars to the community, you seem to forget all the local residents who, day in and day out, pump millions of dollars into the local economy. Some, for all their lives.
Look v, ery closely at cities like New Orleans, and maybe Galveston and Houston. How many of those residents are going to say enough is enough and leave those cities? I, for one, have had four power outages over the past three years that have lasted three days or more. How long will it be before the business owners, have had enough and move elsewhere? How many businesses refuse to move to Louisville and Kentucky because of the problems with the infrastructure, and especially because of the poor ratings most schools receive when compared to the rest of the nation?
I wouldn't move a business here. I'm sure others think similarly. That's the real tax revenue -- not the Ryder Cup or any other special events.
From: Jerry - Louisville (9/18/08)
I am a local semi truck driver. I run throughout the entire city. Today, I noticed several people on cell phones not even attempting to slow down for traffic lights that were out. In two different areas, there were even National Guard troops directing traffic.
This is disgusting behavior to me. These guards and our own police are trying to keep us all safe, and a few idiots on cell phones could possibly kill them.
From: Jenniffer - Louisville (9/18/08)
Maybe the Ryder Cup is not the problem, but no one is stepping up to help. Maybe we should be treated a little more like the New Orleans people. Our own mayor welcomed them with open arms. They were given a roof over their head with breakfast, lunch, dinner, lights, air conditioning and "field trips," and to top it off a $500 Visa gift card.
I know much of this was provided by FEMA, but a lot of money and hospitality came out of the city's budget. Now I do not see the mayor opening his arms up to his own citizens.
We are the ones who pay taxes everyday to this city for it to be a great place for the Ryder Cup. I know LG&E is working as hard as it can, but it is going on day six and there is no help from anyone. Dare to Care is open, but it only cares about the people in the west and southwest ends of town. The people in the east end do not have to eat, so it seems.
The mayors of the Southern Indiana area sure knows how to treat their people. High schools across the areas affected are providing shelter, water, ice and hot meals daily. That would be too much to ask from our mayor. His priority is not his people.
People of this city would be much more understanding and patient if they were treated differently.
From: Mike - Louisville (9/18/08)
Hey Bill, most of the time you're correct with your opinions but this time you are way off-base. Many of us that are golf fans couldn't care less about the Ryder Cup this year.
My uncle is sitting in a dark house in the Portland Neighborhood throwing out food and praying LG&E gets to him soon.
Just because you can handle the heat and darkness doesn't mean you shouldn't take a minute to think of the sick and elderly that are struggling. The poor will not see one dime the Ryder Cup ge, nerates, so I hope they hurry up and, ride their butts out of town.
Michael - Louisville (9/18/08)
I just watched your editorial where you agreed that city officials had an obligation to be sure the golf tournament went off without a hitch. I tend to agree with that point, although I do think it is relatively unimportant in the overall scheme of things.
Do you also agree that Lake Forest residents should have gotten preference to have their power restored? I knew that Valhalla didn't lose power, but I've heard from several people that Lake Forest had power back by Monday afternoon. The reason? Many of the wealthy residents had rented their homes to other wealthy people for $50,000 - $100,000 for the week. The city didn't want big shots like Michael Jordan coming town only to find that his rented property didn't have power.
I don't know if this is true, but if it is, do you also support that? Seems to me like the people who rented their homes ought to rebate part of their tax free (yes, tax free) windfall to people who are hurting because of this disaster. What do you think?
From: Shelley - Louisville (9/18/08)
The government officials of Louisville open the city to the unfortunate from New Orleans when they have a hurricane, but don't offer their own the same sympathy. We are still without power, we have no way to cook or store food so we have to either eat fast food or pick up something small at a grocery. But we have to eat it all or it is wasted. With the price of gas and the price of food this is just not fair. Where is our help?
From: Chase - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (9/17/08)
How do Bullitt County Schools expect to open? Half of us still don't have electricity. Yeah, maybe the schools do, but what about the people that haven't all week? They haven't been able to take , showers, eat or even have an alarm to wake them up.
Keith Davis is an idiot if he opens. He doesn't care about us as long as he gets paid. And he calls himself a superintendent.
From: Terrie - Louisville (9/17/08)
I am really upset that everyone is so worried about the people getting food stamps and getting their cards reimbursed. What about those of us that work for a living and are on a budget that spent our last little bit on groceries? Who the hell is going to reimburse us? Or do we just have to suffer while the government keeps helping those that don't want to help themselves?
Give me a break. Everyone has suffered. How can they reimburse some and not others?
From: Bill - Louisville (9/16/08)
In regard to your , editori, al about the care of trees planted on public streets:
Did you know that per local ordinances and state laws, property owners are responsible to maintain to the center-of-road rights-of-way? This means any newly planted trees are the property owners' responsibility, and these property owners generally have to agree to this before trees are planted.
From: Sue - Shively, Kentucky (9/15/08)
I would like to know why there is no free ice for people who are without power. Why didn't the governor give out free ice like most disaster areas have done in the past? It is hard to keep families going with food when they are already having hard times with not being able to find ice without riding around town to found someone who has any. Plus, with gas stations hard to find open, this is a strain on a lot of people. I hope to hear something about this matter in a timely matter.
From: Barbara - Clarksville, Indiana (9/15/08)
Any idea where the Governor of Indiana is? I see where Kentucky Governor Beshear is right there in Louisville helping get things done (following the storm). Again I ask, where is our governor over here in Indiana? It would be nice if he showed up. After all, it's an election year, and some of us have long memories.
From: Bobbie - Louisville (9/15/08)
It seems like the city of Louisville opened its doors for the evacuees, which is a wonderful thing. However, why has the city not opened the Fairgrounds for those of us that live in the city -- especially when thousands of city residents are without power?
"Help home first" is what shou, ld count. How many times have they opened up the Fairgrounds to OUR OWN residents? Seems to me that the city was just trying to get a little clout just to make it seem like we have a friendly helpful community.
Open the fairgrounds to all the residents that do not have power and give them free food and a few free field trips. I'm sure there are a lot of people in the city that would love to go on free field trips sponsored by the city.
Are there any businesses giving away free food to any residents that could only afford the food they had in the fridge? Where is our "wonderful" community service help now from the city?
From: Larson - Louisville (9/13/08)
Mr. Lamb:
Yo, u continue to restore my faith in society one minute at a time. Thank you for having common sense, and not being ashamed of it. It's such a nice change of pace from the gold-covered poop storm that we call "the media." Thank you again for telling truths and addressing real problems. I can only wish there were politicians who shared you penchant for accountability a, nd reason.
From: Terri - Elizabeth Indiana (9/6/08)
I think that if nobody wants us to smoke, then what they need to do is quit making cigarettes. We have already, hurt tobacco farmers, so they've gone on to different crops.
Quit wasting t, ime and taxpayer money by coming up with these stupid smoking bans. If someone doesn't smoke and they don't want to be around it, maybe they should go somewhere that smoking isn't allowed.
There are many places in New Albany that are smoke free. Go, Mayor England.
From: Greg - Mount Washington, Kentucky (9/4/08)
Regarding the smoking ban in New Albany:
I applaud the Mayor's veto decision. Let business owners and their patrons choose what's right for their esta, blishments. Every time a new law is passed, we los, e a piece of our freedom.
From: Kelly - New Albany, Indiana (9/4/08)
Ban smoking, ban trans-fats, ban gay rights, ban driving your car on Derby Eve, and when you Nazis are done banning Americ, ans' God-given rights, fly your swastikas high and take aim at the rest of the Constitution and what's left of our free will and freedoms.
From: Paula - Louisville (9/3/08)
I saw Julie Tam's piece on riding a bus to Butler or Male, and how far kids would have to travel.
My daughter attends this year and even though we live 10 minutes away, she would have to get on a bus at 6:05 am and transfer at one, and possibly two, depots. We were told that it is unsafe to drive a child to the bus stop -- which we were doing -- yet two children today were beaten and robbed walking to a bus stop.
I think there needs to be some changes on the busing situation. Children can be picked up over the ten miles from their home at a decent time in the morning, but they will not make decent arrangements for those who live within a reasonable distance.
From: Tish - Louisville (9/3/08)
I would like to know who is paying for the people evacuated from the hurricane to get eye examinations and eyeglasses when there are people in this area who can't get them even , though they, too, need but can't afford them.
I think this is going a little too far. The to, urs are great, but eyeglasses? No way.
From: Teresa - Louisville (9/2/08)
I usually agree that Louisville is generous and I am happy that we helped people that needed shelter. However I have to stop short of using the term "Compassion City." My son was diagnosed with canc, er in 2006 and back then I tried to get help from my community. My pleas fell on deaf ears. I called everywhere -- even a news station (not this one) -- and begged them to do a story on my son so I could get some help, . I went on Internet sites and asked for help with trying to set up a fundraiser. I did everything that I could think of to get help. I had other people asking for help as well. It didn't do any good.
In February of this year my son relapsed and after surgery we thought he was again cancer free. We were wrong. We found out last week the cancer is back for a third time. I am on disability with a limited income and I need help with things like keeping gas in my vehicle so I can get him to the hospital and doctors.
I never thought that in this community that my pleas would fall on deaf ears because I see stories on TV about people that need help and this community comes out in droves to support those in need. Their stories were covered on every news channel and believe me, my story is no different.
Today my son had an appointment with his doctors and we didn't get there because our vehicle broke down. Do you know how I feel because I could not get him there?
Please don't call this "Compassion City" for everyone, because it has not been "compassionate" towards us.
From: Rick - Madison, Indiana (8/31/08)
I saw where Baron Hill was going to be on Fox in the Morning. This seems to mark his election year cycle of visibility in , the 9th District.
Lee Hamilton used to have town hall meetings about every six months throughout the district, but Baron uses them during the election cycle. I understand that he has ducked Mike Sorrel's challenge to debate or have joint town hall meetings in all 20 counties of the 9th District, with the excuse being that his current town hall meetings have already been scheduled.
It seems Baron's a "blue dog Democrat" just as long as he's not asked about his bona fides. Also, you should ask him about his policy that constituents cannot video or audio tape his public meetings. That's actually a written policy!
So much for the legacy of Lee Hamilton.
From: Ronita - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (08-28-08)
Regarding Mr. Lamb's recent "Point of View" about Brooks Elementary School:
I agree that parents should make sure that their children attend school because it is the right thing to do. However, parents abdicate their responsibilities, and the wheels of justice grind slowly to force the parents to comply with the law. Schools must, therefore, seek , creative ways to keep the children in school long enough to teach them the importance of education.
Likewise, adults should work hard because it is the right thing to do; however, most employers have found that their employees' productivity improves when they are offered incentives such as bonuses, vacations, profit-sharing, etc. Is it wrong or detrimental to society for them to do so? Will Mr. Lamb condemn his empl, oyer if he should be offered a bonus? I dare say he will cash that, check!
Brooks is to be commended for applying a real-life adult solution to school children, many of whom must serve in lieu of their parents to raise themselves. Mr. Lamb is correct, educators are charged with preparing our children for the adult world. How better to do this than to graphically illustrate the adult principle of reward for a job well done?
From: Jennifer - Brooks, Kentucky (8/27/08)
Have you never been rewarded for anything you have accomplished? Speaking as a parent of two students at Brooks Elementary, I believe you have no clue what goes on at that school and unless you are there every day, as I am, you should be more careful how you choose your words.
There are some families at our school who work two and three jobs just to make ends meet or don't have enough food for dinner the night before. You try waking up f, or school after that.
I went to school in Jefferson County and was also rewarded for perfect attendance. I also worked for an employer who gave bonuses to employees who did not miss any days of work for a certain amount of time. How is that any different? Not to mention the fact that these are children not adults.
Have you ever rewarded your children for setting a goal and meeting it? Is that bribery?
From: Bar, ry - Bedford, Indiana (8/26/08)
I just saw Bill Lamb's comments concerning school attendance. As a retired teacher, I, agree 100%. As a high school math teacher, I had a senior who had to pass my class to graduate. On the day of review for final exams, his dad took him to the Time Trials in Indy. The parents knew he was on the bubble, but chose to take him anyway.
He failed by a few, points and did not graduate. Of course it was my fault he failed. The mother yelled and screamed at me. It did not change his grade.
From: Jeffrey - Louisville (8/25/08)
I am writing about an extreme injustice that the city and school board are doing to the tax paying persons of Louisville.
We are given the right to due process in all matters concerning monetary spending of our taxpayers fund. So I ca, ll upon all tax paying people of Louisville to create a class action lawsuit against all school board and Metro Council members to show us the names of the individuals that said "yes" to all these laws recently passed (i.e. the smoking ban, Greenway around Louisville (what a waste of money), etc.).
If you want to save money, how about sub-contracting out Operation Brightside duties and landscaping for the JCPS? The money saved would be tremendous. This would also help the state on the retirement shortfall.
I live in St. Matthews but I have to pay for garbage collection, fire protection and police. I am unable to use the Metro services. Where is the justice?
NO MORE TAXES unless you can prove - in writing - that you have the majority of the people behind these increases.
From, : Thomas - Louisville (8/25/08)
Just wanted to thank Mr. Lamb for his , comments on the ongoing Wayside Christian Mission situation in the Original Highlands. I myself am a resident of the area, and would like to commend Mr. Lamb for looking at the situation from the residents' perspective. It perfectly summed up my position towards Wayside and the general consensus I have gotten from other residents of the Original Highlands.
I sincerely hope that the mayor and other elected officials can step in and help with the situation, and all involved can focus on finding Wayside a permanent home where they can expand and grow all their programs as needed, such as Home for the Innocents did a few years ago.
Again, thanks to Mr. Lamb for speaking on this issue, and letting the viewers know that the residents are not against homeless shelters, and not NIMBY, but are against the immediate addition of 300 or 400 new residents in our area.
From: Bill - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (8/20/08)
Regarding the broadcast story "Road rage shooting victim's past uncovered," it looks very much like you are trying to blame the victim. I think the facts speak for themselves.
Yolanda Parrish is trigger-happy and deserves prison time, and her 15 year-old son deserves punishment as well. I hope they both get it.
From: Darlene - Louisville (8/20/08)
I agree going back to school in ea, rly August should be great for education, but it only makes up for all the time they take off throughout the year now. We never got out of school for things such as Oaks Day.
The extra time in August should be just that -- extra time so the school day could schedule more time for recess and lunch, and the curriculum time would not be so rushed.
Some schools in Shelby County plan to do away with recess, and the small amount of time for lunch in the Louisville schools barely allows time for the children to cram their food, much less have a little down time in the middle of the day.
This extra time is like extra money that we give schools. It never seems to be used effectively for education, just wasted in a different place.
From: Diane - Louisville (8/19/08)
I am so glad to hear your Point of View regarding education! Children are losing so much early education during the two to two-and-one-half months of summer vacation! The time children learn the fastest and most is during the ages of between three and six years old, and we treat education like it is secondary to having fun.
If we made as much of a commitment toward education as we do toward sports, our children would not be having such a problem. Also, I believe children would no longer "hate" school. Tha, t attitude has come from their parents, not their peers. All the children at kindergarten age love school and miss it during summer vacation.
There wasn't a part of your Point of View that I did not agree with. Thanks so much!
From: Beau - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (8/19/08)
I am a 23-year old that believes the drinking age should remain at 21. But I also think it is unfair that our soldiers serve our country and fight for freedoms that they don't all even have!
A lot of soldiers are under 21 and legally cannot go to a bar when they come home for leave. I believe if they have a military ID, they should be exempt from the age 21 law.
From: Brenda - Louisville (8/19/08)
Not all learning about life is done in the classroom. Sometimes a child may need to look up in, to the clear blue sky with white clouds and discover what they cannot learn in a book. Two , months is not enough to learn to be free in childhood. Children do not need to be put on the fast track so early. Let us give a child time to grow up and decide for themselves.
Bill, it sounds as though you may be using the school system as a babysitter.
From: Ed - Louisville (8/15/08)
In regards to the school summer break, I agree that the current two month break is long enough. However, I disagree with the scheduling of the Kentucky State Fair and the return to school. I think it could be coordinated so that school either starts after the Fair or the Fair starts two weeks earlier.
I remember that as a child, the State Fair was the milestone for the end of summer break. I also remember attending it almost daily with my parents and enjoying it. It should be an enjoyable event for the whole family.
Now I have children, ye, t I find it very difficult to take them in the afternoon after they get home from school and still return home in reasonable time to prepare for the next day of school. Therefore, it's either miss school or mis, s the fair.
I choose to miss the Fair.
From: Mishelle - Corydon, Indiana (8/13/08)
I don't ride a bike or even own one, but I do not believe that it is fair to make people license or register their bicycles. For some people this is their only means of transportation, and to make them pay to ride a bike is downright silly. People cannot afford insurance and gas for their cars, let alone paying to get a license and reg, istration for a bike.
Making bicyclists ride in the street was a dumb idea to begin with. Look how many fatal accidents there have been because of this. It not only jeopardizes the motorist but th, e bicyclist also.
You have never heard of a fatality between a pedestrian and a bicyclist, have you? If so, it's very rare. I have been down a few Downtown Louisville streets and there just isn't enough room for everyone to ride safely.
If you want to make everyone safe, then let them ride on the sidewalk and save someone's life. I think this is just another way of making money off the poor people.
But that's just my opinion, and you know what they say about those.
<, P>
From: Nancy - Goshen, Kentucky (8/9/08)
In reference to Bill Lamb's "A License to Bike?" editorial of August 8th:
Let's take it a step further and use the license monies for creating and maintaining bike lanes. We share the roads, we share the costs.
From: Mary - Louisville (8/8/08)
I agree riders need to follow the rules of the road just like cars. This is a must for safety. Wednesday I witnessed a bike rider on Dixie Highway run two red lights. I guess he thought the lights didn't apply to him! I wonder how many more he didn't stop for.
From: Cynthia - Clarksville (8/8/08)
Most people that ride bikes can not afford to pay for a license and tags. Some are not allowed to drive cars for legal or medical reasons and need to get to a low-paying job.
If you are going to license and tag anything new it should be mopeds and scooters. Leave the bicycles to children and the poor.
From: Mark - Louisville (8/7/08)
I have ridden my bike for years and also owned a vehicle. When I haven't had a vehicle to drive, I hav, e ridden a bike. It is totally uncalled for us to register our pedal-driven bicycles. It is just another form of control, and another way to make money off the poor. You should actually pay us!
I hope people will fight this suggestion. People ride bikes because of very high rates of automobile insurance, or because they cannot afford a vehicle in the first place.
Your point of view is wrong.
P.S. Ever felt what it is like to pedal in the heat, soaking wet with sweat? And by the way, I have had full cans of soda thrown at me, which could be lethal. Not to mention many other things.
From: Raymond - Brandenburg, Kentucky (8/7/08)
I agree that bicycles should be required to be licensed and registered. I also believe that there should be a tax on them just like cars. We pay road taxes so we can have safe roads and bicycles just add to the roads being unsafe.
Not to mention, where is their insurance if they hit someone else's car?
From: Valery - Louisville (8/6/08)
I think LG&E is out of line with this price increase they want to make us pay. They need to use what this earth gives us by using windmills and other ideas.
Look at other states and cities like San Francisco. When I lived there, my PG&E bill wasn't over 20 dollars a month.
It's times like this I wish I was back there. They aren't there to stick it to the residents.
From: Paul - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (8/6/08)
Your news article on the anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb stated that it was a "sad" anniversary. Sorry, but it was sad that the Japanese forced us to use the bomb. It was sad that we lost so many men in the Pacific theater.
It was a blessing that the bomb saved potentially a million li, ves that would have been lost while the Japanese defended their homeland.
I'm sorry you got it wrong. Today is a great day to celebrate the final end to WWII.
From: Joe - Louisville (8/5/08)
I agree that the negative political ads have gotten out of hand. Candidates need to point out their own positive view points instead of being negative about their opponents. We need to hear the truth about what each candidate will do for us and our state.
From: Bill - Louisvill, e (8/5/08)
I agree with Bill Lamb's comments on tonight's news. The negative campaign ads are an insult to my intelligence and a turnoff. No wonder voter turnout is very low. All we get is negative ads and nothing informing us of the qualificatio, ns of the candidates or their accomplishments.
From: Charlie - Louisville (8/5/08)
Your comments on negative political advertising should be repeated three times a day, for however long it takes for our slime-laden pols to get the message.
From: Joseph - Louisville (8/5/08)
I watched with interest your story about the widening of KY 22. I'd like to know why no one asks the hard question:
Why is it when a developer creates a neighborhood or a shopping center, they don't have to provide funds to widen the road? Why should the Highway Department pay for the work? The new development doesn't create more money for the Transportation Cabinet!
Also, why is it the developers can build a development and then be allowed to make the government pay for the right of way? If they want the road wider, they should pay and provide the land for the road they want.
Why not report on that?
From: Randall - Corydon, Indiana (8/1/08)
Exxon announced 11 billion in profit? Why are they not prosecuted for price gouging?
I just don't get it.
From: Charles - Louisville (8/1/08)
At a time when our city should be thankful for any business or convention that comes to town, SOME of us sure don't show it. The hot rod show is in town, with its members spending a lot of money here. And how do SOME businesses thank them? By jumping gas prices 20-30 cents a gallon when both oil and gas commodities are going down in price.
Not a good way to say "thanks and come again!"
From: Gregory - Clarksville, Indiana (7/29/08)
I saw your editorial about the teachers union today and agree with you. But a bigger problem in our community involves what the woman had to say about the hit and run murderer (her son) who killed the two young girls recently. She pu, blicly stated that "He is not a bad kid."
His history is now well-known, and I am just wondering what, exactly, she thinks it takes to be a bad kid. Furthermore, when is a twenty-six year old considered to, be a kid?
Her statements are equal to saying "Charles Manson is not a bad guy, Charlie just gets a wild hair every now and then." To know we live among people who make sorry excuses for pathetic behavior is a real eye-opener. What are we supposed to do when this is thrown right in our faces?
From: Charles - Louisville (7/29/08)
I would like to thank Bruce Lunsford for the automatic gas tax increase. Without the extra dollars this tax produces, we might not have crossover barriers on our dangerous expressways saving lives ever day.
I am not a Bruce Lunsford man, but I sure get tired of all the mudslinging going on. It is enough to make me think twice about voting at all. Throw mud and it might come back to splatter on you.
Can't anyone just state what they have done well while in office or what they will try to do if elected? We all know what goes on, and we need to make up our minds based on their records.
Again, thanks Bruce for road improvements and safety improvements. A few cents more on the price of gas is better than our current do-nothing officials causing the price of gas to wreck our economy.
From: Shon - Louisville (7/26/08)
Concerning the "Baggy Pants"" issue: There is already a law concerning indecent exposure so let's enforce it. Another way the city could raise funds is by tick, eting these individuals.
Sagging pants with underwear and rear end showing is a public health issue. How would you like to get on a bus or enter a restaurant and sit in a seat where bare underwear has been? This is not a "style of dress." It's lawlessness. It's a way of saying "I dare you to do something about my lazy -- as well as unhealthy -- behavior!
Law enforcement is there to enforce the law. If excuses keep being made for this type of negative behavior, what'll be next? Genitals hanging out?
From: Raymond - Louisville (7/25/08)
Regarding the recent outbreak of contaminated food:
Has anyone considered the filthy hands that feel up the fruit and vegetables in markets? How about the bathroom habits of workers in the fields?
It's a wonder we don't have Typhoid Marys all over.
From: Bill - Louisville (7/25/08)
On 7/23/08, your news team reported that an additional $130 million dollars would be spent to preserve property and a house that stand in the way of a new highway. What needs to be considered is what the future costs of maintaining that tunnel will be vs. an ab, oveground highway. Has it been considered that tremors have recently hit the Kentuckiana area? What about the water tables?
So the wealthy people win again and everyone else has to pay for it. What happened to "what's best for the people?"
From: Deborah - Pendleton, Kentucky (7/25/08)
I am all for preservation, but sadly, I have seen many pastoral settings and historic buildings demolished in the name of progress.
However, I am curious how many other private homes (or public buildings) have been designed by the same architects as the historic estate being saved from de, molition in the path of the "East End" bridge approach? How many of these buildings are left standing? If there aren't any other examples of this firm's buildings left, why weren't those other buildings saved? Why weren't they deemed valuable? If there are other buildings in existence from the same firm that aren't in the way of progress, then , celebrate their qualities.
Those who have been in the path of public projects know well that you are not given much of a chance to save your beloved home unless you can financially afford a legal campaign, either personally or with the backing of an organization such as River Fields.
Most private homes are demolished without any recourse except to attend exhaustive public hearings. If this property is so valuable to the homeowner and the historic preservationists, they may wish to offer to finance the tunnels privately. There really is no shortage of mansions. There is a shortage of government funding for roadway construction.
From: Tracy - Louisville (7/25/08)
My comment on the motorcycle shooting incident is that is wasn't worried about the woman who did th, e shooting until I heard that she had pulled a gun on a previous occasion. I am concerned about her son, who learned from this incident that it's OK to shoot first and ask questions later. What does this teach our children who are already exposed to enough of this?
I pray the man who was shot gets through this OK.
From: Gary - Elizabethto, wn, Kent, ucky (7/24/08)
Regarding the Point of View by Bill Lamb on Thursday night's news about the motorcyclist being shot:
I think only an idiot would say what he said. I wasn't there and he wasn't either. I'm a motorcyclist who gave up my Harley last year after seven years and 69,000 miles of riding. I was rear-ended by a 16-year old at a light and run off the road several times by cars. Or they just pulled out in front of me even while looking at me.
Any time a motorcyclist deals with a car, he loses. My question would have been, "Would she have shot a black motorcycli, st if he'd walked back to talk to her?" If I had been that motorcyclist, I would have pulled off the road and called the police after getting her license number. But as I said, I wasn't there.
From: Al - Louisville (7/24/08)
Yes dump RFG! How many vehicles traverse Louisville that do not use RFG? What percentage do they contribute to the supposed problem? Many Indiana residents daily drive to and from Louisville. Indiana residents do not use RFG. For years, when possible, I purchased gas in Indiana because it cost less.
My concern is, are Louisville vehicles the major contributor to the pollution problem? What about Rohm and Haas, the plants in Rubbertown, etc.? Can't we resolve this problem without putting it on the backs of hardworking Louisvillians?
From: Joann - Louisville (7/23/08)
Oh dear Lord! OK, we are going to spend millions to save one house built in the 1920s -- going to spend millions to build a tunnel to a bridge that should divert traffic from downtown.
Does anyon, e realize that all semi-tractor trailers that have hazardous material loads can not go through that tunnel? Why didn't someone consider just making a curve that would spare the property if it is that important? What happened to common sense?
From: David - Louisville (7/21/08)
I have a question for white women only. Let me preface it by saying that I am a 6'3" 205 pound blac, k man.
If I got out of my car or off my motorcycle in traffic and approached you without provocation, would you be at least worried, concerned, and at worst fearful and defensive about my walking to your car?
But throw into the mix an actual provo, cation. Say my confrontation is a reaction to an ugly, mean-spirited dispute we just had. Now, would it, be safe to say you would be downright scared for your life, and scrambling for protection by dialing 911 and or looking for a weapon to protect yourself?
If you are sincere, the answer is overwhelmingly "yes." I ask this question to white women only because this issue is about race. Again, if you are sincere, you would agree that if that India, na woman had been white, and the man who approached her car after an argument had been black, the man would be on trial, not the woman.
Finally, I ask this question because we as a community n, eed to be honest. We are setting an ugly precedent. Do you really mean to tell me that you and I can argue, and if I choose to continue it by approaching or following you, you must ignore good judgment and common sense and take a chance with your life by tolerating my harassment?
From: Ken - Louisville (7/18/08)
Mr. Lamb was on target when he said we need to open our oil fields. High energy prices are a case of supply and demand. This will increase the supply. Just having President Bush hint at an increase in supply by asking for drilling in Alaska and offshore has resulted in the price of a barrel of oil dropping over $10.
From: Rob - New Albany, Indiana (7/18/08)
I watched your "Point of View" regarding drilling oil fields located on our west coast and Alaska. I hope you understand you influence public opinion on a regional level and this time I, and the real experts, feel y, ou are dead wrong on this issue.
First, drilling in Alaska does not pose a threat to the wildlife, unless you plan on moving the oil through a pipeline in the most remote and harsh conditions in Alaska. There has already been one attempt to blow up the current pipeline by a disgruntled Canadian engineer who was putting his money on oil futures. In today's crazy terrorist climate I really feel that drilling in Alaska would pose a great risk to our National Security.
Secondly, it is true that there is an incredible supply of oil off our western coast, but the oil companies really don't have a desire to drill for that oil due , to the cost involved in bringing it to the market. By the time that oil could be brought to the marketplace, at whatever price, our country would have been able to save well over the entire reserve amount of oil located there by stricter guidelines for auto fuel mileage and alternative sources such as hydrogen cells for automobiles.
Bill, I feel that most of time you are right on, but this time I feel you have fallen into the political policy agenda that divides this country instead of the policy that provides for this country.
From: Judi - Borden Indiana (7/1, 8/08)
I work on Barret Avenue and I daily go home down Jefferson to I-64W. Most evenings there are about 30 - 50 cyclists on that route. They take up the two right lanes and then ride on the white line between the 2nd and 3rd lane, leaving only one lane out of four for cars to drive in. I'm afraid to drive in the 2nd from the left lane never knowing what they are going to do. It is very upsetting to follow them for six to eight blocks never know, ing what they will do. Also, they don't ride two across. Sometimes they ride five to six across the two or three lanes.
Then, they want to complain that people in cars have no respect for them on the road. We need just a little from them also.
From: Justin - Shelb, yville, Kentucky (7/17/08)
Today's segment about oil drilling was grossly ill-informed and riddled with half truths. What Bill Lamb failed to mention, and what many speculators around the commodities market fail to recognize, is that the current controlling authority and production source of our oil is OPEC, a corporation that has time and time again muscled the U.S. out of competitive production prospects and refuses to allow the U.S. as a member country. Their control of the oil , market and its pricing is absolute.
Any new source of oil the U.S. could possibly discover would be an immediate competition to OPEC and its interest in U.S. consumption. Then, the US would have to find some way to maintain a new independent regu, lation of fuel without OPEC and somehow regulate that fuel to a market that would be so dependent on these new sources that there would be no possible export value to any of it and prices would skyrocket regardless.
If drilling were allowed and the fields found even produced twice as much as expected, it would be more likely that we would have to allow OPEC to control it just to keep prices at their current level.
From: Delta - Louisville (7/17/08)
Concerning your editorial titled "Open the Oil Fields":
The problem lies a little deeper that just Congress, but with the Democratic Party which is the majority responsible for blocking any new oil field being drilled. At first it seemed that the Dem, ocrats were concerned about the possible damage to land, oceans or nature. But sometimes I think they are just rejecting any ideas from the Republican Party, and if so, they should learn to work with others.
From: Konrad - Louisville (7/17/08)
Regarding Bill Lamb's comm, ents on 7/17, he said something to the extent of "it will take decades to develop the technology to use renewable sources, so why not use the existing oil reserves?"
Too bad he didn't mention that building the rigs and the infrastructure to drill and extract the oil will also take decades. It seems to me that this is a rather important piece of information he left out.
From: John - Charlestown, Indiana (7/16/08)
I have no doubt that smoking, as well as second hand smoke, is harmful. But the last time I checked, smoking was not illegal. If I owned a business, an, d I wanted to allow smoking, that should be m, y business, and no one else's.
What gives you or anyone else the right to dictate to me what I can or can't do in my business? If you don't want to go into a smoking establishment, it seems logical to me, -- HEY STUPID, DONT GO IN THERE!
The same goes for owners that opt for a non-smoking environment. I smoke and guess what? I don't go to these places. See, I am intelligent enough to understand that if an establishment has a no-smoking policy, I have the option not to go there.
This smoking deal is , really not as important or as difficult as you and everyone else make it out to be. It should be up to the owner of the business and no one else. Keep your nose, as well as the government's, out of my affairs.
Remember this too: If you drive a car, you too are a smoker !
From: John - Salem, Indiana (7/15/08)
Of course, immediately exploring and drilling our energy reserves would not help the fuel situation now. But waiting to do so will only prolong the agony that Americans endure. How stupid do politicians think that we Americans are? The one thing that they seem to lack is a lick of common sense.
From: Jerome - Louisville (7/9/08)
I wish to comment on what Bill Lamb said about Louisville. I've been a resident of this city since I was a child. In all my 26 years, I have to say that there are better places to live than here. The malls are not much, and there is too much commerce geared toward white people and never the blacks.
There are never enough jobs to go around, plus there's not enough going on. Most of the people here are narrow-minded and not too friendly. It gets miserable for me living here, and when I get the chance, I plan to move to another city.
From: Jamie - Jeffersonville, Indiana (7/7/08)
It seems tragic, day in and day out, that about 95 % or more of the news coverage that is shown is nothing but negativity. How in the world can you explain devoting several hours of the day to nothing but all the terrible acts and terrible situations t, hat occur around Louisville and surrounding areas? I think there should be a poll taken to see what people truly think about the way the news is conducted. Not a poll that is leading in any way, but unbiased. I can't speak for everyone, but I, for the most part, have stopped watching.
I would just like to see a more positive picture of our community going across the airwaves. If it really is all negative, then I think someone should actually do some investigating. I don't know who came up with the notion that this sells well with a community.
From: Kevin - Mount Washington, Kentucky (7/7/08)
I truly enjoy Mr. Lamb's points of view, and he's always been dead-on in his thinking. I hope he addresses the Club, Villa Fontana situation soon. The place needs to be shut down - period!
Theatre Square is somewhere you don't want to be on Saturday nights, and it can't be a welcome sight for visitors staying at the Brown Hotel. This is now the thir, d shooting that I'm aware of concerning this club, and now there are bullet holes in the offices of Kindred Healthcare. When is enough enough?
From: Justin - Shelbyville, Kentucky (7/3/08)
I have to remind Bill , Lamb and the rest of Louisville that the recent Mayor's award for Louis, ville as the "most livable city" is not an accredited award with any focus on actual statistics or the actual standard of living in Louisville. In fact, the national convention of mayors that chose Louisville for this award based their decision on a very small sample of Louisville's overall population and infrastructure. So much information was missing from this selection process that it cannot be called credible by any stretch of the imagination.
Louisville is still the #5 most polluted city in the U.S. The World Health Organization ranks Louisville in poorer general health standing then every other city that had been nominated for this award. The average IQ among, the various education outlets and the general population is 10 points lower than the national average, meaning that Kentucky in general is below average nationally in education.
I would really like to see the actual data that this award is based on. I imagine they only focused on the population of the Highlands and businesses like Humana.
From: Lisa - Middletown, Kentucky (7/2/08)
I wa, s a , bit upset this morning to hear Madonna Flood make the comment about Doug Hawkins and his efforts to gain some favor by causing , issues about the bunker in the south end.
I think Doug has been put in a situation where he is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. If he ignores the issue, he is ignoring the people he represents. If he pushes the issue for his people, he is a troublemaker.
I just want to know if Madonna Flood would do the same for her people. If she were put into the same situation, would she defend and try to protect her people?
I live in Middletown and this has nothing to do with me except that I own a flooring design center on Dixie Highway and I ca, n feel their pain. I would hope that my representative would do the same for us here.
From: S.A. - Rineyville, Kentucky (6/30/08)
It is my opinion that every elected incumbent in the Kentucky and Federal goverments should be voted out of office. With the prices of gasoline and other commodities at record highs, the personnel that hold office are not doing the work they were elected to do. Kentucky should not increase its gasoline tax at this time, and there should have been a legislative move to prevent this.
Not only did our state government not provide for its residents, our federal legislators have done nothing for the United States as a whole, nor have they done anything for the individual states of America. I am committed to voting against any incumbent that runs for office whether it is local, state, or federal.
From: Shirley - Louisville (6/27/08)
I would like to ask Congressman John Yarmuth why he has not signed the petition to Congress to "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less."
Congressman Yarmuth needs to know how the lives of his constituents are impacted by the price of fuel, and needs to stop using the empty rhetoric that keeps the status quo.
There is no problem that Americans cannot solve. If Congress hadn't implemented such harsh strictures on our own , exploration, drilling, refining, development , and use of energy, we would not have a problem today. Once more, government is the probl, em, not the solution.
Please ask Congressman Yarmuth who benefits by his non-action? It is certainly not his constituents.
From: Dick - Louisville (6/24/08)
I could not agree mo, re with your opinion regarding our ineffective state legislators. It is time to "throw the bums out," and I will vote against ALL incumbents and encourage others to do the same.
From: John - Louisville (6/23/08)
The real victims in all of this protesting at Fourth Street Live are the poor waiters who are losing tips due to no one wanting to eat there. These people are innocent third party victims who do not have a dog in this fight. The Carpenters union has a real black eye over this because only one or two percent of people support them. We will never get a fair ordinance because the Democrats who are in control -- including Jerry A, bramson -- ALL accept big union money.
From: Matthew - Louisville (6/20/08)
I saw your rant about the Fourth Street Live activity downtown. Have you been down to Fourth Street any time recently? It is the trashiest place on earth at night. If you think a couple of protesters are causing disruption, what about when I take my parents down there for an even, ing drink and every bar has half-naked ladies dancing on the tables? Oh, and did I mention that these ladies WORK for the bars as bartenders? When I say half-naked, I mean bra and , panties. Every bar is doing this and it looks pitiful. If I would say anything about wrongful activity down there it would be about that.
From: Bill - Louisville (6/20/08)
These people protesting at Fourth Street Live are NOT union drywall people, only people the union gets from a homeless shelter and pay MINIMUM WAGES to stand on the sidewalk and, harass anyone who is within hearing distance. I agree with you 100% -- this is a public pain, and there should be an ordinance to get these and groups like this off the street. They serve no purpose.
From: Stephen (6/19/08)
Road Rage is understandable and it affects everyone. However, the incident in Indiana recently is outrageous. I myself have ridden a motorcycle since 1982. Automobile drivers are very disrespectful, rude and downright road hogs when it comes to sharing the road with actual motorcycles. People in automobiles will run up on the rear end of yo, ur motorcycle as if they are not going to stop, change lanes on you intentionally to throw you off guard, or pull out in front of you to beat you or even injure you. Things have even reached the point where I have had to get off the roadway and get to a public location to escape from automobile drivers trying to run me down.
What this motorcyclist did - in approaching this woman -- may not have been the smartest thing to do. However, I understand his rage. We really don't know what occurred prior to the shooting, or what happened prior to what was captured on the store video, other than what the woman in question states. Even if that is the case, any taunting of this man after the shooting was immoral and should be unacceptable by the community.
From: Cathy - Louisville (6/20/08)
I, too, was offended when the police officer referred to the rapist as a "gentleman," and could not believe my e, ars at the time. Thank you for addressing this to everyone.
Other words that also are abused by far too many on TV and radio are "farther" and "further." Notice how the weathe, r reporters especially constantly misuse the two words. They're also misused on commercials.
I can almost understand why foreigners are not interested in learning the English language because those of us living here don't even use our language correctly!
From: Scott - Louisville (6/19/08
University of Kentucky President Lee Todd Jr. accepted a $95,500 bonus this year, yet no one at the University will be getting raises due to budget cuts. My wife has to do without a raise in pay this year, yet he gets to receive a HUGE bonus. Now how is that fair?
I fe, el like he should have not accepted the bonus and put it back into the budget to help lower costs on tuition or other funding that the University needed.
From: Truman - Louisville (6/18/08)
I appreciated your comments regarding the misuse of the word "gentleman" when describing a rapist. It seems to me that our local law enforcement spokespersons frequently misuse words and/or use improper grammar (which is my personal pet peeve) when communicating via news broadcasts. Several years ago while married to an Indiana State trooper, I made the observation that a command of the English language is obviously not a requirement to be a cop. One would think that if a facet of one's job is to act as a spokesperson, proper speech would be a requirement.
From: Michael - Sellersburg, Indiana (6/18/08)
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. You should always use your words with respect. The officer was doing that. You are not.
From: Cheryl - Campbellsburg, Kentucky (6/18/08)
I love Bill Lamb and watch Fox in the Morning every weekday without fail, but was irked by the "Certainly Not a Gentleman" segment. When the officer said "she was raped at gunpoint by the gentleman," I picked up on that as well, and I agree it was a faux pas, to say the least. But do you really think it warranted Mr. Lamb launching into a negative editorial?
Everyone uses incorrect terminology or makes grammatical errors from time to time. Try listening to your own staff.
From: Jason - Louisville (6/18/08)
I have to say your editorial about calling a rapist a "gentleman" was one of the worst Points of View aired. I feel this was a waste of time, and the air time could have been used for more important news than what a police spokesperson said.
Sorry if you disagree!
From: Randall - Corydon, Indiana (6/18/08)
I just can't understand --
If a gas station is caught charging way too much, there is a phone line to the state prosecuting attorney's office for price gouging.
It seems to me that if the oil companies claim to have billions in profit, isn't that price gouging?
Here's a suggestion: The government should cap the price so oil companies can't make all those billions in profit.
On another topic -- When an illegal mother an, d father come to America and have a baby, because the baby is born in America that makes the child an American citizen. Well, the way I feel about it is, if the parents are illegal then so is the baby.
I'm not saying hospitals should not help deliver the child. I'm saying if your parents are not supposed to be in the country then you aren't supposed to be either.
It's that simple. No social security number, no American citizen. Let them have their child, and then deport them.
From: Jeana - Jeffersonville (6/17/08)
I, along with everyone else, am well aware o, f the gas prices and the effect they are having on our lives, our community, our nation and even our world. But I find it overkill that in a ten-minute time slot on your news there was a story about how the gas prices have affected TARC, their effect of the economy on homeless children, how the price of oil has gone up again and the effect of that on the stock market and how the predictions for the upcoming hurricane season will cause the price of oil to go up more.
I have to wonder what you found to report on before the gas prices started going up. I had to change the channel even though the weather was coming on because I was truly afraid that somehow you would find a way to tie the gas prices in with the weather, and I just couldn't bear that.
Please give it a break. Hopefully you found some other things to talk about during the hour, but I'll never know because of the overkill in the ten-minute period I was watching.
From: Steve - Cincinnati, Ohio (6/14/08)
Regarding the elderly Louisville man who fatally shot two intruders -- chalk one up for the good guys. Obviously, the two thugs that broke into the man's home (with a firearm) were not there to sell him Girl Scout cookies. At what point is one's life in jeopardy?
Those two broke the law by breaking into the (wrong) house, and paid the ultimate price. Well, at least the taxpayers of Kentucky won't have to pay for those two to be tried and jailed
From: , Geoff - Louisville (6/12/08)
I would just like to say that I sincerely appreciate this community service that you provide in giving us these editorials. I love hearing your opinions.
Keep up the good work!
From: Art - Jeffersonville, Indiana (6/6/08)
Your tribute to your employee's World War II father, and Vetera, ns in general, was admirable. However, there is a situation at hand that needs immediate attention. We are losing our WW II Veterans at a rate of up to 2000 a day - that's three quarters of a milli, on a year.
I would like to see corporate America get together and give back something by sending the WW II Veterans who couldn't o, therwise afford it to see their Memorial in Washington D.C. I helped a person from Wickliffe, Kentucky send 17 bus loads of WW II Veterans to D.C, so I know it can be done.
From: Jay - Louisville (6/6/08)
I just saw your editorial about groups who set up camp to collect donations at street intersections.
I totally agree with banning these people.
For years, I have seen these people rush between moving cars to collect pennies and I think it is very dangerous.
A few years ago I came up with my solution. As I see one of these people walking alongside my car I signal them to come to the window. As I roll it down. I extend my hand towards the bucket and say "Sorry, I don't give money to fools who play in traffic." Then I roll my window back up.
I know this won't solve the problem but hopefully one day it will make one of these people think seriously before they play in traffic.
From: Phyllis - Borden, Indiana (6/5/08)
Regarding the man on West Broadway who successfully defended himself against the pair of home invaders -- good for him!! It's about time someone stood up to these thugs!
If charges are brought against this man, shame on the judicial system. Those two boys should have been working somewhere earning their keep instead of preying on hardworking honest citizens!
From: Kathleen - (6/6/08)
Street pandering should definitely be illegal however, there should be no exemptions. Even though the Crusade helps to save lives, and had a role in saving mine shortly after birth, no one is safe pandering in the middle of highways. There are too many distractions for drivers today and this just adds to the mix.
The Crusade should set up designated donation points (like the kettles the Salvation Army sets up at Christmas) and continue going door to door to reach their goals.
From: Jim and Judy - Louisville (6/6/08)
We applaud your editorial this evening regarding various groups "collecting" at area intersections. We have often commented the same points you made in your editorial.
As we recall, there was a county ordinance relative to this issue to keep non-Crusade groups from "collecting". Only the WHAS Crusade for Children was allowed with emergen, cy vehicles marking the intersections. Either we've misunderstood, or the ordinance just isn't enforced.
From: Jay - Louisville (6/6/08)
I just sa, w the segment about groups who set up camp at street intersections on the Morning News. I totally agree with banning these people. For years I have seen these people rush between moving cars to collect pennies and I think it is very dangerous.
A few years ago I came up with my solution. As I see one of these people walking along side my car I signal them to come to the window as I roll it down. I extend my hand towards the bucket and say... Sorry, I don't give money to fools who play in traffic. Then I roll my window back up. I know this won't solve the problem but hopefully one day it will make one of these people think seriously before they play in traffic.
From: K, athleen - Louisville (6/5/08)
Street pandering should definitely be illegal. However, there should be no exemptions.
Even though the Crusade helps to save lives -- and had a role in saving mine shortly after birth -- no one is safe panhandling in the middle of highways. There are too many distractions for drivers today and this just adds to the mix.
The Crusade should set up designated donation points (like the kettles the Salvation Army sets up at Christmas) and continue going door to door to reach their goals.
From: David - Louisville (6/5/08)
I agree with about 96% of Bill Lamb's Points of View, but at times he really sticks his foot in his mouth and makes a fool of himself, especially when he advocates violations of law. Such is the case with his claim that we should ban panhandling on street intersections except for the WHAS 11 Crusade for Children. That is nuts, and a violation of both our First Amendments and the Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. Constitution -- sort of like saying Republicans can do it but not Democrats.
Did Lamb not learn anything from the Churchill Downs exemption recently struck down?
From: Carl - Louisville (6/2/08)
I completely agree with your recent editorial on the Congressional hearings with the oil executives.
After watching the TV news bites from these hearings, it is easy to draw the conclusion that this is nothing more than a dog and pony show of politicians who are up for re-election making sure they get their faces on national TV to show the folks back home that they are trying to do something about the spiraling cost of gasoline.
The tired refrain of "supply and demand" played by the oil industry to conceal their greed simply doesn't play in Peoria anymore. In speech after speech, Ralph Nader places the blame squarely on Wall Street traders and speculators and tells us that supply and demand is not the reason for the skyrocketing prices. Even members of OPEC, including Saudi Arabia, tell us the run-up in prices , is not due to supply and demand, but rather due to traders and speculators on Wall Stre, et and elsewhere.
It seems incredible that this nation - supposedly the greatest on earth - has a government that is so impotent it is u, nable to deal with the greed of Wall Street and multinational oil companies who collectively are on the verge of destroying the nation. Barack Obama is right. It is time for a change. It is time for the government of this country to be taken away from the incompetence of Congress and the present administration and be given back to the people.
This energy disaster did not need to happen. Congress would have stopped this dead in its tracks if our elected representatives were as concerned about the welfare of the people as they are about making sure the continue to receive their political contributions from the multinational oil companies.
From: Dick - Louisville (6/2/08)
I could not agree more with your opinion about our state legislature. It is time to "throw the bums out," and I will vote against ALL incumbents and encourage others to do the same.
From: Todd - Louisville (5/30/08)
As the operations manager for a trucking company, I'm all too familiar with the laws. Trucks (tractor/trailers) are bound by federal law to maintain a safety standard. Upon inspection, the truck can and will be cited for random offenses. These include brake lights, marker lights and turn signals. If cited for a brake light or a turn signal not functioning the unit cannot move until it is repaired.
This said, how on earth are the multiple lawn-care trailers being pulled throughout the Louisville Metro area getting away with non-functioning lights on the rear? This poses a serious problem when the rear of the towing vehicle cannot be seen due to the overloading of lawn equipment.
Fairness is only to those that are caught? Trucks must cross weigh stations multiple times during the course of one trip. Each time they are subject to inspecti, on.
I realize the Metro Police have enough on their plate, but as I stated before, this is a major safety concern. Thanks for allowing me to spill my guts.
From: Ed - Crestwood (5/28/08)
The notion that oil companies will eventually develop a profit-limiting conscience is naive. Competitive corporations develop consciences only when profitable to do so. Having for-profit corporations in charge of our petroleum distribution system is a fundamental flaw which has become evident when we put an oil man in the White House. I believe oil companies are getting all they can before the next administration takes power.
We need to examine w, hy it is t, hat we use controlled monopolies to distribute electricity and other utilities, but not motor fuel. If we allowed electric utilities to operate as we do the oil companies, they would also eventually consolidate and figure out that the most profit is earned when capacity is insufficient, justifying price increases every time a new customer goes on line.
From: Kelly - Louisville (5/28/08)
I totally agree with your call for a "Corporate Conscience." It's ridiculous that the oil guys should make 12 million dollars.
On another note, why should athletes and actors make millions of dollars a year? I guarantee that most of the general public works many more hours than either of those groups! The two people in our household made barely over $40,000 last year and had to pay state and federal taxes. How many people making millions a year have to pay?
From: Nancy - Clarksville, Indiana (5/23/08)
The government is saying the high gas prices are due to supply and demand. Spoiled and greedy Americans are not giving up their gas guzzlers, driving less, or taking any other action on their own.
There is a solution, and it happened once before. And with a gallon of gas costing the same as a gallon of milk, we need an immediate solution.
Why can't we introduce a bill to bring back gas rationing?, It would help us to help ourselves. Teens are still ripping and running all over, with their parents paying the price, driving to and from schools instead of taking the school bus, , driving to parties and just cruising.
Cut out your NASCAR races. Cut out the practice of officials traveling everywhere in limos.
Hybrid cars are not the immediate answer. Who can afford them? Alternative fuel (made from corn) is not the answer. That is driving food prices out of sight, while many are hungry right here in the United States.
Pollutants are affecting our environment by creating global warming and killing off our animals.
The only sensible and immediate solution is to ration gas. Let's show the Saudis we can live without them.
Let's tell our Presidential candidates that we expect them to earn their nomination and to do so now.
From: Bill - Louisville (5/23/08)
Bill Lamb needs to comment about the new c, ar purchased for Jon Draud by the State. There is no way anyone should have approved an additional $13,000 for adding a GPS and hands-free phone to a car.
Everyone knows that a GPS does not require a V-8 engine. Now we will also have to pay extra for the fuel to run that V-8 engine. They could have purchased a less, expensive car, then gone to Best Buy or Circuit City and for $200 purchased a GPS and hands-free phone.
Who approved this stupid deal? Why did the dealer push , t, he V-8? Maybe he couldn't sell it to a regular customer, so he sold it to the State Government so the tax payers can pay for it and the added fuel costs for the n, ext several years.
From: David - Louisville (5/23/08)
In response to the pool closings and Mayor Abramson's statements this morning about how expensive they would be to maintain:
What happened to all the money that Rubbertown received to help their health? I will tell you -- Dr. Adewale Troutman spent it foolishly. He directed a "co, nsent decree," spent two million dollars of free money and no one showed up to his free clinics.
The Louisville Health and Wellness Cabinet is a joke. They spend money getting Dr. Tro, utman r, ecognized to get a position in the Cabinet, but they don't spend money on the needy. Most recently, Dr. Troutman spent 1.6 million dollars on a campaign on KET to let us know pe, ople in specific zip codes have poorer health. Well duh...
Dr. Troutman, that's because you're closing their pools. Don't you think that 1.6 million could have gone a long way toward keeping those six pools open? It could have rebuilt them and put in playgrounds.
I think someone should investigate the spending of the Department of Health and Wellness and see what exactly our tax dollars are paying for. The money that man makes is ridiculous, and he has our Mayor for Life wrapped around his finger tips. Not only does he allow Dr. Troutman to break the law by campaigning for Obama during the public presentations of his stupid and wasteful programs -- he supports it!
Thank you for allowing me to vent.
From: Ethel - Louisville (5/22/08)
I want to make a comment about a problem with the voting process I experienced on May 20, 2008.
First, I was asked out loud in a room full of people what party I was voting. I felt this was my personal choice and I did not have to share this with strangers.
Second, a lot of people did not have the opportunity to vote because, they were not registered under the right party affiliation. I am talking about people that have been registered active voters -- who have been voting Democrat all their , lives. Now this year they are registered as Republican, Independent, or not registered at all.
What is wrong with this picture? I think the community deserves an explanation.
From: Steve - Louisville (5/21/08)
How pathetic can it get? All I can say is Coach Gillespie's actions reek of , desperation. He seems to be so concerned with missing out on more sensible recruits that he feels he must get a leg up by recruiting eighth-graders.
I hear these "eighth-gr, aders" are 15 years old. Are you kidding me? I was a Junior in High School at 15. UK is definitely sending the wrong message, which is "We are desperate and have stooped to a new low level."
Sad. Real sad.
From: Westley - Fredericksburg, Indiana (5/20/08)
Fox 41 recently ran a story about folks in Chicago driving to Indiana in search of lower gas prices. Toward the end of the story was a man who uses his laptop to search for lower prices. But there's a problem. This guy is driving a Ford Excursion -- by himself no less.
How does someone complain about the price of fuel when they drive such a gas hog? The oil companies are not innocent by any means, but many Americans have brought this on themselves by driving huge vehicles and building huge houses they don't need. It's ridiculous! So many people are wasting fuel while so few of us are trying to conserve.
I personally commute 40 miles one way to work. That's 80 miles a day just to get to work and back. I intentionally purchase fuel-efficient vehicles (I ride a motorcycle when weather permits), and yet during every morning commute I see large SUVs and gas guzzling vehicles with one lone driver inside.
<, P>It makes me sick. I can see the need for a larger vehicle for people with large families who usually travel together, but any other reason is simply to have a status symbol.
Hey idiots -- lose the Escalade and buy a Toyota. I see people all the time driving these large vehicles just for show, but this raises fuel prices for all of us, and that's not fair.
I think many Americans need to seriously rethink their priorities.
From: Matt - Louisville (5/20/08)
I have a problem with the fact that we are a closed party state. I got turned down and could not vote in the primaries because I was registered as a nonpartisan -- not to mention that I would have had to register months ago to vote.
All this seems shady to me. In Indiana, you can choose your party the day of the primaries. As a tax-pa, ying American, I feel like I got screwed.
From: Bob - Valley Station (5/15/08)
Very few of us can afford the gas prices currently being levied upon us by the oil speculators and industries. While oil companies reap huge profits, the majorit, y of us try to figure out how to go to work and have enough left over to feed our family.
In the near future, high gas prices now will pay big for future generations. We are all paying for oil at record prices, but there is an end in sight. Industries around the world are working on new technologies where oil will not be required. Do a search on the Internet to see only a small percentage of industries determined , to get rid of oil.&nbs, p; When the non-oil-powered vehicles arrive, oil will then only be necessary for lubrication.
When this happens we must remember these times. The oil industry will start whining about not be able to make enough profit and having layoffs, and OPEC may be a thing for the history books.
We pay now, and they will pay later. But in the end, the world will be a better place to live. I just hope my children live a better life than I.
From: Troy - Louisville (5/14/08)
Unfortunately, everyone I know feels that one person c, annot make a difference. Therefore, no one is making a difference. This needs to be a joint effort and all governments need to step in. I hate to say it, but maybe it's time that a single person without children is no longer allowed to purchase an 18 mpg SUV or purchase a 3,500 sq. foot home (consuming large amounts of energy). If we, the people, cannot make t, he effort, I'm afraid it needs to be made for us.
From: Rita - LaGrange (5/14/08)
I agree that everyone has contributed to rising oil prices if you look strictly at market supply and demand. But governments at all levels share in the responsibility. The Bush administration secretly devised energy policies that appear to give all the benefits to Big Oil without any responsibility to meet any type of goals and objectives aimed at reducing the current problem. Federa, l agencies have to meet their report card objectives - why doesn't Big Oil? If, they are to receive tax breaks, let them be held to objectives that will reduce our dependence on oil.
State and local governments have failed to address long term solutions to energy problems -- to include mass transportation and energy standards. I hear politic, ians talking about gimmicks to give us a break of few cents, but no discussion of what it's going to take to get people out of their cars and into efficient public transportation and personal vehicles.
Notice that politicians, including President Bush going to his daughter's wedding, are still riding around in gas-guzzling SUVs and limos. Leadership means leading by example and doing more than just talking.
From: David - Louisville (5/14/08)
You hit the nail on the he, ad when you advocated personal responsibility to mitigate ever-rising gas prices. I take TARC to work four times a week and have noticed an increase in ridership. My brother now carpools to work with a friend, and my wife and I have consolidated our trips.
What is most disturbing about all this, though, is the fact that as middle class, hard-working citizens, we seem to be at the mercy of unregulated hedge fund managers and futures traders who care about nothing more than driving up the price of crude to pad their own pockets. And don't you find it utterly embarrassing that President Bush has to go overseas to beg the Saudis to open up the oil spigots when Congress, time and time again, has failed to permit clean drilling in remote wilderness areas?
For years, Norway, Mexico and othe, r countries have drilled offshore and , have wreaked no environmental damage. Yet a few, vocal, recalcitrant environmental extremists want to protect their political territory at the expense of their fellow human beings' standard of living and way of life.
Like it or not our economy at present is almost totally dependent on oil. Sure, we'd all like to wean ourselves from fossil fuels, but unless this country commits a major investment to energy independence, it won't happen anytime soon. Our government is so out of touch with the concerns of everyday Americans that it sickens me, all for political posturing and catering to their lobbyist friends. I agree with you that personal responsibility is important, but many of us are doing these things already and yet there is no abatement in gas prices. It's discouraging though, that our government has not partnered with us to address what may very well become a serious national security threat in the future.
From: Stephanie - Louisville (5/14/08)
I agree with you that we should do our part in cutting down our use of gas. However, gasoline in our cars is only 1/2 of a barrel of crude oil. We also need to cut down our use of products made from the other half of the barrel, like plastic bags, lotions, perfumes and shampoos made from petroleum, dishwashing liquid that uses petroleum, disposable diapers, etc. Obviously we can't stop using petr, oleum, b, ut we can be more responsible and conserve, reuse and recycle.
From: P.D. - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (5/14/08)
I certainly agree with you on the points you made about doing something to conserve gas rather than complaining about the prices. If you are a person who lives in town or in the suburbs, these ideas are great.
I used to walk to town or work whenever I could. But now I live on a farm. What ideas, do you have for the farmers? Nobody wants to carpool way out in the country, and walking to the store is not an option. Will TARC come out here?
The farmers need their equipment for crops and animals. This equipment requires fuel. Also, many farmer's wives, or children, as well as themselves, have jobs in town to supplement income. So what do you suggest for these people?
Just some food for thought.
From: Melissa - Louisville (5/14/08)
Yes we need to change our habits. But gas companies are making a billion dollar profit a year. Who needs that much money?
I think the government should step in and cap gas prices at $2.50 a gallon. Gas compa, nies would still make their profit, and we would get a halfway fair price for gas.
From: Cheryl - Jeffersonville, Indiana (5/14/08)
I live in Jeffersonville, and I have a very nice job off of Crittenden Drive, but I have gotten another job which starts next week right here in Jeffersonville, which is within walking distance of my house. I can not afford $4.00 a gallon while only making $6.00 an hour. Especially with three kids.
From: Diana - Georgetown, Indiana (5/14/08)
I also am very concerned about rising gas costs. I am a home health nurse, and not only do I have a 50-mile commute to and from Louisville, but I see patients in their homes so I am in my car all day long. The high price of gas is killing me.
Sure wish some one , could do something about it.
From: Michael - LaGrange, Kentucky (5/13/08)
I believe that the gas prices are at a ridiculous high., I grasp the concept that crude oil is a shrinking resource -- this is not new found information. We have known this time was eventually going to arrive, and it did -- sooner than we wished. But having this knowledge, oil companies have been overly ignorant in pocketing their billions of dollars in profit rather than seeking alternative energy sources.
Other energy alternatives have emerged over the years from hydrogen, natural gas, electricity -- even distilled water powered vehicles. What happened to them? Gone -- sold to the oil companies, never to be researched any further.
Meanwhile, we rely on the automakers to research new alternative energy resources. The behavior of the big oil companies are just plain unacceptable and should not be tolerated. Look at Brazil, for instance. They no longer rely on crude oil, but totally rely on a new ethanol g, as derived from grass that yields close to 15 times the energy units as one, energy unit of crude oil. They have, as a whole country, changed over to this new gas and now their gas prices are 80 cents!
So this poses a new question: Why not in America?
Just as big tobacco has had to pay states for health ca, re with their profits, why not make big oil companies pay for research, installing, and converting over to a new energy alternative?
From: Dustin - Jeffersonville, Indiana (5/13/08)
As you are the manager of Fox 41, I am sure you have seen the recent shooting on the Louisville TARC bus. This type of , behavior really makes me want to get up an hour earlier to get on the bus and p, ay my $1.25.
Secondly, going out and purchasing a $25,000 hybrid to make up for the $1.00 per gallon rise in gasoline prices makes about as much sense as the fat people scarfing down their cupcakes and wondering why they are fat.
Finally, should we all go and purchase shopping carts to push with us on our casual walk to the drug store or grocery store, so we don't have to carry our 15 bags of groceries back?
From: David - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (5/13/08)
I heard you say we should basically learn to live like paupers, and learn to conserve in our extremely rich nation.
Did you consider that we supply a , huge portion of the world's food, steel, and other natural resources?
Should employees of a mismanaged, formerly rich corporation learn to conserve and live on less to support those mismanaging it, so they can continue to stay in charge?
Check your logic.
Did you carpool or take TARC to work today?
As our prosperity declines and gas prices rise, we will continue to witness more of our nation tearing itself apart and gradually weakening.
There is no such thing as love or restraint when you have two capitalists starving to death.
If we lose the ability to feed and maintain our mechanical slaves of today, we will all be facing the same bankruptcy, loss of our property and virtu, al slavery our Confederate forefathers were looking at in the last Civil War.
Who will protect your well paid hide when the poor are starving and become the majority? Will you ride TARC beside them?
From: Carolyn - LaGrange, Kentucky (5/10/08)
President Bush will not make the oil companies lower their prices, nor will Congress. I'd like FOX 41 to check on why they have a gasoline credit card allowing the, m to charge their gas to the American taxpayer.
From: Kip - Louisville (5/10/08)
I was wondering why the news media never give the names of the judges or parole board members that so often use very poor judgment in the release of inmates or suspects on trial.
The most current situation is that of Davon Tooley, who was put on home incarceration while awaiting trial for murder, then cut off his ankle bracelet and escaped. Why would the judge not keep this person behind bars pending his trial? What did this judge think was going to happen? When you have a common thug facing a murder trial, of course he is going to take any opportunity he has to get away.
Then there are the cases where a suspect is convicted of a crime, but the judge releases them and tells them to come back for their sentencing hearing to find out how much time they are going to serve.
I remember about a year or so ago when there were three different instances within three months. All were sex offenders that were convicted, then told to go home and then come back fo, r sentencing. Big surprise that none of them showed up to find out how much time they were going to get!
Finally, you have the repeat offenders -- criminals who have a record a mile long of the same offenses. Some are sex offenders and child molesters, some are robbery suspects, some like to assault people on a regular basis, and some prefer breaking and entering. But they have all proven that this is all they will do, and it is obvious that if they are released, they will continue to do the same thing again until they finally kill someone.
Just look at all of the child molesters that have lengthy records for molesting children -- some of them as many as 40 or 50 convictions, all on separate incidents! And the judges think it is fine to let them off easy or let them go home until their sentencing, or the , parole boards think it's safe to let these people out of prison early.
I think that when these bonehead judges exercise such poor judgment -- and the parole boards as well -- they should be held just as responsible and accountable for the crimes as the criminals that commit them. When they know what these people are capable of and they let them go anyway, they know that they are putting the public at risk. They should face criminal charges as well. Accessory to the crim, e, aiding and abetting -- whatever we can throw at them.
At the very least, the news media should always release the name of the judges or parole board members that make the decision to release these people, or put , them in situations like home incarceration where they have every opportunity to escape and be a threat to the public.
We are very lucky that Devon Tooley did not kill anyone else while he was on the run. He stated that he would not be taken alive. Then again, who knows for sure that he didn't and we just have not found out a, bout it yet? After all, he could have killed someone for their money to support himself while he was on the run.
The point is, he has allegedly already killed one person and escaped, which leads anyone with any common sense to the conclusion that he would do it again.
Please, always give the names of the judges and make them feel all of the shame that they should be feeling for making these idiotic decisions that put us all in danger. Maybe if they felt the embarrassment and humiliation that they deserve when they do this type of thing, they would stop putting you and me in danger by giving these criminals an out.
From: Dawn - Louisville (5/8/08)
I disagree with your statement about horse racing. How would you like to be ridden down a mile track while being whipped with a hard leather whip when you are running as fast as you c, an? I am glad PETA is involved and are making a big deal out of it.
What do the owners care anyway? They still got their money for Eight Belles winning 2nd place. They just replace the horse and move on.
Back in the old days, horses might have been bred to run like that, but they no longer are. By the time everything is said and done, horse racing will be banned just like dog fighting. It's all the same.
One last point: At least in other sports involving humans, they can tell you if you are hurting them. Horses just have to get beaten by the jockeys and hope they run fast so they don't get beaten as hard. This is cruelty to animals.
We charge parents for beating their children. What is the difference here?
From: Patrick - Louisville (5/7/08)
I don't know what the heck you are smoking, but to think that r, aising gas prices is the way to get them to drop is an insult to everyone. The only thing that raising the price will do is bankrupt the entire economy. No matter what you buy or do, gas and or oil have an effect on its pricing structure. The only people, who will benefit from higher prices are the owners of the oil companies and our politicians.
Lowering the price to about $1.50 per gallon would yield a fair profit, considering inflation. It would also allow the rest of the economy to survive, and help bring American jobs back to America.
I firmly believe that we should use our own oil reserves and tell the rest of the world just where they can get off. We have over 100 years supply of crude in the ground here in our own country. Let's use it. At the same time, let's put our prime research into building power plants that don't use oil to operate. You just can't convince me that with today's technology, we can't find a better way to power our nation's cars, homes and businesses.
From: Kimberley - Taylorsville, Kentucky (5/7/08)
I could not agree with you more about the gas tax. I don't think the small amount we pay in tax on gas/diesel will help much at all when fuel prices are quickly approaching $4 per gallon. However, I completely disagree with you about raising fuel taxes.
We can hardly afford to get to work now. An increase in gas prices will not reduce demand. We need gas, and unfortunately, we will cont, inue to purchase it as needed, which in turn will continue to increase demand, thus increas, ing prices. It is simple economics.
The only thing we need to increase is alternative fuels. I can't wait until we get a new president so ignorant people can see that President Bush is not controlling gas prices for profit. A Democratic president will not lower fuel costs any more than a Democratic congress could bring home the troops.
I hope people will open their eyes and realize that when we had a Republican president and Republican Congress, we had jobs, homes and affordable fuel.
From: Justin - Louisville (5/6/08)
I think you are wrong for wanting the gas tax raised. Some of us only drive when we have to, and would not enjoy having to pay even higher prices to go to work.
From: Paul - Louisville (5/6/08)
A 20-gallon fill-up at $3.50 a gallon is $70.
20 gallons less the 18-cent federal gas tax is a savings of $3.60
Get real! This savings will almost buy a family-sized bag of frozen peas - for sure, not a night on the town.
Obama is on the money.
From: Don - Louisville (5/5/08)
I don't know if my suggestion has anything to do with "Point of View," but my sugges, tion is to have "Eight Bells" (no "e") rung at both the Preakness and Belmont, as well as next year during the Derby in memory of the filly. After all, they had a memorial for Barabro this year.
From: Roger - Memphis, Indiana (5/2/08)
Your comments on limiting college tuition hikes (4/29/08) are completely off-target. Not all "education" is of benefit to , society, and the "elite" who make up the educational hierarchy need some basic lessons in economics.
From: Teah - Louisville (5/1/08)
If all citizens had a valid ID, I don't believe this situation would have been an issue. However, many African , Americans born around 1950 and earlier did not have a record of their birth. A birth certificate is required to obtain an official ID, and it is very difficult to obtain a birth certificate when a record of birth was never made. For these reasons, I believe the law is unfair.
My father had this problem. He had to get witnesses and engage in many other unconventional methods to prove he was , born on his birthday.
From: D.N. - Louisville (5/1/08)
I am writing in response to the recently aired Point of View segment on higher education, and in particularly to the man who called in and told college students to "get a job."
I am a full time student at U of L, and if I had time to get a full time job to help pay for my tuition I would. Obviously, this man has no idea about the serious gap between the wages a part time college kid can earn and the cost of tuition.
I go to school four days a week from 7:00 in the morning until 7:00 or so in the evening. I would like for this man to tell me what job will earn me enough to pay for my tuition and provide me enough for my books, a $200 parking pass, and a little importa, nt thing called food in the three full days I can work. If he would let me know where this job is, I would gladly take it.
Contrary to what this man thinks about us college kids, we DO realize that nothing in this world is free. Obviously, we're paying for what should be a basic right -- education. I do not qualify for FASFA grants, and honestly I don't know anyone who does. This does not mean these folks, including myself, , have the money for college. FAS, FA is a joke. The poverty line is a joke. When gas is approaching $4.00 a gallon, this "line" needs to be adjusted.
Obviously, I am not saying that I should receive a free education, although it is a nice thought. I know this would seriously raise taxes, I do not mind paying for an education, but I do mind going into serious debt for it. Tuition is unreasonable for the average family, and this comes from a state whose slogan on the state line signs reads "Where education pays."
Yeah, it pays -- Rick Pitino's pa, ycheck. Our legislators have not only failed me, but our whole state's future. So many gifted minds are slaving away in meager minimum wage jobs because they either cannot afford the tuition, or cannot get the loans to go to school. When education takes a backseat to the ignorant games our government plays, we don't even have a prayer.
From: Suzette - Louisville (4/30/08)
Students or their parents pay a high price for an education and do work hard to achieve higher education. Trying to work at a job while trying to attend a full time program is ludicrous and this is not an option for those trying to excel.
Our children should be provided with free tuition if attending a school within the state that they reside. Our legislators should not draw a salary or receive their benefits to help pay for higher education. In the future, those of us that vote should remember that the legislators do not have the same problems that the poor or middle class suffer. Our legislators are an elite group that votes for things that improve their lives, not ours. Eventually, higher education will be only available to this elite group and the rich. Sad!
From: Steve - Louisville (4/29/08)
I am upset over the restrictions put on Churchill Downs about horse betting. You can bet online and over the phone, but now all of a sudden yon can only bet the Oaks, the Turf Classic and the Derby itself.
Why is , this?
F, rom: Troy - , Louisville (4/24/08)
A statement was made in your viewer response to "Keeping Broadway Open." I cannot quote exactly, but someone spoke about there being so many events that are for the rich folks and that folks in the west end should be allowed to have their own events. This makes no sense to me.
First, I am not rich. , Each year, I enjoy the Great Steamboat Race, the Pegasus Para, de, and Thunder over Louisville. I try to take in more, but I at least go to those three.
Now as far as I know, all these events are free. In fact, during the Kentucky Derby Festival, there are more free events to enjoy than there are any other time of the year. None of these events are in my neighborhood, but I know they are for me. I proudly march downtow, n and enjoy!
In a time when we all try to be equal, united, and throw out all prejudices, we take a step back when someone makes statements that enforce boundaries.
From: Ken - Louisville (4/23/08)
I appeal to you as a news reporting agency to help expose the mayor's act risking 35% of JeffersonCounty's clean water supply.
I know Chief White of the LMPD assured a zero percent risk of anything happening to our water reservoir. I ask, "How can he guarantee , what will happen now or in the future?"
Example: Vehicles carrying an, y explosives having an accident at the site or in the populated area; human error at the site or in the populated area; or a chemical reaction or leakage of explosive materials at the site or in the populated area. Think of even the extremes: earthquakes, terrorist acts or vandalism. These are all possibilities.
Major Milburn, head of special operations for LMPD, went from describing the items , to be stored in the magazine as "dynamite, confiscated explosives or C-4" -- as quoted at the Wednesday, 04/16, meeting at the Southwest Government Center -- to "just fire, works"at the Mayor's Community Conversation meeting at Fairdale High School Monday, 04/21. Was there a change of the facts, Major? Are you downplaying the danger of what will be handled at the Ammo-Bomb Magazine?
The LMPD has guaranteed our safety, and the safety of our water reservoir, specifying that they would not do anything to put anyone in danger. Yet they concluded at the Mayor's Community Conversation that it could not be put at a location where methane gas is present (such as abandoned Rubbertown) for fear of an explosion! It cannot be put in a highly populated area of high travel for fear of an explosion! They are telling me, (to my face without blinking), , that there is no danger putting it beside our water reservoir? Come on! This whole thing stinks!
From: Felix - Louisville (4/23/08)
I find your comments about smoking to be very offensive. First of all, you were gung-ho about getting smoking banned completely from the city of Louisville, but unfortunately, when you are looking for someone to tax, we are the first people you come after. , I find this to be ludicrous in its obscene nature. I understand that smoking is claimed to be one of the number one killers in America, but it is a choice that we choose to make. Granted, you have the poor souls that try to accuse others of their misfortune, but again, it is our own choice. Do not put all the strains of the society, or a good portion of them, upon us. We all help in our way, but singling out one group of people is just wrong.
From: K, aren - Louisville (4/21/08)
I just saw your April 21 report on the delay in the renovation/upgrade to RiverviewPark in Southwest Jefferson County. Well, that is no surprise! It seems the Mayor can find all kinds of funding to have new businesses and stores built in Downtown Louisville, push for a new sports arena, etc. But those of us in this end of t, he county are used to being left out of all his plans. To the residents of SW Jefferson County, it seems as though all our local government's attention is always focused elsewhere. To say that we are disappointed is an understatement. Mayor Abramson may have forgotten that we helped vote him back into office.
From: Perry - Louisville (4/18/08)
Why is everybody so eager to put more taxes on just cigarettes? I have a solution that's fai, r to everybody. Why doesn't Kentucky follow Indiana's lead and add a 1% sales tax? I'd say that w, ould more than take care of Kentucky's needs for revenue, and it's fair to everybody.
From: Don - Louisville (4/18/08)
I can only praise our legislature for refusing to add additional tax burden to the heavy load we already carry. I could list many reasons not to impose new taxes, but three come to mind immediately. The economy has always had good times and bad times. During the good times, both the people and the government have sufficient money for their needs, and everyone is happy. When the bad times come however, wholesalers and retailers can raise prices to cover expenses and the government can raise taxes to cover increased costs. But the populace can only reduce their consumption to bear increased costs. All parties involved, including all the social programs our taxes pay for, need to learn to do with less, rather than place an additional burden , on those who already bear such a heavy load. All taxation, reduced to its most elemental level, involves the taking of money from the population, using a portion of it for administrative costs and overhead, and returning to the population, in the form of public services or infrastructure, much less money than they started out with. Government agencies hav, e never been wiser than the public when it comes to spending money. When the need arises for additional monies in the government's coffers, it has always been popular to: - Place that burden on a minority such as the smokers who, because of their minority status, have minimal political influence, and who have no more to gain than the general population - Hide the increase in taxes in the form of fees or taxes that do not need legislative approval; or - Shift money from the public to the state through something like the lottery or casino gambling, which , takes from the poor, gives part to an out of state company, another part to the st, ate and reduces the total wealth of the state by a significant amount. All these methods are unconscionable if not immoral.
From: Sarah - Louisville (4/18/08)
I am a smoker and I applaud our local government for not passing the 25-cent per pack tax. I felt this exclusive tax proposal was asking a small group of taxpayers who have been told we are endangering the health of o, thers to continue smoking and help to pay for new roads, colle, ge funds, teachers raises, etc. I would be more than happy to contribute my share as a taxpayer with a raise in our current sales tax from 6% to as much as 10% if needed. Then everyone would be contributing to help our state -- not just the smokers who already pay tax on their cigarettes. Where was the proposal for a 25-cent tax on a bottle of beer? Would the non-smokers vote to pass a 4% increase in our sales tax to contribute their share?
From: Sherry - Pewee Valley, Kentucky (4/18/08)
I feel your point of view on the 25-cent cigarette tax is unfair. It is wrong -- unAmerican -- to unfairly pick out one pro, duct over others and tax it unfairly. I don't smoke, but I do eat. We used to have a tax on food. Let's have everyone pay their FAIR share of taxes. When everyone stops smoking, the tax is going to have to come from somewhere else.
From: Mary Beth - Louisville (4/17/08)
It would appear that Mayor Abramson has once again shown his ability to make bad decisions without considering the consequences. The Library Tax was a bad decision. Selling the Louisville Metro Police Department's helicopter was a bad decision. And now, the decision to move the explosive storage facility to South Louisville. I was extremely pleased to see the community turn out last night, but not surprised that the Mayor didn't bother to appear. Could it be that he has decided it is not necessary to consult anyone in this city, on these decisions? Or maybe he feels that the improper "Mayor for Life" title he has earned gives him the authority to make these major decisions without discussion. I thought that was what the Community Forums were all about -- him coming out to the communities, receiving interaction on options and possible future plans. Has this changed? I am still amazed that he had the audacity to sell the Louisville Metro Police Training Facility, Southfields, to private buyers. Was this decision made due to financial stress on our city? What happens to all of the functions provided to this com, munity and our police officers now that Southfields is gone? Functions such as the Police Officer drivers training course, classrooms, shooting range, obstacle course, and - yes -- the Explosive Storage facility, before it was sent to Portland. Mayor Abramson, I highly recommend that you consider consulting the voters of this community before you make these decisions in the future, or you may fi, nd yourself known as the "Former Mayor for Life."
From: Scott - Jeffersonville, Indiana (4/16/08)
I'd be surprised if any more attention could , be given to the r, ecord breaking price of fuel these days. While a 50-cent increase per gallon means about $5 more per tank for 10 gallons, it certainly makes everything else cost more. That being said, I set my cruise control at 55 mph on the highway when cruising in my not-so-eco-friendly Toyota Tacoma. Since beginning this process, I've noticed that no one has changed their driving speeds. Speeds of 60, 70 or worse are common. Why do police get to drive so fast without lights or sirens on? Consumers want to name their price and want it now, but don't want any responsibility or additional cost for , their driving habits. So stopping to smell the roses isn't the solution, but slowing down to catch a whiff might not be a bad idea.
From: Steve - Louisville (4/16/08)
I think we should band together and throw all the bums out of state and federal government. Money is controlling all aspects. It does not appear that any of them are there to help the citizens.
,
From: Dan - Elizabethtown, Kentucky, (4/15/08)
I just saw your comments on the recent Kentucky legislature session.&, nbsp;Mr. Lamb, I couldn't agree with you more. I have become so frustrated with session after session of the same political stonewalling that I am consi, dering championing an amendment to the state constitution abolishing the legislature. The legislature can no longer act. It is impotent, dead in the water, useless. Give the governor full power to create and execute a budget, and if he does a bad job we'll elect a different one. We'd avoid paying the stumblebums who parade to Frankfort to pass such key legislation as naming the blueberry as the Kentucky state fruit (or berry -- I can't remember which), we'd get a budget of some sort, and we'd really have to watch out for shenanigans by few, er people. You are absolutely right. Witness what has happened in Indiana during the same period and compare it to Kentucky. We're mired down there with Mississippi, and it's not because we don't generate state revenue. We have one of the highest state tax rates in the nation, particularly for the poorer folks. With a state income tax, state sales tax, local taxes, fuel taxes, etc., we pay taxes on everything and we don't see any return. I was particular irked by the fact that they couldn't manage to get a proposal together to allow the voters to decide whether or not we should have casinos. It seems they don't think we voters are smart enough to make that decision. I don't really care whether they do or don't. I don't go to them, but don't mind others going if they want to. But to deny the voters the chance to decide is elitism of the highest manner. It reminds me of the wet-dry issue here in Elizabethtown that went on for years. All of the bogus arguments -- drunks in the street, higher DUI rates, etc., -- none have materialized. It seems they have all mastered the standard answer, "We couldn't get it out of committee." The big question, is how do we d, o something about it? It is almost impossible to unseat an incumbent in Kentucky, and even if you do,, get a couple of new faces, they are so far down the seniority list they have no influence. If you see a way to reverse this, I'll sign on to help!
From: Todd - Louisville (4/15/08)
SUBTERFUGE -- legal jargon for deception. That is what Kentucky's legislators are selling to us when it comes to protecting children in automobiles. This tragedy i, s pandemic in Kentucky. Every day you can find small children not restrained, and it's only a $25 fine for the offense. Parking in a handicapped parking spot is ten times more. The governor can do his little song and dance, but , in the end, children are still needlessly dying on Kentucky's roadways. Maybe we could make car seats look like slot machines and they would get more attention.
From: Chris - Floyds Knobs, Indiana (4/9/08)
I appreciate your intent to have an optimistic outlook on the struggling economy. But I would say , that using the housing market would seem to be a bad example. I am a small business owner from Southern Indiana in remodeling and new construction. I have worked for the same four market-leading builders for several years in the new construction division of my company, and advertised everywhere I could for the remodeling division. I will just put it like this: In the past two season, s I have made less then one fourth, my regular salary, and have been forced to file bankruptcy on my own home. I have not had a single new construction home in nearly a year to work on, as new homes have not sold. That drives all those contractors into remodeling, and i, t becomes very competitive. In my own optimistic point of view on that, I hope that it drives out all the "bad contractors" we hear so many desperate homeowners talking about. However, no matter how good a contractor's work may be right now,, homeowners are torn between choosing between many different contractors, and cost competition is making it harder and harder to make enough money to support my family. As I am not in the banking business I do not know this for sure, but many of my customers are saying that they have decent credit, but in instances where people would usually have great chances of purchasing these homes, their banks are much more hesitant in lending. I would believe that with the high volume of foreclosures. This also hurts contracting in that much business comes to us when a family purchases a new or used home. They tend to need to have things done to make it they way , they want it, or to do repairs to pass the usual inspections in order to buy and sell. As this "Point Of View" hit home for me directly, I have several more points I could make about the struggling industry, but I will refrain and try to keep it in a nut shell. I am not trying to be a pessimist by any means and hope I said nothing to darken your day. I usually agree with you and think you are a very intelligent man. I appreciate your segments and look forward to hearing what you have to say. So if you have any friends, or family who is in a good enough financial situation to upgrade, or repair their home, please keep my company in mind.
From: Anthony - New Albany, Indiana (4/8/08)
I'm glad that Fox 41 is doing so well, but you seem to over look the point that people are having a hard time paying for those diapers and food to feed their kids, and if you want he, althy food, you're going to pay even more. And you're also right -- the housing crunch hasn't hit us like the rest o, f the country. We have been lucky about that many, many times. What's happening is that we are being nickled and dimed to death. Yes, people are still going out to eat, but not as much. Yes, people are still driving their SUVs, but less over the long haul. That adds up. I am sure that even as well as it's going there for Fox 41, you have employees having money issues. It's a slow thing that creeps up on yo, u. It's the death of the middle class. Odds are you make good six-figure salary, to boot. And I think it, 's great you make what you do. I'm sure you earned it. But for those stuck right in the middle -- working their hearts out and not gaining ground -- the world stops. Your head isn't in the sand. You just live in the wrong sandbox.
From: Travis - Louisville (4/3/08)
Just wanted to know: If the Little Leaguers have to pay their own electric bill to play night games, who is paying for the lights on the "Great Lawn" all night, every night?
From: Alexis (4/3/08) I am writing in regards to the Ford Plant. I know there is talk over whether or not the Ford Plant should remain open or be closed. My question is why doesn't the Kentucky State Highway Department use Ford trucks instead of Chevy or Dodge vehicles? That is one way I think that as a state we could and should show our support.
From: Roger - New Albany, Indiana (4/3/08) Is anyone else out there scratching their head wondering just what is in store for us if the gas companies can simply say their billions in profits are justified? This seems to be some odd way of diverting attention from the fact we are being gouged. Anyone remember when the conflict initially broke out and some local gas stations immediately and, in some case, outrageously, raised their prices? That was brought into line quickly, but that now appears to have been nothing but a tactical ploy, as the prices have steadily climbed back up with no relief in sight. And now, shortly after they say the billions are justified, prices jump another 20 cents plus a gallon. If we are not being gouged, is this to infer they have been making billions of dollars of profit annually? If so, for just how many years? And, gee, would we even still need foreign gasoline if these billions annually that have apparently been gasoline profits had been diverted to R&D for the electric line? We have often heard o, f families having to choose between health care and food, housing and education. What will we have left to "choose" between if gas companies continue to raise prices almost weekly? I think their billions in profit are ridiculous.
From: Jim - Louisville (4/1/08)
Major kudos to Mr. Lamb. He is right on again, and he is usually right. This time, vote the children out and send adults to Frankfort.
<, P>From: Isaiah - Louisville (4/1/08)
While cutting funding for universities across the state, did the Kentucky Legislature ever consider cutting off the prison system's cable? Do the prisoners really need to watch "The View" to help rehabilitate themselves? I miss the old idea: Prison is not supposed to be fun. Instead of providing entertainment for our prisoners, let's provide for our children's future.
From: Richard - St. Matthews (4/1/08)
Your clever upbraiding of the 2008 Kentucky legislative sessi, on was precisely on target! Regrettably, Sen. David Williams and Sen. D, an Kelly, control a misbegotten agenda that ignores dramatic needs of Kentuckians.
From: Daniel - Louisville (4/1/08)
What we have witnessed in Frankfort this week was "Political self-service" at its worst. I wonder how many of these elected officials campaigned on promises to go to Frankfort and "clean up the mess," but quickly forgot those promises and for whom they are supposed to be working. We have one individual who thinks he is Governor, and clearly does not think that the citizens of this state are capable of making a decision about casinos. He demonstrates on a daily basis that he does not care about the people of this state, and for that reason he should be voted out during the next election. Whatever happened to working as a team to solve our problems?
From: Linda - Chaplin, Kentucky (3/30/08)
Kentucky needs a "Government in the Sunshine" law. As a state employee, I can't really get the whole thing started, although I think I could lobby for it. But a news organization would be perfect for starting the trouble that would come from this. Not to mention it would be in your own best interest and a huge public service while you're at it. I cannot believe that S, peaker Richards actually had the nerve to close the budget meetings with no explanation and then come out and give a sound bite about how "it's just complex." Does he think the public is too stupid to understand the complexities of "We hand over our money and a bunch of guys in Frankfort - meeting in secret - and let them divvy it up?" I am so angry I could scream! Maybe I will start screaming: Kentucky needs a Government in the Sunshine law, Kentucky needs, a Government in the Sunshine law, Kentucky needs a Gover, nment in the Sunshine law... What can we do to, get that started?
From: Melissa - Louisville (3/28/08)
I want to nominate U of L for a laurel in your next "Darts and Laurels" segment, . The situation faced at the HealthCenter on Thursday, March 27, 2008, in hindsight, could have been the next campus massacre in the news. I was relieved to know alerts went out quickly (one was waiting on me as I walked into the lab on HSC) and that the situation was handled without injury. Hearing the rest of this story later that evening really brought it home that this was absolutely primed for tragedy had the Department of Public Safety at U of L not reacted and acted quickly.
From: Ivan - Elizabethtown (3/27/08) "Jessica's Law" is a law in the name of Jessica Marie Lunsford. It's active in 33 states, but it needs to be active here and in the other remaining states. It will give child sex offenders a minimum of 25 years to life. My only hope is that you will help to get it put into law here.
From: Eric - Seymour, Indiana (3/27/08)
While the government is bailing things out, why doesn't someone ask if Social Security can be bailed out with some of the funds? We could spend one-fifth of the money that goes to war on Social Security -- if five billion currently goes to fund the war, we'd put one billion of that money into Social Security and Medicaid instead. If that were done, who knows? The funding for all three might work.
From: Joy - Louisville (3/25/08)
All Easter weekend , long, we heard radio voices weighing in on Obama. How do white people feel about his blackness? How do black people feel about his whiteness? Absent from the discussion is any awareness of what he's actually done. Where has he landed his punches? During Obama's brief political career thus far, what issues has he acted on? Much has been made of his pastor's disparaging comments about America and 9/11. So has Mr. Obama spent his young senate days hanging with the fringe wing of the Democratic Party that pushes 9/11 conspiracy theories? Has he lent his voice to the view that 9/11 was America's just comeuppance? No. If anything, Mr. Obama was a bit timid as a young senator, watching in dismay as his idealistic bits of legislation got watered down over time. Obama himself is a bit of a Rorschach test, in that com, mentators superimpose on him what they think should be there. For this reason, Obama is often linked to Black Liberation , Theology. This is silly, because he was never a radical. In his youth, he never went through a Chicago Seven phase -- all fist-pumping, Bobby Seale haircuts and incendiary speeches. If anything, Obama was an eager but cautious Harvard law student with an eye on social justice issues, but apt to keep his options open. Not "options open" in a cynical sense, not soft-peddling his views, but rather living according to a belief that brash, extreme opinions only alienate those who might otherwise be your allies. Like many young black leaders, Obama saw the limitations of racially-charged politics and the futility of replacing one racial stereotype with another. Thus, he would find ways to discuss inflammatory issues in reasonable, nuanced tones. &n, bsp; It looks like this year America has a candidate that prefers to shed light, rather than heat. Are we up for it? If Obama loses, it won't be because he's black. It'll be because America's not ready for a President that talks to you as if you have a brain. ,
From: Kelly - Louisville (3/25/08)
I have a thought about how to increase revenue for KY. Instead of taxing small groups of people like smokers or drinkers, why don't they do something that taxes everyone? All they would have to do is raise the sales tax from 6% to 7%. This tax would be fair for everyone in Kentucky.
From: Jim - Louisville (3/24/08) If Caesars Casino claimed to have moved to smaller offices so they could pay out more to their customers and they had not, I am guessing you guys would be all over them. So why is the Kentucky Lottery running commercials that promote gambling by saying they moved to a van so they could pay out , more any different? As a matter of fact, it is nothing more than government competing with private business, i.e., casinos and horse racing. So why does the Lottery get a pass on its commercials?
From: Tony - Louisville (3/19/08) While I agree it was a shame the SEC did not fill those seats, one must ask how they would have determined who was going to get in and who wasn't. A lottery? First come, first serve? This in itself would have likely caused a riot. I feel the SEC thought about this, and I applaud them for not putting money over the possible issues caused with trying to fill the area with only select fans.
From: Lois - Sonora, Kentucky (3/18/08)
I'm getting sick and tired of the officials in Louisville and Kentucky talking about the budget cuts. I think it is awful to cut education, ambulance service and other necessary services. I would not want to live in Louis, ville, have a heart attack and have no ambulance to get me to the hospital. The affluent don't have to worry about tha, t because they h, ave the power to call someone and get help but that's not true for the average "Joe" or "Joanne." I know a lot of the hype is because this is election year and then once the people are elected, it'll be all "tu, rned around" and they will be crowing "Look what I've done, we have money, the budget is on track," etc. However, if the city and state are in the financial trouble that they want the people of this state and the city to think, then why on earth are they still committing over 300 million dollars to build that stupid arena that probably only maybe ¼ of the people of Kentucky will ever be inside, yet we're paying for it? I know I'll have no need to ever go there and I've heard many other people make the same comment. If the people of KY are going to have to pay for something, I think we should have had some say in it -- and not just through the elected officials that will no doubt get their pockets fattened by it and receive box seat tickets to everything that may be held there. Then there is the museum that the mayor is trying so hard to get through. What good are these things if the people have no money left to go to any of the sites? How many homeless and truly needy people would these two things alone support? What about insurance and some relief for the elderly who don't always even have enough money to go to the doctor when they are sick? How many of them will ever visit the arena or the museum? Have the elected officials forgotten the meaning of humanity? Do they have the mindset that it's always just "give me, give me, give me" with their hands out? I think this is the most ridiculous thing that has taken place in this state for many years that involve tax dollars, and we can all thank former Governor Fletcher for a lot of this. Of course, as he's from Louisville, he wanted to make a big show for the city. Lots of ridiculous things take place in the government, but this is the largest waste of good money I've known in my 60 plus ye, ars. (Editor's note: Contrary to the author's statement, former Governor Fletcher is not from Louisville.)
From: Debbie - Shepherdsville (
It makes me sick that people get screwed everyday when they purchase new vehicles, and used ones as well. I bought a new Mustang a few years back, and as soon as I got home I noticed they had placed a sticker on the back of my new car with the dealership's name and city. That really ticked me off. They throw in every little , thing they ca, n charge for when you buy the vehicles and yet force me to provide FREE advertising for them for the entire time I own the vehicle. If you look, almost all vehicles have the name of the dealership it was purchased from, and they get higher and higher on prices while I GET NOTHING! I do not recall agreeing to provide free advertising to the car lot, and they sure are no, t sending me a check every month for advertising. I feel it should be the customer who decides if the stickers and name plates of dealerships should be placed on the vehicle when purchased. Furthermore, the dealerships should make arrangements for a discount or a monthly check issued for advertising. I run a wrecker business in Shepherdsville and no one gives me free advertising other than word of mouth. I do not go around sticking my business name on other people's property. This is just another way the auto dealerships are ripping off the American people.
From: Richard - Louisville (3/16/08)
I think this cigarette tax is unjust. The government is depending on the smokers to relieve the debt, and we are being singled out. What about alcohol? Maybe non-smokers should have to pay a fee to eat at a smoke-free restaurant or bar. So the smokers are good enough to pay the debt for all, but aren't allowed to smoke in any facility? Sounds like government discrimination to me.
From: Bob - Louisville (3/14/08)
, Br, idges move people faster? Toll = stop. How many toll lanes do you need to keep two lanes of 65 mph traffic moving? How wide is a road with six lanes? 75 feet? Eight tollbooths = 100 feet. Ten tollbooths = 125 feet. &, nbsp; Two points: 1) The Great Green Lawn will not be green under concrete. 2) The working man and poor people will get taxed again.
From: J.P. - Louisville (3/14/08)
Why is it that every time Kentucky has the need to generate more revenue, you and every other self proclaimed do-gooder want to throw it all on the backside of the smoker? Maybe I over-simplify the solution, but why don't we simply raise sales tax? Seems to me that by raising the sales tax as a temporary solution, the state could pull itself out of the hole quickly, and then when the economy recovers, lower the tax down to the 6%, we are used to. Maybe I'm the only person who thinks this way, but when the whole state has a revenue problem, the whole state should pay the bill.
From: Donnie - Valley Station, Kentucky (3/13/08)
I agree with everything you said except for the rise in the cigarette tax. I believe setti, ng our education system finances around a tax on cigarettes is sending the wrong message to the community and is a bad example from the government.
What is the state going to do w, hen we all start to get our cigarettes:
A. From another state (i.e. Indiana)?
B. From a black market on cigarettes? Nobody seems to accept that this is happening in our community as we speak. And yes, I can get a carton for ten dollars at the end of the street in all actuality.
I think it causes more problems for our community, our kids and others we love. Smoking is bad for us, and I wish I could quit -- I really do (I don't smoke around my kids or in my home.)
What message are we sending to our kids as they grow older and find out the money u, sed for their education came from the very products that killed their parents?
On another note, when the mon, ey runs out due to high prices on c, igarettes, where would the money come from then? Would we have to raise taxes on cigarettes , again, or maybe somewhere else due to the program becoming dependent on the cigarette tax?
From: Cheryl - Louisville (3/13/08)
My heart goes out to the family that has lost a son, and a father. I am overwhelmed with sadness. This is one time I feel I must speak out. I think our police have gone overboard. Where is the training? Is that what they are taught -- shoot first, ask questions later? I'm in agreement with the fact that the police had no way of knowing if the gun was real or if the suspect intended to fire it. But since he did not shoot the officer that had chased him on foot, one could assume he would not fire on nine police officers who had him surrounded. I am not an expert in these matters and I don't claim to be, but I feel excessive force was used in this particular case. Take a long hard look at that car -- is it dead yet? Why on earth do they get a paid leave of absence for killing another human being? Oh, that's where "innocent until proven guilty" comes into play. What about the suspect? That is a little one sided, I think. Why can&#, 39;t they perform a desk job or other civic duty while undergoing an investigation? Maybe it would help decrease some of our budget problems. How much do you think those 50 or so bullets cost? Again, my sympathy goes out to, the fatherless children left behind.
From: Jim - Louisville (
I retired from the Louisville Police Department after over 20 years. I absolutely disagree with your comment concerning the over-reaction of the officers in the recent "suicide by cop" situation. On m, ore than one occasion I could have opened fire, but instead held off to be absolutely sure of the situation. By doing so, I among oth, er things, did not kill a five year-old child. Look at the pictures from the scene. The number of shots fired was way over anything reasonable. Several shots hit one of the police cars. I remember the rookie who admitted to me that on a shoot-out he became fascinated with the red and blue strobe lights reflecting off the brass being ejected from his pistol and has no idea where the shots went! It's not just LMPD officers that react this way. Even our military now carries fully automatic weapons. The attitude is simply "spray the area, you might hit something." Finally I suggest you check out the very real activity I referred to at the beginning of this. Suicide-by-cop is becoming even more prevalent. Remember, the last individual shot by LMPD was carrying an air gun and his own family said he wanted to be killed. , ; What is, in my opinion, needed is better firearms training along with the realization that this is not (in your words) the "Wild West." A second or two of hesitation can make things look much better.
From: Melinda - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (3/12/08) ,
With so much talk lately of a new increase tax on cigarettes, let's put a tax on alcohol as well. I do not drink or smoke, but would love to see an increase on taxes for alcohol. So many people are killed every year from drunk driving. Let's make it a little more costly to them to afford the alcohol. It's amazing that you never hear of doing anything like this. And now with the huge rise in gas prices, they want to tax gas as well. Let's really stick it to alcohol and get the tax money from there.
From: Kevin - Louisville (3/11/08)
Perhaps a significant number of voters were bothered with the corruption of Ernie Fletcher's administration when they voted "for" Steve Beshear. Don't overestimate the gambling issue. Beshear benefited from a lot of negativity surrounding Fletcher. Midway through the campaign, Fletcher tried to ride the anti-casino horse. Of course, that co, uld not overcome his image as a corrupt governor.
From: Carl and Steph - Louisville (3/11/08)
,
Beshear was elected as a vote against Fletcher -- not as a casino savior as Bill Lamb makes it sound. I want 'my' legislators to have the guts to stand the moral ground against casinos. Legislators are supposed to represent the people that contact them on issues and not be lemmings for a governor that gets into office misrepresenting himself and lying about his opponent. , I do , not , want a bunch of 'yes, men' in office. I want representatives with integrity and character that understand casinos are bad for Kentucky, and that's why a hundred years ago they were made unconstitutional and are still bad today. I get so tired of hearing how things should be put up for a vote, but I never hear anyone on explain the details on TV to voters so we may have an informed vote. I want to have a say in Kentucky government. I don't want to watch a few millionaire casino lords have our officials in their wallets and running all of government. The lottery didn't come through for us, and neither would the casinos.
From: Stan - Louisville (3/11/08),
Is Bill lamb silly or stupid? Does he know that Beshear was not elected? That the reason Beshear is the governor is that Ernie was voted out? Beshear won because he was the only other choice. We Republicans elected Fletch beca, use of the vile creep that the last governor turned out to be.
I voted Democrat for the first time in m, y life. I am 56. Does Bill know the difference between the executive and legislative branches? The promise to get gaming looked at is all that the governor has to do. It is up to the people of the state to contact their representatives to get gaming on the ballot.
Does he know that the executive doesn't make law -- he only agrees with it or vetoes it?
Ernie Fletcher promised to return honor with respect to our beloved Commo, nwealth. Instead, the first thing he did , was to dishonor it.
Why doesn't Bill do a story about the corruption and lies that get these people thrown out of our most respected offices because they think they are untouchable after they violate our trust because they are already in their office? (Take New Yo, rk's governor as an example.)
Here is something the people of this state would like for your powerful media to promote: Loser pays. I am sick of law enforcement being sued for doing their job. If these good kids (the ones that the police have to use force on to arrest) had their rap sheet read before the story of their apprehension was told, the public would not call for an investigation of police excesses. And as a result, payoff awards to make it go away would diminish, as well.
From: Mark - Louisville (3/7/08) The decision about making officers pay to , use their cruisers off duty is, in my opinion, a big mistake. By allowing officers to use their cruiser "fee-free," it puts more of a police presence on the streets. If an officer is made to pay for his cruiser off-duty and comes across an accident or someone in distress, or driving dangerously while off duty, he would be less inclined to stop or call it in. On the other hand, if he had access to his car 24-7, he would not have to think about his decision. I hope the mayor reconsiders this fee he is proposing, and continues to let the officers of LMPD use their cruisers 24-7, whether they are off or on the clock.
From: Bill - Louisville (3/7/08) ,
,
Cell phones are an accident waiting to happen on the roadways and should be outlawed, but that's not my gripe. My gripe is with these young drivers who recline their driver seats back to where they can't possibly see the roadway. This has got to be a hazard, and should be stopped by LMPD. You know yourself that half of these younger drivers don't carry insurance. This is not to say they can't drive, but that they're practically lying down when they drive.
From: Jim - Mitchell, Indiana (3/6/08)
I see a problem with Indiana residents being asked to fund half of the bill for these two bridges, and then having to pay a toll to Kentucky to use the bridges. If I'm not mistaken, doesn't Kentucky claim that the river is in Kentucky, hence the need to have a Kentucky fishing license to fish from a boat in the river? You can't have it both ways, Kentucky. Indiana shouldn't have to help fund the bridges or they shouldn't have to pay a toll to use them. Or, at least half of the toll money should go to Indiana. We all know that tolls never go away.
From: Bill - Louisville (3/5/08)
I disagree with your editorial supporting building the bridges with tolls under certain conditions. The bridges will be needed, but should not be funded with tolls. How many of th, e bridges in Northern Kentucky were funded by tolls? Why just our , bridges? How do you think the legislature would feel about putting tolls on all Ohio River bridges in Kentucky to pay for these new bridges? It is unfair to put the new bridge burden on our area alone. Fortunately, I don't think tolls are necessary. The new gambling revenues from JeffersonCounty (and probably a wider area) casinos and tracks should be dedicated to the bridges. Indiana is paying for their share of the bridges, but apparently our legislature expects Indiana residents to pay a toll to come to Kentucky casinos so that we can get even more revenue from them. The "let them vote" slogan about casino gambling is worthless unless the voters get to decide how the money is spent. Anyone who has lived in Kentucky for any length of time knows that they are "letting us vote" only because the constitution forces them to get our agreement. And, they are keeping all to themselves the decision that really matters, which is: "Who gets the money?" The legislators and their interest groups are already fighting in Frankfort like a bunch of h, yenas over a carcass, just from a sniff of future revenues. We voters are selling ourselves way short if we take all the problems that come with gambling without making sure we get the benefits. We voters must demand from our legislators that the vote includes how the money is spent, and we must tell them we will vote "no" unless the ballot spells out very clearly that it is a local voter option where the revenues go. It should all go to the bridges. No tolls!
From: Josh - Southern Indiana (3/4/08)
I am not from Kentucky, but I am currently a LawSchool student at U of L. I feel that Governor Beshear's plan to cut the higher education budget so drastically is an extremely detrimental mistake. The Governor is cutting money from one of the areas that need it most, and which wil, l benefit the state in the long run (and in the short run for that matter). I know that since hearing the unfortunate news, I no longer plan on remaining in the Kentucky area upon graduation. I would not feel right contributing to a state's economy that took upward, s of 25 million dollars away from students that worked so hard to make something of themselves. What's worse is that they are taking funds away from the very institutions that are shaping our future leaders. Though I am temporarily living across the river in Southern Indiana, I probably contribute more to the Kentucky economy than that of Indiana, and my wife works as a nurse in Louisville. Although I am not well versed in local politics (not having lived here long), I can recognize a terrible decision when I see one. Thank you for allowing me to sound off.
From: Stephanie - Louisville (3/2/08)
I am a 4th grade teacher in JCPS. I appreciated your thoughts on eliminating the portfolio component of the CATS test. Your opinion is a popular one, of those not daily affected by this, and I am glad I have the , opportunity to speak on it. I could not agree more that writing is an ESSENTIAL skill. I liked that you said, "Too many well-educated people simply can't spell, properly punctuate or make a subject and verb agree." However, let me give you the reality of the situation as I have experienced it for many years. The portfolio is based on , writing a piece of a certain genre, i.e., persuasive letter, memoir, poem, etc. Because of the complexity of each of these genres, the time constraints, and the developmental ability of nine- and ten-year olds, the majority of our time is spent teaching the, m how to write these genres -- not on the grammar that you me, ntion. It INFURIATES me that so much time is devoted to writing specific genres, none of which they will probably use in real life. Many say the grammar issues can be "embedded" into your writing instruction, but try as I may, the time is not always there. Therefore, by 4th grade many students are familiar with the characteristics of a genre of writing, but they can't spell or punctuate. In summation, I think we need to develop a writing curriculum that teaches students the traits of writing, such as sentence fluency and word choice, and not focus so much attention on specific genres. To me, the on-demand writing that other grades use makes MUCH more sense. Students need to be held accountable for their writing ski, lls. Getting rid of the portfolio portion would NOT de-emphasize writing. Instead, it would give teachers the opportunities to teach the essential skills needed in real world writing rather than teaching how to write a memoir -- something they will probably never do again. We are currently emphasizing the wrong thing. Thank you again for voicing your point of view.
From: Sue - Louisville (2/29/08)
Mr. Lamb is correct once again. Schools need to be more concerned with grammar, spelling and vocabulary. However, in my experience, the CATS testing has not helped in that area. Teachers are pressured to raise the CATS score to benefit the school, while we all know that it is more impor, tant to teach to benefit the students. My daughter graduated in 2003. Her portfolio included creative writing pieces. The teachers assured me misspellings or sentence structure would have no effect on an otherwise Proficient rating. That's unbelievable! I have received emails and letters from people who have college degrees. Some of the emails are unintelligible. Without good commun, ication skills, both verbal and written, misunderstandings often take place. Well-written documents are taken more seriously, are easier for the reader to understand and are less prone to be misconstrued. I'm amazed at the careless attitude toward the English language. I hope this isn't a growing trend or, soon, we'll all be grunting and pointing to get our point across!
From: Rachel - Louisville (2/29/08)
Before asserting your opinion on JCPS's writing portfolios, I would suggest you do the proper research. If you would have spoken to any JCPS teacher, they would have informed you that the writing portfolio actually prevents most teachers from teaching the very basics of writing. The portfolio does not teach grammar at all. We are forced to have students "create" writing pieces based on other pieces of literature, their feelings, and examples of person narratives. The most asked question during writing portfolio time is, "How did that make you feel?" We are constantly struggling to find the time to teach basic writing skills and spelling because the wri, ting portfolio dominates a lot of time that could be better spent teaching these skills.
I think those in charge should talk to the people most involved with testing and portfolios (the teachers) before they make a decision on their worth. Please spend time in a JCPS classroom before giving an opinion.
From: Deanna - Shepherdsville, Kentucky (2/29/08)
As a teacher, I have mixed feelings about the removal of the accountability testing. Before becoming a teacher I worked for a small company downtown and served in the military. I served as a PTA president and on a SBDM council as a parent representative. I have also graded the CATS tests. I see both good and bad in the system., Currently the system has no impact on the students themselves, and that, I feel, is the root of the problem. I graded many tests where the open response answers did not address the question, but rather included silly comments such as "This test is stupid," "I refuse to answer" and "This sucks and I'm not doing it". This was mostly at the high school level, but a few at , the middle school level. Since this becomes a zero on the grading scale, it hurts the school but not the student, and no one wins. Schools try to teach the stand, ards upon which the students will be tested, but when the amount of money your school receives and even your job could be on the line, teachers and schools are going to focus on the test. As for portfolios, it would be nice for writing to continue to be a focus. However, if the students are not taught grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, how can they be held accountable for it? Several school districts have done, away with spelling tests, and there are few to no standards that address grammar and sentence structure. No English or Language Arts teacher diagrams sentences anymore. They have too many other things they have to teach and grammar is not one that is required. Let's make changes, not only to testing, but to what is expected of our students and teachers. Don't make testing a "high stakes" issue, but rather a tool to help develop both students and teachers.
From: Melissa - Louisville (2/28/08)
I'm hearing a lot about taxing the smokers -- as we usually do when belts are tightened. It comes up often enough that I'v, e, learned to ignore it by now. This morning however, I got a glimpse of yet another endeavor to tax smokers. The claim was made that it would also help deter smokers. That, makes no sense! In essence, they want to tax a group, but they want that group to no longer use the item being taxed, thereby not generating any real added revenue so the problem will still persist? Let's call this what it truly is: yet another effort to snub out smokers and their rights.
From: Craig - Louisville (2/28/08)
I think we should just build a bridge strong enough to hold horses and carriages. With rising fuel costs, who can afford to drive anywhere? That's one lane for horses and another for the asses that make the decisions around here. Scrap the whole bridges project and come up with a plan for more public transportation, such as a monorail electric train that circles Louisville and Southern , Indiana that will provide futuristic expansion, low cost transportation, diversion of traffic and pollution, and allow us to grow as a city. Just make sure it is built out of stainless steel, so we are not held to the gun by some over-priced painter 50 years from now. I could ha, ve dismantled the KennedyBridge piece by piece and shipped it off to be rhino lined with gold leaf for what was paid -- although red masking tape is very expensive. And we wonder why are city is under budget by nine million.
From: Lynn - Louisville (2/27/08)
I don't approve of Congress getting involved in the use of steroids in baseball. I don't see where this is any business of the U.S. Congress. Shouldn't Congress be concerned with running the country and leave the running of baseball up to the Commissioner? If the use of steroids is illegal or against the league rules, then there are avenues to handle that. In short I would like to see Congress get down to the business of efficiently running the country and stay out of sports. I think they are wasting the good tax money that pays their salaries.
From: Eileen - New Albany, Indiana (2/27/08)
As someone who has had experience with toll roads, I can only say I wish they'd come up with some other way of paying for them. It is a very frustrating way to have to commute. We need thi, ngs that will expedite traffic -- n, ot slow it down. It's bad enough trying to get to Louisville on I-65 South at peak time. I can only imagine it with toll booths!
From: Donald - Louisville (2/27/08)
I know this will never happen because it makes too much sense, and this city is famous for making blundering mistakes. But if there isn't enough money to build two bridges, why not scale back the project and begin with one bridge? That way, the toll they are inevitably going to place on all the bridges will lower and the strain on the already over-taxed people of the city and surrounding areas will be reduced. When the tolls have finally paid for one bridge, keep the tolls until there is more than enough money to pay for the second bridge and the maintenance and upkeep on all the brid, ges for a reasonable amount of time. After that, keep the , tolls and throw the cigarette tax out the window. Do the people running this state really want to lose revenues from Kentucky's largest cash crop? Please don't misunderstand -- I don't think it should cost $2 to c, ross any of the bridges. The toll should be no more than 75 cents, and Thunder alone should put a big dent in the cost of building one bridge.
From: Steve - Shelbyville, Kentucky (2/27/08)
History has shown that once a toll is started, it never stops. Once a "temporary" tax or fee is initiated, there is never an end in sight. Once government gets its hands on your money through a new tax or fee, they don't let go and will c, ontinually spend it before they get it. This type of accounting assures that there is a continual "need" for that tax or fee. Check the history of the toll road in northern Indiana or the one in Pennsylvania, as just two examples. They were "temporary" to pay for their construction. They've been paid for many times over.
From: Anna - Jeffersonville, Indiana (2/26/08)
While I know the bridges need funding and Kentucky is saying they can't afford them, I'm not sure the tolls are the answer. I have lived in both Chicago and LA, and, I can say tolls are annoying and people will avoid them. I really think if Louisville tries to go the way of the tolls, the local economy will suffer. My husband commutes f, rom Jeffersonville to downtown Louisville every day to work. We can't afford tolls on top of everything else! As for your suggestion of a tier price, if out-of-towners are charged a higher toll, then I think the economy will run the risk of suffering this way too. Conventions will choose more friendly places because they will consider the tolls. People traveling through will note the new tolls, and instead of driving through and giving the area some business, they will drive , around Louisville all together. So we'll lose either way. There is no way tolls should be put on the current bridges because those are paid for. Tolls are only to pay for the bridge. There needs to be a way to "choose" the tolls, and honestly, I can say I will most likely avoid them because I can't afford another bill. I hope Kentucky gets its act together and figures out a way. They have money for an arena, but not money for roads? It&#, 39;s all about priorities. I do commend you for bringing the subje, ct out though.
From: Delta - Louisville (2/26/08)
The main reason for the new bridge in downtown Louisville was to relieve traffic congestion. Do you think adding a toll bridge will relieve or increase traffic congestion? To relieve congestion, we plan to build a new bridge, but to pay for the bridge we plan to apply a toll that will increase, congestion. Education is a very important tool for success in today's world. Maybe some of the elected officials in Louisville should consider some refresher courses before wasting taxpayers' money during a recession and increasing the current traffic problem. This is an economic disaster.
From: Tony - New Albany, Indiana (2/25/08)
I agree that the Courier-Journal is biased towards the Democratic Party. Why do they not give equal time to the Republican Party? They only give the Republicans token lip service. I am a Hoosier, but I must admit that Kentucky's strongest asset in Washington is Senator Mitch McConnell. When he leaves office, Kentucky will again become a minor player in national politics.
From: Sam - Louisville (2/20/08)
In your editorial about casino gambling, you said, "But if our legislature has the will and the wisdom to make those changes in the next few weeks, it can still turn out to be a winner." Talk about an "oxymoron." You used "will," "wisdom" and "Kentucky legislature" in the same sentence! Gambling? Let us ignorant voters decide!
From: Dan - Southern Indiana (2/19/08)
I find it hard to stomach that there is such a big debate over casinos in Kentucky. There are so many other ways for a state to raise revenues that are much more palpable to the genera, l populace. Kentucky has managed to exist for many years without casinos, and to just "jum, p off a cliff" because all the other states are doing it is simply preposterous.
From what I see on TV, the debate doesn't seem to be a so much a matter of 'if' anymore but 'where and how.' Meanwhile, there are protests in neighborhoods and precincts over liquor sales, nude dancing establishments, and smoking in public areas, .
Casinos would s, urely bring as much, and probably more, of the proble, ms and questionably moral improprieties -- more public intoxication and drunk drivers, more prostitution, more trash in general. Yet some would have everyone believe that all this is OK because casinos will raise the state's revenues and boost the overall
economy. Well I say horse feathers! Kentucky doesn't need to compete with other states by sinking to their , level. There are tons of ways to attract people to Kentucky without casinos, and it's time that the citizens and those in power start thinking about the state they will someday leave to their children and grandchildren. Will you leave
them a beautiful and respectable state or a trashy, crime-ridden get-rich-quick sta, , te?
Think about it.
From: Don - Georgetown, Indiana (2/18/08)
How stupid can IndianaUniversity be? The same guy who hired Coach Sampson is going to do the investigation again. Greenspan was the one who headed up the inve, stigation when Sampson was at Oklahoma and saw nothing wrong. This is like having a crime boss be appointed chief of police and then the chief investigates the department for corruption. The problem is with the man doing the hiring more than the man they hired. Sampson', s past was known a long time ago. What about the "No tolerance" policy that was put on Coach Knight when all he, did was ask respect from a student -- not put the whole basketball program and university in jeopard, y?
From: Douglas - Louisville (2/14/08)
I am trying to find out why our elected officials in Congress are investigating Roger Clements and Major League Baseball for steroid use. Is this truly the people's concern? With our country at war, 47 million U.S. citizens (12 million children) without health insurance, a dollar that is worth less every day, gasoline at an all time high and home foreclosures at their highest, does Congress not have enough to do? I am just a simple man, but it just seems to me if Congress is bored and looking for something to do, why not work on something that is a concern to all of us? And besides, I am sure Mr. Clement, s has health insurance. What is next, should we investigate Britney too? All I want is an answer.
From: James - Louisville (2/13/08)
Is the Metro Government really concerned about the welfare of its citizens? I think not. I hav, e been delivering mail in the downtown area for four years now, and every time it snows, the city sidewalks throughout the downtown area are never cleaned. Just drive around the area and you will see people having to walk in traffic due to this problem. I guess it's like everything else -- no one will react until someone sues the city and wins. What is the policy for snow removal and why isn't it enforced? Today, I thought I broke m, y back while trying to deliver the mail along East Broadway, East Muhammad Ali Boulevard and many other streets in this city. I called 311 and tried to speak with my Councilperson on this matter, and still -- as of 18:46 hours -- have yet to have someone return my call. Again, I guess it will take me to file a workman's comp suit against the city for lost wages in order to get a response. Will the Mayor or his counsel care? Probably not, because they are more worried about thinking of ways to, tax us and spend our tax money on things like arenas, and deciding where someone can smoke. How about some thought about and care for this city's people, who have to use the sidewalks for work as well as pleasure every day?
From: Bill - Louisville (2/13/08)
I am of the opinion that the Curious Jumble (or the Courier-Journal for those who prefer) has no editorial stance. They g, o with the wind, hope and prayer of their editoria, l board. Now, if we could just determine which one of Gannett's offices around the country houses this editorial board, maybe we could determine which way the wind would blow to Louisville. It's unfortunate that Louisville, being the "world class" city it is striving to become, does not have a better source for the written word than the huddled mess at the corner of 6th and Broadway. Where's Henry Watterson when we need him?
From: Connie - Louisville (2/12/08)
What good does it do to have "the third most powerful man in the party" if he doesn't bother to go and vote unless he is approving whatever Bush wants passed? Check out Mitch McConnell's voting record: On healthcare issues he's a non-voter (except to approve Bush's recent extensive healthcare budget cuts). On anything that doesn't pretty much follow the Republican party line, he doesn't vote. On anything controversial, he doesn't vote. Of course he , is going to vote for a tax cut and publicize it, because it might win him some votes from those who don't realize that the tax cuts of today will go onto the multi billion-dollar deficit or be cut from other needed programs like Medicaid, children's healthcare programs and medical education programs. Oh, that's right; he doesn't have to worry about healthcare because as a Senat, or, he has free insurance for the rest of his life, paid for by the taxpayers of the United States. Would I want a rookie instead of a "powerful" Congressman seeing to Kentucky's interests? Yes, if the rookie is a stand-up guy (or gal) who doesn't hold himself up as "taking care of Kentucky" with one breath and then decrying "earmarks" in the federal budget in the next. Where do people think the funds come from? Mitch McConnell is first, last and foremost a politician. He seems to care a whole h--- of a lot more about st, aying in office and being a powerful icon in the Republican party than he does about the local, state or national iss, ues. And I do not subscribe to the Courier-Journal, but I will most definitely vote with them.
From: Nolan - Louisville (2/10/08)
I think that smokers don't realize the impact they have on others and the environment. With alcohol, you can damage your body or even hurt, others with drinking and driving. But alcohol doesn't effect our environment like smoking does. What smoking causes is a cloudy environment and damages the air quality. Maybe with more taxes there will be less smoking and a slight improvement in the air that everyone breathes.
From: Jason - Louisville (2/8/08)
After hearing of the Mayor's plan to alleviate our local go, vernment from an "unforeseen" budget deficit, I was deeply concerned over the reduction in services and the lack of explanation for such deficit. First of all, I would like you to request and publicly explain the actual calculations for the deficit, showing the calculations for projected revenue and what areas have fallen short of projections. Second, the budgets for public services were calculated by each department head and money appropriated to finance those departments. If a department ha, s gone over budget, some habitually, questions should be raised as to why they are unable to meet their budget. If public services are in-line with budgets, why would we reduce services? Personnel costs affect budgets more than any other expense, and are often an easy target for budget reductions. But when your personal budget is tight, you stop going to the movies; you don't cancel the garbage pick-up. EMS has "dynamic staffing" -- magic words that mean they don't have to staff a minimum number of ambulances. Reducing ambulances reduces the ability to take people to the hospital. Having fly cars or other staff cars makes numbers look good, but they don't transport. Maintaining minimum staffing in ambulances is important. Make changes in the departments, that cannot stay within budget, leave the others alone, and hold departments accountable. I have a suggestion for debt reduction. The Metro Police Department is the only department to allow their employees to use department vehicles, uniforms, and fuel for gainful employment off-duty. Officers are individual contractors, so to speak, that are hired by the Louisville Water Company, other utilities, and private businesses to provide traffic control and , a police presence. The city is burdened by this expense with no reward. Conversely, the Louisville Fire Department provides CPR classes to the community by paying overtime to teach the classes and the department charges enough to actually make a profit, generating over $180,000 a year in revenue. Applying this principle, no LMPD officer would be allowed to use their vehicle, uniform or fuel for off-duty gainful employment. In return, agencies and businesses would call LMPD and request an officer/patrol car for scheduled events or traffic control, . The city would charge enough to cover its expense (overtime for officers and fuel) and make a small , profit. Revenue would flow in and ex, penses would be dramatically reduced. The other option, in addition to regulating off-duty jobs, is to park the police cars and not allow take home cars. This is drastic, but does not reduce services. The LMPD fleet would be reduced and backup cars would be abundant. Fuel costs would be cut in half and costs reduced on maintenance and replacement. LMPD officers use their cars for personal use and do not conduct law enforcement off-duty. Police cars drive by car wrecks and do not stop while off-duty. This is no, t popular, but let's cut back where the fat is thick instead of hurting vital services to this community.
From: Carroll - Shelbyville, Kentucky (2/8/08)
When our politicians say they want to reduce smoking in Kentucky, I don't believe a word of it. They want the tax money. Tobacco brings in millions of tax dollars. 30% of the people in Kentuc, ky smoke. The average smoker pays approximately $600 in cigarette taxes each year. &, nbsp; We don't want to tax cigarettes to death. If we do, then the rest of us will have to make up for the loss.
From: Don - Louisville (2/7/08)
I am a one year ex-smoker who enjoys an oc, casional cigar. However, I believe I would have quit a lot sooner if they would have raised taxes on cigarettes. So I say ra, ise the heck out of the tax on cigarettes to the percentage of the alcohol tax, and if you want to smoke and drink, you pay through the nose for it!
From: Raymond - Louisville (2/6/08)
I've just read replies to your editorial. It is really what the mass of people think --which is different from the upper ten percent.
I've heard that gasoline taxes go into the general fund. I believe the intent was for roads and bridges. As for smoking, I quit twelve years ago. For a grea, t number of people, this is their affordable luxury. The well-to-do can afford an increase in taxes. They can also afford other mind-altering substances.
Although I'm a former right winger, I can relate to this group - that's the least able to afford to carry the cost of health care for others -- feeling that they're being taken advantage of.
Actually, I don't care about second hand smoke. If I am that weak, I need to pass on.
There is so much abuse in government hand-out programs, this should be addressed.
From: John - Louisville (2/6/08)
Why don't we go back to taxing all groceries and food? Don't we all eat? And some too much? Maybe this tax will satisfy everybody. Heck, everybody will have to pay it. What's wrong with this idea? Too simple?
From: Nick - Louisville (2/5/08)
I don't understand why oil companies are making so much extra profit and we are still paying s, o much for gas. From my point of view, I th, ink some of that profit should go back to consumers.
From: Murry - St. Matthews, Kentucky (2/5/08)
I don't know if the service I am about to mention would be covered as a public service, but it is something that "gets my goat" every January. It's the school tax. Every year when I receive my JeffersonCounty property tax bill for my home, I see that almost two-thirds of the levied tax is for schools in JeffersonCounty. What gets me though, is that I don't have any children, and I don't plan on ever, having children. I like children, they're just not for me. So why must I continue to pay school taxes year after year? I'm not presently receiving any benefit from sending another person's child to school. Additionally, Kentucky and Louisville are one of t, he lowest ranked educators in the nation. Why should I pay for poor performance? My parents sent me to private school. Not because they could afford it. They couldn't really, but they did it to ensure that I receiv, ed the best education they could provide for me. My parents made a lot of sacrifices to send me to private school, and still had to pay the school tax each year. What I'd like to see is the school tax eliminated. I'd like to see every parent responsible for their own children's education. Perhaps with the funds coming out of their pockets, parents would hold their children and the school system account, able for their lack of progress, instead of looking at it as a public-funded day care service. I don't mean to sound rash, and I'm sure many educators do their best to teach children, but at whose expense? Those who really can't afford to send their children to private school and still pay the school tax. And those who have no children at all - for , whatever reason.
From Gayle - Pendleton, , Kentucky (2/5/08)
In your point of view. you say pick something we can do without. If it were thoroughly investigated, I'm sure we could find plenty. If the government waste were stopped we could cut taxes. We could hire and pay someone to run watchdog and still come out ahead. Of course, you would have to hire someone new about every two years because they would be corrupt by then.
From: Clyde - Louisville (2/5/08) T
here are so many things that some people can, and can't, live without. I wish there was a way to choose where your tax doll, ars go. For instance, I drive a car. So I would choose for my dollars to go for bridges, and roads to be repaired. Things like schools, or museums that I'm not going to use since I don't have kids, wouldn't be a priority for me. This is an example, and shouldn't be taken as a criticism of schools or museums. There would be some givens, such as police, fire, and public transportation, which you couldn't opt out of. So many people are down on so many things because they pay the taxes for them, but do not get any benefit from them. I think more people would feel better about taxes if they were getting use out of what they were being taxed for.
From: Shelly - Fairdale, Kentucky (2/2/08)
I think this smoking tax is not right. This government is discriminating against smokers. Heck, you can't smoke in bars, which is no, t right. What happened to the land of the free? It is land of th, e laws and taxes. If we want to smoke, that is our problem. And no law or tax is going to make me quit smoking. I'll order my cigarettes off the Internet then. The smoking ban should be voted on by the people. Not the government.
From: Larry - Louisville (1/30/08) I disagree with Mr. Lamb's point that the current economic crisis mostly was caused bypeople getting homes they could not afford.
Yes, that was some of the cause, but people were getting into homes because the payment wasless than rent they wer, e paying. With the offers they were getting, they were like deer in the headlights; they could only see theywe, re getting a home cheaper than rent. Everyone at all the layers of these sub-prime loans were getting their high fees, so at each level the wolfgot more layers of sheep clothing. I totally agree that this package is a waste of money, but remember -- if it did not include the businesstax cuts that Bush wants, the package would not be happening. It's just another way for the rich to get richer.
From: Troy - Louisville (1/30/08)
In regards to the mortgage crisis and tax rebates: I feel the American consumer is 2/3 responsible for the "mortgage crisis." It is a fine example of thinking only about today, and not tomorrow. Add a dash of "keeping up with the Joneses," and you have a formula for financial disaster. Mortgage lenders are 1/3 responsible for the crisis. A lender should counsel and educate the borrower so that the right decisions are made. Unfortunately, many lenders are only thinking about today, and not tomorrow. Some lenders simply will do anything to get a new loan on the monthly books and not worry about what may come in the future. Tax rebates? I agree with Bill Lamb. Now it is our government making the same mistake -- not looking ahead. A rebate would be a quick fix that will cost us so much more later. The following will sound selfish. I made good mortgage choices. I bought the smaller home so I would have a financial cushion. I chose to have a small family because I cannot financially support a large family. I feel I have made smart choices. Why should my tax dollars be used to bail out those who made poor financial choices (such as folks who bought a large boat, but are now suffering from increasing variable rates... and paying storage fees for the boat?) That situation would kill me. That's why I don't have a boat. Again, maybe I'm too selfish. &nbs, p;
From: Raymond - Louisville (1/30/08)
Congress to a large degree is responsible for our economic problems. They insisted on the American Dream of home ownership to the extent of expecting financial institutions to lend to marginal borrowers. Many minority persons did not have the income, and adjustable rate mortgages were the death knell.
This was much like the pity trip for farmer, s in the ‘80s who speculated on land continuing to rise in value and purchasing outlandish machinery. Also, Congress demolished the CIA and then cried over our level of intelligence gathering.
Continue to speak common sense, whether you're listened to or not.
From: Dan - Fairdale, Kentucky (1/29/08)
I saw the "Point of View" segment just minutes ago and I wanted to respond.
I agree with pretty much everything that was said. The government is handing out money it doesn't have, and it doesn't make any sense.
If I took a cash advance on my credit card to give my, kid $50 for fun, it might make him happy for a week, but when the money is gone, it's gone, and I'm now $50 in debt. Most people would think that I was stupid for doing such a thing. That's the kind of government , we have now. It's frustrating to think that our elected officials can't think of anything to do other than throw money that we don't have at the issue and hope everything works out.
We need something better than a greenback band-aid. What is that solution? I don't know. But $600 or $300 isn't going to help anyone in the long run. And at the end of the day people will spend their "free" money, thank George W. for it as he leaves office, and a part of me will die inside.
I really find it refreshing that there's someone who is willing to go on TV and remind people that "all that glitters isn't gold." Keep up the good work.
From: Robert - New Washington, Indiana (1/28/08)
I would like to give my point of view on the idea of imposing tolls on the bridges. I live in Clark County, Indiana and work in Jefferson County. I pay a non-residential payroll tax each week to JeffersonCounty. It is my understanding that this tax - which, by the way, is more than I pay in ClarkCounty -- is for, upkeep of the road ways. I cross the bridge each day and travel only about two miles of the roadways in order to get to work. I believe that it would be unfair to expect me to pay even more to get to work than I already do. The tax I paid to Jefferson County was about $850. I only paid about $800 in Clark County tax. The ride to work is about 32 miles total, only two of which are in Jefferson County. I think the $850 collected from me in Jefferson County taxes is more than fair. The money collected from me, if you do the math, is about $3.40 a day. That is working , 50 weeks a year, five days a week, with two weeks off for vacation. The total may be a little&nbs, p;less if you con, sider that I may, in the course of the year, cross over to Louisville a few other times. Am I wrong in my understanding of what the non-residential tax is used for? ,
From: Matthew - Louisville (1/29/08)
I don't know if my opinion matters much, but I am sending it to as many persons of our community as possible. My take on the current debacle in our public schools is this: When I read the headline: JEFFERSON WANTS INCOME, RACE, EDUCATION AS CRITERIA, I got choked up and thought to myself, "Aren't we living in the United States?" I moved from a neighborhood that had "problem children" running the streets. I had renters who lived across the street who regularly smoked marijuana and carried on well into the night. I did not serve my country for these past 10 years so I could live like that. So what did I do? At the worst possible time I decided to risk buying a new home and sell my current home, so that my children could play in the yard with no fear of drunken drivers or people speeding well in excess of the posted limit. It was a risk my wife and I personally took on, and eight months later are still dealing with, but it was in the best interest of my children, for whom there is never a price to high to pay. I thought when I moved into this new home, that because I live about ten doors down the street from the public school that there would be no issue with getting my children into that school. My Illinois upbringing allowed me to make a horrible assumption -- that the public school system would do something that makes sense. In the long run, my daughter did get into that school, but next year it is merely the luck of the draw that will determine whether my son will, as well. I believe that race is a card used incorrectly. Diversity is a great thing , and should be encouraged. It should not, however, be a qualifying determinant of where a child goes to school. Also, income and education level of parents should not play a part either. I firmly believe that geography should be the only determinant of where a child goes to school, unless there is a special needs child who can get better attention/care at another facility within the city. My son has Sensory Integration Disorder, and if need be, I would ship him across town for a better education. With the currently proposed plans, that very same school, (just a few doors down my street) will have to displace students. I have no way of knowing what will become of my daughter's attendance there, nor where my son sh, all be sent e, ither. I think there is a lot to say about sending students to schools based on geography rather than any other determinants. Why bus children across the city when so many live so close to the schools in their own neighborhoods? FYI: I make less than 40k a year, am a member of the military, and have a college degree. I do not think that any of those demographics should impact where my child goes to school.
From: Tim - Louisville (1/23/08)
I am surprised that you don't yet see Governor Beshear for the one-sided, self-serving individual that he is. His whole crying wolf game about the Kentucky budget shortfall is nothing more than a, scare tactic to bring fear into Kentuckians so they will vote in his casino plan.
From: Granny - Elizabethtown, Kentucky (1/18/08)
The audacity of these convicted criminals and any attorney who would speak for them! Injection might be painful? Give me a break. Where was an advocate for the victims of these criminals? I wonder if these men might have inflicted pain and terror in the commission of heinous crimes? I do no, t believe in capital punishment. I would assign these criminals to a laboratory or other research facility where they would replace innocent helpless animals. Let the guilty contribute to medical science. See how they feel about that!
From: Chuck - Hardinsburg, Indiana (1/16/08)
As a smoker for over 55 years I strongly resent your Social Engineering of my choice to smoke. I take no issue with the health issues of smoking, but I do have issues about how the anti-smokers are going about phasing out a legal substance. I last went to a doctor in 1994, I'm 62 years old, and I haven't read an, ywhere in the Constitution where "do-gooders" have a right to tell me how to live, or where I am allowed. Banning businesses from making their own choices about how they want to serve the public is Big Brother gone amuck, and self serving for limited minded persons. I would respect the anti-smokers' view were it worthy of respect, but the militant approach deserves no respect. For all of the good that the medical profession does, they don't tell the whole story, such as how many people die from hospital mistakes, doctors' mistakes, and bad pills being pushed by the pharmaceutical companies, the same way they try to blame smokers for all the health issues. Smoking may be a bad habit, but I've never robbed, killed, or maimed anyone for a cigarette. Meth can be controlled by the, medical industry, but it would hurt the lawyers, the court system and the greedy drug pushers if the main ingredient were better controlled, let alone the prison population. Think about, it! Kids are controlled and regulated by a system designed for zero tolerance, which only breeds rebellion, and I&, #39;d rather have a kid that smoked than one who kills or robs for a fix.
From: Brandi - Louisville (1/16/08) &, nbsp;
I recently saw your "Point of View" about the smoking ban and I'm very upset at your views about it. I am a smoker, as you probably guessed, and I don't mind the smoking ban to an extent. My problem is, I don't know why having a smoking break room was a problem, especially in places where there was ventilation. It seems like these days everyone is all about equal rights and against discrimination, but I feel like us smokers are being discriminated against. I'm going to use the same argument that's been around for years: It is no one's business how another person chooses to live their life. I thought this was land of the free. Pretty soon this country is going to be like all those futuristic novels you read in high school -- with a government that total dictated what its people can and can't do. And as far as raising the cigarette taxes go, you know a lot of Kentucky's money is made from the tobacco farmers, and they are already suffering losses. Why would you want to put those people out of business? I think all your views are based on your own personal situation and that you know nothing about life for the working poor. Nothing. Most people smoke as a stress reliever, and while there are other things you can do instead, a pack of cigarettes is cheaper than anything else. If you can find a stress reliever cheaper than a pack of smokes, besides any kind of snack food, then send it my way. A good friend of mine made a good point the other day when we were talking about this ban. Being overweight is unhealthy too, but I don't see anyone trying to put a ban on fatty junk food. People die every day from obesity. Where is the government there? They made all restaurants put those nutrition facts on their food, but a lot of people don't care. They like what t, hey like, and they'll continue to eat what they like. People are going to do what they want to do.
From: Harold - Louisville (1/16/08)
What is next? $ 0.75 cigarette tax, $ 0.40 a gal gas tax, weight watcher tax on losing weight, walking on the side walk downtown tax? Oh, I forgot alcohol tax! Please just take my paycheck, and if there is anything left, pay a tax.
From: J, ohnny - Austin, , Indiana (1/15/08)
I saw you were talking on your Point of View today about the smoking law. And you said you feel Kentucky should raise tax on cigarettes in your state. You also said it would stop a lot of people smoking in Kentucky. Well, I don't know what dreamland you are living in, but it will not cause people to stop smoking! When gas went to $3.20 a gallon, did people stop buying it? No. I think the city of Louisville is making too big of a deal out ofthis. If you and thelawmakers of Louisville are so against smoking, then why d, on't you ban the sale of tobacco in JeffersonCounty? I'll tell you why. It's because of pure greed! You want it both ways. You want the money tobacco brings in, but then turn around and make a stupid law banning smoking in the city of Louisville. Why don't the idiots that make the laws in Louisville make a law about all the drinking that goes on every day? Or raise the price of beer in Louisville? I can tell you that more people are killed by drunk drivers in three months than so-called second-hand smoke in five years. But to hear the idiots in Louisville tell it, every one is going to die from second-hand smoke. What a crock. Let's face it -- it's all about money, and you and I both know it. It's just a bunch of nonsense thought up by some stupid doctor to cause problems for people and businesses in Louisville.
From: Alan and Kim (1/15/08)
I am against any kind of smo, king ban because it should be up to the business owner. It is his or her business.
Anyway, I know smoking is bad for you and second-hand smoke is also bad for you. But in the real world, you, can go out and buy a drink and then drive and kill someone. So are you saying beer should be illegal? Or just whiskey? I think if the business sells alcohol, you should be able to smoke there if the owner wishes to let you. And everyone who doesn't smoke doesn't have to go there., Feel free to go someplace else.
From: Chris - LaGrange, Kentucky (1/14/08)
Give me a break - do the people of this state really think that on his first day in office the state was in such bad shape that services will have to be cut and Governor Beshear, a Democrat, is for no tax increases? Give me a break. Here is what's coming: Cigarette tax Liquor tax Cut in services Casino gambling Isn't it funny how the Gov, ernor said nothing about it in his speech tonight? Yet you know he wants to bring it to Kentucky. Yes, he will save the state by taxing and by bringing in casino gambling. Anyone remember Anne Northup? S, he had the bridge project ready to go - funding well in hand -- and Yarmuth was neither for , it nor against it. Then, when he became congressman, he immediately started talking about how the bridge project was never going to happen because Northup had it all wrong. It is going to cost $4 billion -- not $2.2 billion. Funny math. It went from $2.2 billion on the last day she was in office to $4 billion on his first day. Sudde, nl, y it went from happening to not going to happen. Yarmuth saved his neighborhood. Give me a break. Do they think we cannot see what they have planned? Taxes are coming. Casino gambling is coming. And two bridges will never come without higher taxes! (Of course, I'm for the 8664 project, anyway).
From: Eric - Louisville (1/11/08)
I am so glad that I had to leave the Metro Council meeting early last night to attend the UL-WVU basketball game, where I got , to see one of the few th, ings left that I can be proud of in this city. The Council chose to let t, he di, ctator that sits in what was once known as our mayor's office to tell them how to vote and what is best for their constituents. It is a sad day when only three people out of 26 have the intestinal fortitude to stand up for what is right. To not allow adults taking part in an adult and legal activity in an atmosphere that they have chosen to enter without affecting anyone in this same building that does not wish to be in contact with their smoke is an abortion of justice. It is a fact that my father, who is a lifetime member of the Churchill Downs VFW post, sat in the audience at this Council meeting and was brought to tears by Mr. Mike Clontz, a fellow war vet, stating his position as someone who has fought on foreign soil for our rights and freedom that were taken away last night. We stood up at the start of this Council meeting to recite the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag. The last few words of this pledge are as follows: "For liberty and justice for all." The hypocrisy of the Council stating these words in front of the people of this city is amazing, when, by the end of this same meeting, our liberty and justice were stepped on and smudge, d out. To see the Council members being told by Councilman Engel the true effect the former smoking ban was having on the charities that put upwards of 20 million dollars of money into the Metro area to do charitable works and charitable deeds -- and then ignore every w, ord -- saddens me. They have put a nail in the coffin of every single charitable gaming organization in the metro area. To have the opportunity to give immediate relief to these charities without affecting the health of any non-smoker not wishing to come in contact with second-hand smoke is yet another tragic event. My only hope is that, as Councilman Heiner mentioned last night, someone will step up and move to place an amendment on the floor, in the near future that will add the separate ventilation option. It was, also stated that the Council would have liked to have had the time to get good and factual information on how separate ventilation can work in an actual atmosphere. I personally, as well as Ron Morris, Executive Director of the Kentucky Charitable Gaming Association, invited each and every member of the Metro Council to my facility on January 2nd to see with their own eyes a separately ventilated, negative-pressure facility, set up by engineers, and only one out of 26 took the time to show up and see what we had to offer. (And sadly, only a few of the 26 even bothered to respond to the email invitation with a yes or no.) We are willing to work with President King to set this up again at the Council's convenience. We spent $130,000 in good faith on our separately ventilated room to become compliant with the first metro smoking ban, and would like our Metro Council to see that it can in fact work in a real atmosphere. There are cases where a judge will allow the jury to r, eturn to the scene of a crime. Why not allow the council to return to the scene of a perfect example of how separate ventilation can&n, bsp;and was working? Also, to hear Councilwoman Welch attempt to argue that opening doors to a separately ventilated room causes it not to work is comical. Has everyone forgotten she is a nurse and not an engineer? The whole purpose of negative pressure is that the clean air moves in, in the case of smoking rooms, keeping the smoke inside the room no matter how many times that door is opened. Councilman Heiner also told the council that he spoke to an engineer who said that it does, in fact, work. The moral and ethical implications of the Council's vote last night may not cause them to lose sleep. However, I would like to see them try and fit in their budget some aid to these charities that are going to lose their gaming license, due to the smoking ban that they voted for.
From: Steve - Louisville (1/11/08)
Regarding the recent passing of the smoking ban: Jerry Abramson tried his best to get a library tax. I have another suggestion of how to get the money needed. Instead of a smoking b, an, how about charging businesses a smoking lic, ense of so much per year, which could be similar to a liquor license? It would have to be renewed every year. It could be a very large amount, so that only a few businesses could have it. And to have the smoking license, they would require the business to have either proper ventilation or a separate smoking area. With the smoking ban, where does it stop, ? I do not smoke, nor do I drink. So let's have a drinking ban as well. I , do not like going out to concerts, sporting events, etc., where others are drinking and not handling their liquor very well. I take my children, to these e, vents where grown men and women are cursing, yelling, and even fighting because they have been drinking. Then, they are very likely to be climbing behind the wheel of a vehicle driving down the same road I'm on with my children. How many smokers do you know that have climbed behind the wheel and killed someone just due to their smoking? How many accidents per year involve drunk driving? Churchill Downs brings an enormous amount of money to our city. So why not allow them this opportunity? The money is greatly needed for schools and libraries.
From: Jonathan - Louisville (1/10/08)
Bill Lamb's Dart to the Fl, orida State Seminoles was way off the mark. First of all, the Seminoles are a group of young men playing a TEAM sport. Players, who break the rules should be punished, but not players who conducted themselves properly. As long as they had enough players who weren't a part of the scandal to fill the positions, they deserved to be rewarded for what they accomplished. The only thing that tarnished Kentucky's vic, tory is the fact that they couldn't beat a depleted FloridaState by more than seven points. One good game against LSU does not equal matching up against anyone. Their five losses prove that. If they had come up against a better team, or even a team that wasn't depleted, their performance would have gained them a loss. &, amp;n, bsp;
From: Joe - Louisville (1/10/08)
I disagree with you on this one. Considering over 20 straight bowl appearances and two national titles, I believe the smaller FSU roster was plenty worth, y. I also feel stepping aside would have been unfair to the rest of the players who played hard all season. I watched most of the bowl games, and this was one of the better match-ups.
From: Kathy - Louisville (1/10/08)
Why would an extra tax on cigarettes work now and not in the past? Do people have the right to smoke, or just pay more for it? Adults should have the right to choose. The smoking ban is hurting some businesses, while others will not admit it.
From: Laura - Louisville (1/10/08)
I am not a smoker. Smoke bothers , my eyes and I can't stand to be in smoky places. But I don't think the government or anyone else has the right to ban smoking as a whole. I think it's up to each individual business if they want a smoke-free establishment. If you don't like the smoke, don't go in there.
From: Lynn - Louisville (1/10/08)
When I last checked, smoking was not against the law. I have enjoyed many a smokeless lunches and dinners since the ban, but I see any ban as an infringement on our rights. How can the local government legislate what happens in a privately owne, d business as unlawful when it is acceptable in publ, ic and in our own homes? When will the local government tell us as citizens that we cannot perform fully lawful acts on our own property? Don't get me wrong. I understand the ills of smoking and that second hand smoke is as bad as first hand. But businesses should be able to operate within the law and be subject to their customers' likes or dislikes. Who knows? Maybe they will legislate what news gets reported next.
From: Andrea - Campbellsburg, Indiana (1/9/08)
As far as I am concerned, the smoking ban is unconstitutional. The citizens of JeffersonCounty already voted on the issue, and they voted in favor of smoking. The Metro Council didn't like the vote, and voted in the no-smoking ordinance. This was against the citizens' and business owners' wishes. This was wrong, and another example of backdoor politics. The citizens have no rights. Only the Metro Council has rights.
From: Susan - Louisville (1/9/08)
I personally feel we do not live in Russia, and feel that smoking in bars is really an issue that needs to be addressed. They are not worried about peoples' livers while they're in bars drinking, nor the DUIs that are caused by drinking, but are worried about smoking in the bars? To me, that makes no sense. And what happened to freedom? If, the government keeps this up, the USA will be worse than Russia.
From: Benita - Louisville (1/8/08)<, /B>
The smoking ban makes me believe that my rights as an American citizen are being trampled. It's reminiscent of Prohibition in the 1920s. I understand the concern about second-hand smoke, but why can't there be a plan for better circulation and evacuation of smoke so everyone can enjoy themselves at local establishments instead of making smokers congregate on the sidewalks and throwing their butts there? Mayor Jerry Abramson has spent all his years in office and millions of dollars to make downtown a fun place to be, and now they are blocking half the businesses from people who enjoy smoking. The LouisvilleInternationalAirport's layout is a joke for travelers who are stressed and delayed. These people have to walk the entire length of the airport to go outside, then stand in the security line, then walk a, ll the way back to their gate. It's very unkind. The Louisville hospitals house people who are extremely upset with loved ones in precarious health situations and they now have nowhere to get a break. It's humiliating to have to go stand on a street corner when you're all dressed up to smoke in the summer time, but we do not enjoy a tropical climate and it will be not be a fun time when it's dark and cold outside. I also fear it will be a dangerous situation as far as crime is concerned. I will stay in the comfort of my own home rather than be subjected to this unfair smoking ban.
From: Theresa - Louisville (1/8/08)
I respect your opinion about reinstating a comprehensive smoking ban, and I agree with last week's opinion when you stated that if, Kentucky does indeed legalize gambling, casinos should be required to pay substantial licensing fees. However, I believe the two opinions create a conflict regarding Metro Louisville's future ability to attract gambling revenue. If I were a casino operator, I would have serious concerns about investing millions of dollars in this community when it is highly likely that smokers w, ill continue to cross the bridge to spend their hard-earned dollars.
From: Judy - Louisville (1/8/08)
It doesn't really matter if I smoke or not. The real issue is the right of people to make their own choices. If health concerns are the issue, then why not make sugar unlawful or liquor sales unlawful? Why not make exercise mandatory, i.e., walking to work instead of driving a car? Why not make it mandatory to attend a specific church or to practice a particular religion? What about all of the pollution that the metro government allows in the air? Why not concentrate on that problem? There are so many issues in this city - crime, murders, school shootings and more. Do y, ou know I am afraid to walk my dog after dark because of all of the rapes? Why not concentrate on those folks? What about all those persons who drive and talk on a cell phone? How many times have I al, most been hit by one of those folks? Why not turn your "liberal" eye on that issue? I think that if a person owns their own restaurant or bar, they should have the right to make their own choices. It appears that Louisville is now a dictatorship. And please, the reason you all give for a smoking ban - "to protect those who work in these places?" Hogwash! I have witnessed those employees ou, tside the businesses, and I have to tell you they smoke more th, an anyone that goes into their establishments. Also, they made the choice to work in that business. There are many restaurants and bars that have made their own choice to be smoke fre, e. And that is ok, because they made their own choice. Why do these people not work in one of those places? I understand the need to keep children away from so-called second-hand smoke. Although I grew up with a smoking parent, it did not harm me in any way. In fact, the smell of smoke is a comfort to me. And it is a very dear sensory memory. I think if a person is a legal adult, they should make their own choices. The government does not have to treat us as if we are children. What I really cannot understand is, if God allows us to make our own choices, who are you to make them for me?
From: Ken - Louisville (1/8/08)
People should be ab, le to choose. If a non-smoking bar were a viable business, there would be one today. To the best of my knowledge, there isn't one. Is this a new age prohibition? I think this is a democracy. That means we all have rights. You speak of irrefutable evidence regarding smoking. Have you read the Business First account of this debacle? You should. It is actually reporting, not some mouthpiece for the mayors' office. By the way, how many people are killed in auto accidents every year? Perhaps we should all take the bus. We've all read about the hazards of letting our kids watch too much TV (sex and violence). Let's outlaw that too. Don't attempt to take away my right to choose. Most of the people I know in the media wish, to safeguard our right of choice, whether it is an election, or a choice of ice cream flavors. You have lost me as a viewer.
From: Dave - Jeffersontown, Kentucky (1/8/08)
Everyone is talking about how we are , "violating" someone's rights by not allowing them to smoke in public buildings. Well, no one says you can't smoke. Just don't do it in public where you impinge on the rights of non-smokers. What about my rights to not have to breathe your second-hand smoke? Do you people have any idea how bad you smell? How the smoke filling the air in a restaurant can trigger an asthma attack on my child? Who is looking out for my rights to take my family out to a restaurant and enjoy an evening without a hospital trip? Who is looking out for the rights of the people who work in those establishments to have a safe environment? The smoking ban needs to stand. People who smoke will not quit. People who don't will enjoy more freedoms and a healthier environment.
From: Bill - Shelbyville, Kentucky (1/8/08)
I frequently agree with you, but I think the JeffersonCounty smoking ban (along with other similar smoking bans) is misdirected. The advertising for the smoking ban touts it as protection for employees and guests, but there are many businesses that have poor air quality, but are not covered by the ordinance. I am a former smoker (I quit in December of 2005), but I think the i, ssue should be air quality, not prohibiting smoking. Many businesses have unhealthy air quality even if they do not allow smoking in the workplace. I guess this is only a political issue, not one meant to help all victims of poor air quality. I know, from your Point of View segments, that you support the smoking ban in JeffersonCounty, but I would like for you to reconsider that support. A much better ordinance would be one that specifies a minimum air quality, not smoking criteria.
From: Ken - Louisville (1/7/08)
I feel that we need to quit spending billions of dollars on campaigns and do away with the Electoral College altogether, . It is antiquated and needs to be done away with. It had its time back in the day when communication was more difficult. There are many ways to get everyone out to vote. We don't need the Electoral College to tell us who won. The popular vote should do that (a, s we learned eight years ago, the popular vote didn't count). It is much easier to sway the Electoral Colleg, e than it is the entire American public. Let's use these billions of dollars spent on caucuses and conventions to reduce the deficit, feed the people and house the homeless. Let's use that money to properly equip the troops fighting for our right to vote.
From: C.H. - Louisville (1/7/08)
I hope they vote against the smoking ban. I want the choice to smoke or not. If a place of busines, s chooses to not let me smoke, I can choose not to go there -- just as it is every voter's choice who they vote for next election. Our soldiers are fighting for freedom of choice that you are trying to take away. What makes the people pushing this ban any better then Hussein himself? They have already run tobacco companies out of Kentucky. Isn't it our right to choose? Or have we become a Communist state? Why not work on lowering gas prices or lowering gas and electric bills?
From: Ray - Louisville (1/4/08)
Bill, I respectfully disagree with legalized gambling in Kentucky. My reason is, so many promises were made if the lottery was legalized, particularly regarding Kentucky's educational system. It just didn't pan out. Now, promises are again being made if Kentucky legalizes gambling. These , pro, mises are empty. Clearly, every Kentuckian knows our state has a cash flow problem. So what's new? Every administration -- Democrat or Republ, ican -- voted into office says the state is in bad shape. Do we really believe the pipe dream of legalized gambling will fix the problem?
From: Greg - Louisville (1/3/08)
As an American business owner, the smoking ban is just wrong. Smoking is still legal. It should be up to the business owner to decide if they want smoking in their establishment or not. If their patrons disagree with smoking, then they should go elsewhere, or if enough customers complain to the business owner (or stop going there), I'm certain they'll change it. Even better, open non-smoking places to pull in those people as customers. Let the people a, nd business owners decide, not the government. It creates choice and competition. That's America -- or at least it was. We seem to continue to get farther and farther from our freedom. Next on the government's agenda: the "People are too overweight" law. There will now be a weigh-in at every restaurant to determine what (if anyth, ing) you're allowed to eat.
From: Mike - Louisville (1/3/08) Not sure where to send this, so I sent it here. Who is responsible for the Christmas tree on top of the 800 building, which has been off for years? I just want to give a BIG Thanks to the person who had it turned on this season. Growing up in the Limerick neighborhood in Old Louisville in the 1960s, I always knew it was the start of the holiday season when I saw the Christmas tree on the 800 all lit up from my bedroom window. At that time, you could see that tree from almost anywhere. And believe me, I looked for it every night. I just wanted to say I felt that little boy's Christmas excitement come over me when I was driving toward downtown one night on I-65. Just the sight of that tree brought back so many memories, which I proceeded to share with my wife. After all, Christmas is about bringing the little kid out of all of us. Thanks again for the tree on the 800, and I look forward to seeing it again next year!
3/13/08) 3/17/08)
